/anime/ - Anime

アニメ

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


(225.10 KB 636x900 pPwTniI.jpg)
Lolipol Anonymous 09/14/2020 (Mon) 08:44:35 No. 2865
Why a lot of leftists hate lolis? Are they retarded or just thinking loli mean Pedophile?
>>2865 You need to go outside and talk to actual women man, I don't know what else to tell you.
>>2865 You probably will have a better company at /pol/
>>2865 Imma be real with you chief: get some pussy. Some real world pussy, doesn'teven really matter if god tier or Vaush gf tier, literallly find the comfort of a woman in your life.
If you're just into stylistically cute characters, whatever. It's a little weird but being weird isn't terrible. If you sexualize said stylistically cute characters, or use images of characters resembling children as pornography, you are a pedo, and you should get your head bricked in. It doesn't matter if they're "not real" or "ackthually a 500 year old vampire". The social effect, both individually (conditioning and rewarding the brain from sexualizing the child form) and social (In normalizing the idea of pedophilia by both creating a population of pedophiles and normalization of pedophillia by defending their access to child pornography) endanger children, and have a detrimental effect on society as a whole both economically (eg from economic damages brought about by psychological and mental/emotional harm from molestation, which are bared by the entire immediate families & likely friends/descendants of the victim) and socially. The only Socialist/Leftist position is death penalty for all pedophiles AND more importantly, death penalty for pedophile enablers.
>>2866 >>2867 >>2868 spooked af replies expected better from this place
>>2869 were you personally raped or something you sound like a fucking rightoid
(360.91 KB 600x456 inarticulateyelling.png)
>virtual child pornography
(262.61 KB 1246x1739 a.jpg)
Cool political thread, dude!
>>2869 Jesus "You like sexualized lolis = Pedophile" You sound like a shittie moralfag making fake correlations between first ans second one. Guy, show me you cientific evidences of being a lolicon means youre a pedophile
because leftypol is filled with edgy tweens who fantasize about executing any group of people they dont like
>>2874 >show me you cientific evidences lmao
NOOO YOU CANT JUST SEXUALIZE THE HECKING PIXELS THAT ARE SHAPED LIKE THE WHOLESOME CHILDRINOS ITS UPSETTING MY SPOOKED LIZARD BRAIN AAAAHHHHHHH
>>2871 Yes but my personal circumstances are irrelevant. Scientifically we can observe that pedophillia generates detrimental social and economic affects, frankly in excess of even murder (unless you happened to murder the guy who was curing cancer). A comrade (economist/mathematician) and I actually went through the trouble of calculating the economic harm of pedophilia once and we determined that the cost born to society by a single instance of molestation or child rape can easily amount to the 9 figure range in $USD, although there is technically "infinite" potential for economic across multiple generations.That is without going into social and thus political harm from allowing this to happen. We know that many pedophiles today are conditioned into Pedophilia by pornography, and usually affecting people who initially had no interest in child pornography. As people adjust to pornography and no longer receiving arousal from their "current level", they shift to more and more extreme material, with the majority of porn addicts eventually finding themselves viewing hardcore pornography of some kind including "lolicon" and other forms of child pornography. Consuming this conditions the brain to sexualize children, and physically changes the way their brain is hard wired. Legalization of pornography broadly and especially lolicon thus produce people who can go on to harm children. Scientifically and morally (from a collectivist/Marxist value system) there is no justification for Pedos and Pedo enablers (eg, those who defend loli and pornography) not to be sent to a gas chamber or shot.
>>2878 "Infinite" potential for economic harm*
>>2878 counterpoint: fuck off
>>2874 >Guy, show me you cientific evidences of being a lolicon means youre a pedophile What is the deifnition of a lolicon?
>>2878 >Scientifically we can observe that pedophillia generates detrimental social and economic affects, frankly in excess of even murder fucking lol this is some epic bait
>>2882 Economic damage from physically removing/killing a person amounts to a lower dollar value in terms of economic harm even if assuming said person is young and factoring in a lifetime of labour, yes. Economic damage is not the only criteria in which we can measure how harmful a thing is, but it is useful.
>>2883 >more pedos means theres a larger chance that some children might not be as good labor machines in the future i mean, it's certainly an argument... i guess
>>2883 >>2878 Oops, slight error. Meant to say "8 figure" not 9 figure. $14-$20 million is a reasonable assessment but again, there is *potential* for ""infinite"" or far larger economic damage when spread across a larger frame of time (eg several generations)
>>2878 So you are against porn in general?
It is disgusting that this thread hasn't been deleted yet Pedos get the wall unless they accept treatment And pedo defenders just get the wall
>>2886 Yes, as the socialist movement has historically been, and still is everywhere outside the west.
>>2887 me right and good, you wrong and die ban bad man >:( ungra
>>2869 What's the proof that a loli anime character is equivalent to a real life little girl for a lolicon fan? What is the proof that the idealized "loli character" is not simply a unique creation of anime similar to a pokemon? A loli character seems so highly stylized (most of the time) that I can't say they ever make me think of even human beings much less real little girls. >We know that many pedophiles today are conditioned into Pedophilia by pornography This doesn't sound like a very scientific statement. Is there a study that relates convicted pedophiles and porn addiction?
>>2889 Yes
>>2888 >social conservatism=socialism damn i didn't realize i was on stupidpol
The only reason this is even an issue is because people have it in their heads that sex is some sort of special “other” which normal logic doesn’t apply to for some reason. The only reason we see children engaging in sexual behavior as a negative is because we see sexuality itself as a negative.
>>2893 this sex is the ultimate and final spook
>>2892 Being pro/anti porn has nothing to do with "conservativism". I think you'll find the vast majority of socialists in the world are in favor of having pornography banned, as we have historically seen in basically all socialist states. Science is on our side, as it has long since been determined pornography is detrimental both to the health of individual consumers and also the well being on society. "Socialists" who have a problem with banning porn are almost always Americans or Westerners, if not upper class, and also usually addicted to consuming pornography. The idea that these are "choices" to be made by individual consumers falls back on liberal/far right wing idea of perfect rationality in consumers, which is a bizarre myth invented to justify liberal capitalist economics and neoliberalism.
>>2894 abolish sex
>>2895 what if we take money out of the equation should distributing exhibitionist video tapes or files still be banned?
>>2888 You realize what happens if you ban porn, right? You know all those sites where child porno is currently hosted, the ones that are the harder to reach than just typing their name in google? That's where your regular porn is going to be hosted if you banned porn. You would literally have vanilla porn alongside CP. Thus CP would become normalized. You want this?
>>2894 And this applies to every instance of sexuality, from fringe to mundane. Sex is the eternal “other” and all this bickering about what is and isn’t moral just comes from, in my opinion, a fundamentally flawed base premise that sex is somehow fundamentally different from every other human activity and behavior
>>2897 Depends on the material. If it is intended to be used as a sexual/masturbation aid, then yes. If it was not intended as such but is primarily used as a sexual/masturbation aid, yes also.
>>2900 fucking lol
>>2898 The Socialist position should be to ban/heavily alter the internet, eg, eliminate individual websites. A single "homepage" linking to various sub-sections, eg academic, education, entertainment, and so and so on. The model adopted by the DPRK today is a perfectly reasonable example for how the internet should exist under socialism.. Actually running an individual "website" should be impossible, and if necessary the infrastructure which enables this to happen should be destroyed.
>>2900 ok now you sound like someone that was raped as a kid
>>2903 Why?
>>2899 >ywn be an inorganic species that isn't spooked to constantly be obsessed with the sanctity of sexual reproduction and protecting muh children
>>2903 >unironic DPRKtard oh no n oN nO nO ONONNO!!
Jap-loving freaks
>>2905 The entire internet as it exists is a reflection of liberal capitalism and liberal capitalist ideology and society. "Social media" and webpage ownership are in the grand scheme of things bizarre phenomena which could have only been born out of a society infected with extreme individualism and hyper-competition. I think if the internet was invented in almost any other human society, it would look entirely different. Even a different capitalist society which just happened to not be so liberal. The way the internet has been structured, and both the discourse and way this discourse occurs as well as it's general use necessarily reinforce and condition towards liberal ideology and individualism. On top of that, our goal as socialists is to create a "social" society, and a society in which social atomization has been crushed, with strong local working communities, will not fit the kind of model of internet which exists today. It'll either be neglected, or said model will malform society and create potential for reaction. "Ban the internet *as it exists*" is a decent Marxist-Leninist position, and again, most Communists in the world would not be opposed to this save for the pety-bourgeois of the 2nd/3rd world and internet addicted westerners.
>>2909 if you hate the liberal internet so much maybe you should do us all a solid and log off
>>2910 "If you hate capitalism why do you have a computer produced under capitalism" Bourgeois/reactionary positions create bourgeois/reactionary responses.
(22.74 KB 466x422 conceit.JPG)
>>2909 >most Communists in the world would not be opposed to this
>>2909 The entire internet as it exists is a reflection of liberal capitalism and liberal capitalist ideology and society. because the people who control the internet right now are liberal capitalists, not because the internet is inherently like this by most means the internet in theory is more of a socialist utopia than the real world ever could be. there's functionally no concept of scarcity of space or goods (data).
>>2911 it's called a joke
>thread tangentially related to politics >almost 50 replies already This place is a joke.
>>2915 personally i just love these threads that have pedo related discussion in them because it's so easy to piss off the spooked reactionaries that are drawn to them like flies
>>2913 The very idea of "running a webpage" is just a digital form of property ownership. The idea of individual owning a piece of territory on the internet could only emerge in a society with a concept of "right" of private property ownership.
>>2917 do you understand that the only reason private property ownership is bad is because of scarcity right? because by owning you're denying something to somebody else this problem does not exist when there are a theoretically unlimited number of webpages
Sorry for not having an English source, i Translate you fron the article Is a person who consumes lolicon, shotacom or yaoi a pedophile? No. To assess whether a person is sexually attracted to children (paedophilia), the consumption of materials such as lolicon, shotacom or yaoi is not a sufficient criterion to either confirm or rule out that we are dealing with a person with paedophilia. Therefore, it is not possible to respond in absolute terms in a positive or negative way. Each case has to be analysed individually. Not all people who consume lolicon, shotcacom or yaoi have sexual inclinations of a paedophile nature nor are all paedophiles interested in or consume this type of sexual images. Various studies have also failed to link the association between paedophilia and lolicon - They are not considered a crime against the freedom and sexuality of minors. -They do not constitute an apology for the sexual exploitation of children. -They are not included in the current Penal Code as examples of child pornography. SOURCE: https://angelblau.com/lolicon-shotacom-y-yaoi-son-ilegales-en-espana/
>>2920 >legal definitions in a moral/ethics thread why
>>2865 >I want to fuck these kids >NO WAIT WAIT COME BACK <The kids aren't real so its not creepy t.Average lolicon
>>2924 How do you fuck them?
(1.10 MB 871x1230 1594602392256.png)
>conditioning and rewarding the brain from sexualizing the child form If the behaviour is conditioned, then it's possible to condition someone out of it. This doesn't call for a death penalty, just rehabilitation. >A comrade (economist/mathematician) and I actually went through the trouble of calculating the economic harm of pedophilia Source: your ass This is such a fucking word salad.
(1.05 MB 1000x1000 1575692017111.png)
(472.58 KB 800x1040 1575691216975.png)
spoiler please
>>2923 Anon, legal definitions are, in most cases based on moral, out of that, you can read the other part of the message, that gives you the opinion of the bast majority of Sexuality and psychology experts, the fact of, Lolicon doesnt have any relation with pedophilia (this is based on a study based on 21 other studies). The same study says that sexual toys doesnt help or stop violations
(83.83 KB 736x779 1599422545164.jpg)
1) I don't hate loli, loli are cute girls. I hate sexualization of loli, because regardless of what your shitty arguments are, they're CHILDREN and often enough, anime-face or not, they are depicted with fairly accurate child-like bodies and moreover, child-like behaviours. 2) This 'discussion' is cringe and belongs on /pol/ and has already been done. Last time this argument began the Vols had to step in and ban people and say stop, so don't start this shit argument again.
(90.54 KB 1024x576 VLCitis.jpg)
I guess lolicons are a very unintrusive type of pedophile. I'm OK with them, they have their perversion well under control. The art, sex dolls, etc. are very effective containment of such tastes. We should encourage as many pedos as possible to settle for being lolicons instead of molesters, and provide them with plenty of material. Then execute the ones who can't or won't :3
>>2934 1) Lets accept they are children, and then, what? correlation between Pedo and loli doesnt exist, stop doing mental gymnastics. 2)Anon...
>>2942 >Then what <The correlation doesn't exist And here we go again. Unironically jump off a bridge.
>>2874 >>2871 >>2890 >All this shit <N-noooooo don't call us out!!!! >>2898 >If you bann porn it will normalize CP because porn will be hidden That's such backwards logic. I'm fairly sure that 90% of the world population does not know how to get on the darknet and its porn sites. so fuck off. Also normal porn is already on the darknet as well idiot.
>>2943 Are you retarded anon? there are no cientific evidente supporting your dumbass point, go to kill yourself.
>>2906 <protecting children is just moralism, it's totally not demonstrated that children are very impressionable and what they see or do affects their adult lives. Should I bring up the fact that many of the worlds worst paedophiles, rapists and serial killers were mentally scarred by things like seeing sexual acts and abuse and were sometimes the subject of this right? We see this all the time, such as in modern culture, where the constant exposure of young girls and 'dancing' has led to pre-teen girls twerking while having money thrown to them on the street and young boys being "drag queens" and performing in gay bars. This is literally what capitalist Weimar Germany was like before the Nazis took power.
>>2908 >The one time you agree with Pol-Pot fags
(1.10 MB 1438x2000 1527235205721.jpg)
mean lolicons committing the most ebil thoughtcrime of all Zizek is right when he says that child sexuality is the biggest taboo of liberal society
Guys, its easy. im gonna tell ya again, SHOW CIENTIFIC PROOFS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN PEDOPHILIA OR GTFO. You cant, there no serious cientific researches reaching this stupid conclusion.
(132.50 KB 1000x750 lolicon meme.jpg)
(125.64 KB 1024x1020 pedoomer weeb.jpg)
>>2946 It attempts to normalize the idea of child sexualization. Real or drawn is not the point and never was. Neither are we debating whether lolicon should be legal or illegal. Of course lolicon is just fictional art, But art by defenition is a representation of something. What does lolicon represent as an art? It represents the sexualization of prepubescent children and minors. >dere's no evidence 1) The ONLY people who keep arguing for loli porn are the Japs who make it (and we all know how fucked they are) and Westerners addicted to porn consumption 2) Lolicon originates from a book called Lolita about an abusive paedophile's attraction to an underage girl. The very aesthetic of loli is that of an underage girl. If you're fapping to loli you are attracted to the body and the implication of it being underage. The meaning of ロリコン so does 小児愛 is almost same as pedophile if you look into japanese wikis ,dictionaries or blogs, and 小児愛 is the psychological term for ロリコン. https://old.reddit.com/r/AskSocialScience/comments/bcxndd/if_pedophilia_is_a_mental_illness_why_isnt_there/ >There's no science Because there are very few people interested in researching such a disgusting topic. Moreover very few paedophiles will admit to BEING paedophiles and not all paedophiles are the same. inb4 'muh erection' Chikotilo was notable for having erectile dysfunction when aroused so it is just as likely in any other such candidate. Moreover a limit in sample size is also a problem. "A press release issued by the University of Chicago Press Journals states that a new study to appear in the Journal of Consumer Research shows that social change is driven when information reaches easily influenced people who then influence other easily influenced people." Spataro J. writes: "Similar to the general population, CSA victims who died as a result of self-harm were predominantly aged in their 30s at time of death. Most had contact with the public mental health system and half were recorded as being diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. Our data highlight that CSA victims are at increased risk of suicide and accidental fatal drug overdose. CSA is a risk factor that mediates suicide and fatal overdose." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20170453/ https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-01-people-susceptible-social-age.html "Lolicon is a genre/theme of Anime in which underage female anime characters are sexually depicted." Now why would anyone want to see underage female characters depicted sexually? Because they're attracted to that, which is essentially paedophilia, fictional or not. Also to return to "lolicon in Japan" Japan has seriously cracked down on lolicon recently because they have 3rd graders with STDs and parents renting out their daughters for sex. From 1999 to 2012, Child abuse in Japan has increased by 5. 7 times. That's a pretty significant jump in such a short amount of time if you ask me. The rates of sexual abuse among high-schoolers and elementary kids are increasing in around the same rates, But for other forms of abuse (while both ages are still increasing) elementary kids are rising at a faster and more extreme rate. Http://www.Japantoday.Com/category/crime/view/saga-woman-arrested-for-forcing-daughters-into-prostitution http://www.Wsj.Com/articles/SB844189550290273000 http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2013-07-11/1st-person-arrested-for-cg-child-pornography-in-japan http://www.japanator.com/fffuuu-tokyo-s-anti-loli-bill-passes-in-commitee-17722.phtml&mainnav=&track http://www.ipsnews.net/2003/03/japan-officials-clamping-down-on-underage-sex-offered-on-line/ http://www.japansubculture.com/underage-japanese-girls-learning-to-sell-themselves-online/
(295.70 KB 1864x1640 Dumb.jpg)
(14.24 KB 632x318 Dumb2.png)
>>2951 Nice try, but its my turn. >Because there are very few people interested in researching such a disgusting topic. Moreover very few paedophiles will admit to BEING paedophiles and not all paedophiles are the same. inb4 'muh erection' This is fragrantly no true. >The meaning of ロリコン so does 小児愛 is almost same as pedophile if you look into japanese wikis ,dictionaries or blogs, and 小児愛 is the psychological term for ロリコン. Its used as a synonim, but this doesnt proof anything actually, nippongos even know what is a lolicon and what is a pedophile. Most of the sources you give are not related to lolicon, im not a defensor of CP or childres sexualization of real girls. Some sources: https://unnecessaryexclamationmark.com/2019/09/30/japan-vs-the-un-the-fight-for-artistic-freedom/ https://academia.edu/3665383/Lolicon_The_Reality_of_Virtual_Child_Pornography_in_Japan https://newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/pharrell-williamss-lolicon-girl/amp https://prostasia.org/blog/why-the-un-is-wrong-to-equate-drawings-to-sexual-abuse/ https://knowyourmeme.com/forums/serious-debate/topics/60653-so-what-doesnt-make-lolicon-pedophilia https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MZk8bm6fbAF1Dcu2G24M1P7pmDoGbz-f6pJaPM5QfxU/edit https://unnecessaryexclamationmark.com/2019/09/30/japan-vs-the-un-the-fight-for-artistic-freedom/ http://hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html https://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedom-of-icky-speech.html http://cbldf.org/2012/07/danish-report-discredits-link-between-cartoons-and-child-sex-abuse/ "it was Japan’s Women’s Institute Of Contemporary Media Culture that gave the retort. Speaking on behalf of the Institute, Kumiko Yamada’s statement raised two key points: that violence in fiction does not threaten the rights of real women, and that manga is a field of expression that Japanese women have cultivated for themselves. Both of these remarks are relevance to the current controversy over lolicon. No causal link between lolicon fiction and the sexual abuse of real children has been established by researchers and experts in the field. Indeed, studies have shown that countries that have legalized ‘virtual child pornography’ have seen a decrease in sex crimes against children. In Milton Diamond and Ayako Uchiyama’s 1999 study on ‘Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan’, they observed that the while the lolicon ‘boom’ occurred in a time when sex crime reporting went up overall, reports of child sexual assault went down, which also parallels a lack of positive correlation observed in Denmark." "Danish Report Discredits Link Between Cartoons and Child Sex Abuse by cbldf • July 25, 2012 • Comments Offon Danish Report Discredits Link Between Cartoons and Child Sex Abuse The Copenhagen Post reveals that a report issued by experts at Sexologisk Klinik discredits claims that cartoon depictions of underaged characters engaging in sex acts encourage people to commit child sex crimes in real life. The report to the justice ministry states: “We have had to acknowledge that there is no evidence that the use of fictive images of sexual assaults on children alone can lead people to conduct sexual assaults on children.”
(329.46 KB 720x768 lolicon clown.png)
>>2952 >Muh Kumiko!!!! >Muh studies saying its not the same because X details >Muh crime correlation = causation <Dead Dove Do Not Eat Fuck me you're just spitting out the same tired pedo-defenses I don't know what I expected. >pics Damn I thought my memes were mediocre but those are just sad. Just make it easier for everyone - yourself included - and just end this misery >Its used as a synonim, but this doesnt proof anything actually The sheer spelling failure of this convinces me that either you're a child or a genuine retard. >Most of the sources you give are not related to lolicon Nice try in ignoring the point fag. >fragrantly no true The fuck does that even mean? And no, paedos do not tend to be open about who they are. A lolicon is sexually attracted to drawn depictions of young children, PERIOD. Spamming the same tired pedo-defense links is not an argument.
>>2952 >A Danish Report discredits LOL do you believe every headline you read? I feel like you're just believing any fucking source that backs your shitty argument and ignoring the ones that don't The only good thing about this thread of shit is that it raises PPH.
(74.33 KB 640x1136 lolicon paedo.jpg)
>>2952 >pic 1 <head only <hurr if you see child you mentally ill No.
>>2954 >ignoring the ones that don't that's exactly what you're doing, except that you don't even have any studies backing your point, that drawn loli increase child sex abuse
(29.51 KB 480x360 m & l.jpg)
>>2952 >Nice try, but its my turn. Lmao, is this some turn based game now
post loli and shut the fuck up everybody
loli is turbo degenerate crap obviously provided to us by the turbo fascist shithole of Japan. Despite fascist's cries about "muh degeneracy" they're the ones who get most involved with it, the movie "Saló" explains this phenomenon.
(320.88 KB 704x1000 loli help.jpg)
>>2956 >N-no u Your studies are a bunch of pseud shit that you didn't even read. >>2959 Uhhh no, read the OP, LOLIPOLitics In fact just go to >>>/GET/ as long as you don't say anything mean about trannies and gays they'll welcome your loliposting, just go there and stop posting under-age lewds here. If you want PETIT, there is a flat thread. Also see pic related and get some help. >>2915 This place is primarily inhabited because of /leftypol/ moving here. Therefore the majority of users are interested in political conversation... but I agree, politsrach is fucking cancer. >>2925 Body pillows, onaholes, jerking off to the images, VR-suits, ERP etc. It's not that fucking complicated
(22.83 KB 679x243 Nijikon.png)
(159.51 KB 896x1024 Abuse.jpg)
>>2953 I see, youre a deshonest opponet. It is not worth spending time with you when you ignore the evidence and only use ad hominems
>>2947 >where the constant exposure of young girls and 'dancing' has led to pre-teen girls twerking while having money thrown to them on the street and young boys being "drag queens" and performing in gay bars. how are these things inherently traumatic
(189.48 KB 1024x576 faketoreal.jpg)
>>2962 >Pic 2 <hurr let post this fucking out of context data set because the depiction of child porn is the only variable difference <lets ignore the inherent societal differences in Japan and the UK, wherein Japan is hyper-repressed in real life to the point where large portions of men have their first sexual experiences with their own mothers and are marrying virtual characters. <It's not like people barely interact with one another there outside of a professional level This is the same disingenuous tactic used by porky-cucks who compare US and Soviet economic and cultural output with no actual context. >deshonest It's spelled 'dishonest' and 'opponent'. And your Nijikon is not a fucking argument, if anything it only proves that this shit is a mental illness. GET HELP >ignore the evidence LO fucking L look at you kettle >ad hominems Calling you a pedo is not ad hominem, it's the truth. Some more links on japanese sexual abuse and child-related sex products going up related to what I posted >>2951 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/1226/ https://happymag.tv/a-disturbing-number-of-child-sex-dolls-have-been-intercepted-by-australian-border-force/ https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00704/ The biggest majority of people defending drawn CP are lolberts and rightoids, primarily Western. That should say a lot on its own. >>2963 If you don't understand why this is wrong, you're part of the problem. Drag and Twerking are inherently sexual behaviors that a pre-pubescent child or pre-teen won't even BEGIN to understand as such, but will imitate. They do it because exposure tells them "this is good/gets attention" which is the subconscious want of most children and even people. This is essentially social grooming and therefore child abuse. It's the same shit as beauty pageants, except worse, because at least in those disgusting pageants the children remain clothed and unexposed. No kid actually wants to go on stage in a dress and be stared at by strangers or for a drag queen to read / interact with them. This is shitty tolerast parents who want to feel good and progressive about themselves pushing for sexual deviants to be in their schools, or projecting their own obsessions. Recently there was a series of videos made where a handful of kids were face to face with a drag queen or a homo or a tranny and their reactions ranged from repeating a mantra they'd heard from their parents without understanding (free love) to confusion/curiosity at something weird, to outright disgust. Nowhere did any of the kids want to do this outside of a concept of what comes down to playing dressup and acting roles, which isn't what drag or trans is. Kids don't have real sexualities and are developing and therefore open books to being influenced, by ironic or unironic sexualization, fictional or not. I actually posted about this before. This also applies to young adults who tend to go with the flow of society, so as demonstrated, if sexualizing children and minors becomes socially acceptable people start imitating it. JP cafes and other sexual abuse is often a direct reference to maid-cafe shit and schoolgirl fetishes depicted in anime and manga and doujins to the point where grown men hire 16 year old girls who look young to dress and re-enact erotic scenes, even without direct sex. It's disgusting when grown smelly adults have folders full of japanese cartoons of little girls and fantasize about them... how is that not mentally ill? How would this not be jarring for any child to be informed of. I have zero tolerance for anything of this kind anymore, it's what let this whole austic Japanese perversion get loose in the first place. There is no artistic value from 90% of these loli lewds. It's just generic, disgusting fap material of a child-representation.
>>2964 why is children being sexual bad
>>2961 >Also see pic related and get some help. You do know that image is parody? Comic Lo is a loli porn mag.
>Cool! A new thread on /anime/ with a ton of posts! <Lolipol >Oh... Honestly kind of disappointed by this thread. Usually lolicon debate threads have a lot of good sources and interesting arguments, but the anti-loli crowd really dropped the ball this time. Anti-lolicon /a/nons were making better arguments 10 years ago. Lots of fallacies and generally shitty sources. I feel like you're kind of rolling over and letting the pedos win. The pro-loli arguments in this thread aren't even that rigorous. I expected bunkerchan to be a bit better at this than 4chan.
>>2975 Yes, I know, and if you actually read the poster... they're basically saying "really do get help if you need it" They're making money off your mental illness, but they're not going to take responsibility for anything that happens. >>2976 Because we already had this debate ad nauseum last year on the Flat thread and frankly its just tiresome. The pro-loli arguments are just fucking the same copy-pasted shit you see on 4chan and people can't be bothered to address them any further when we've done it a dozen times already, including me. People like being filthy pedos so fuck it, let them. When the time comes mental institutions will be ready to accept them into their walls.
>>2927 >>2928 >>2929 Loli porn is actually allowed here?
>>2988 Technically yes, but it is discouraged, especially since federal laws over-ride state laws.
>>2989 Isn't it okay federally, but something the CARE act gives states the ability to apply obscenity charges?
(203.14 KB 895x1197 violates US law loli.png)
(370.28 KB 1300x990 lolicon laws in north America.jpg)
>>2990 I don't remember, but there are enough laws that make posting it a bad idea.
(274.74 KB 927x1200 th4tjnd6mdf51.jpg)
>>2964 It's just a drawing, guy. I like drawing the human body, mostly muscular men, but just for you, I'm gonna try my hand at something else. Also, why is anyone arguing with a loser that wants to ban the internet? Let him live out his fantasy by ignoring him. Bonus: posts things he won't like.
(1.23 MB 946x1434 traps and loli.png)
>>2992 >spoilered pic is literally SFW and has nothing to do with SEXUALIZING lolis <hurr this'll triggur him Thanks for showing zero reading comprehension brainlet. >Lets spam things he don't like because if you think drawn kiddie shit is bad you hate the internet Actually I enjoy the internet and find that being casual and occasionally politically incorrect is fine and relaxing. what I have absolutely no tolerance for is even the remotest implication of child-sex, real or not. >"It's just a drawing" Lazy fucking argument. With that justification I can go draw portraits of Hitler sitting on the emaciated corpses of Holocaust victims and fucking Eva Braun...disgusting It's still pornography depicting children, just in cartoon form. You can babble all you like about the harm done (and ignore the harm it does to the consumer by way of normalization of child sexualization), but pornography isn't defined by harm done. If a cartoon or drawing depicts children sexually, it is cartoon child porn. It might not be 'real' but it's the same difference as 1st and 3rd degree murder. >ignore him <he says while replying >try my hand at something else Go ahead, like I said already, I'm not really trying because there is no point dying on a hill for degenerates. I won't bother with writing exhaustive walls of text in response to equally massive diatribes defending this cartoon child porn
>>2927 No rape from as209 or whatever his name is
(171.06 KB 397x798 loli vs petite.png)
I don't really give a fuck because lolicons are faggots regardless of whether it is genuinely paedo-shit or not. Just going to pose this question and GTFO because this thread is shit. What exactly is going through a niggas head when they're making/watching a clearly under-age anime girl suck someone off in some really oddly high quality image/animation... If it's not the age number because "le 300 year old vampire-dragon" then one concludes the attraction is the childlike body then... HMMMMMMM!!!! And inb4 "cuteness" or some shit - that's what petite is for, see >>166 as an example of this. Saying "at least it's better than actual CP" is a hilariously shit argument. Do you want a medal for being a decent human being and not actually committing crime? 5 years later and DemolitionD+ still has the best take: https://www.clipzui.com/video/l3t4j5t2k3h5u363z416c4.html
>>2964 Im starting to think that you are just a regular fascist/Nazbol/Natso. You're assuming im a lolicon (I'm not) Your bellowing is already annoying, you are not making a point, you are not givin any evidence, you are not applying any type of materialism on your analysis. This is the last thing im gonna addres you again, you can ignore sauces and evidence and keep saying what you want, im not going to give you more attention. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MZk8bm6fbAF1Dcu2G24M1P7pmDoGbz-f6pJaPM5QfxU/edit
Honestly both Anti-Loli and Pro-Loli arguments are trash, simply due to the lack of research on pedophilia as a psychological phenomenom rather than a criminal one, as in, the act itself rather than the reasons for why someone becomes a pedo, although I'm gonna try to see another thing here, the Prevalence of Pedophilia. Now a question for everyone in this thread, biologically speaking, when does a human should start having sexual attraction to another? I assume most of you will answer that biologically speaking it should happen when one is capable of having children, and when does this starts? Puberty, more specifically for girls 1 month after their first period. So when exactly a boy and a girl starts puberty? It varies from person to person, but it's generally around the 10-12 range with common exceptions as young as 7 and as old as 14, now seeing that people is able to have children around the ages of 10-12, does that mean that sexual attraction to children of this age(note that it's not a PRIMARY or DOMINANT sexual attraction) is actually normal sexual behavior for humans? Maybe, I barely seen any research exploring the topic so I really cannot say, what we can do is look historically for answers tho, seeing the age of consent in different points of time. Now when you look historically, you do not find much due to lack of research, not only that but until the 1800s age of consent was embedded with age of marriage, which does not stricly but is a good indicator of age of consumation(that is age of which niggas lose their virginity), which, from what I researched, is around the 7-14 year old range, 7 being the lowest and 10-12 being recommended, age of marriage that is, if we look at Colonial America also, lots of instances of people marrying children around that range. For the first age of consent laws separated from marriage, which began around the early 1800s, it was usually set at the 10-12 year old range as well, I think some of you are aware of the infamous Delaware age of consent set at 7 years old no? There's also certain scientific researchs that I found, that I could not find the full papers, but bring interesting results: "Hanson and Gluckman, who respectively head the Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) at the University of Southampton, and the Liggins Institute at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, researched the age of puberty stretching back beyond the Stone Age. They found that Paleolithic girls arrived at menarche - the first occurrence of menstruation - between seven and 13 years. This is a similar age to modern girls, which suggests that this is the evolutionarily determined age of puberty in girls." As well as "A peer-reviewed scientific journal study (Behavior Therapy 26, 681-694, 1995), conducted by Kent State University, 1995 (Lori L. Oliver, Gordon C. Nagayama, Richard Hirschman) was conducted on a sample of normal (adult attracted) male volunteers using the "penile plethysmograph". The team carried out hundreds of tests exposing men to female adult and child images. 95% exhibited arousal to the female adult images. A staggering 88.7% exhibited arousal to the female child (less than 12 years old) images. Prior to the study, 80% of the participants claimed to have no attraction to children and all of them had no history of illegal or legal youth attracted behavior." If any of you could find those studies I be grateful. Now does this mean attraction to 10-12 years olds is actually normal sexual behavior? I don't fucking know since there's not a lot of research put into it and I'm not a sexologist, it does indicates tho that people attracted to those age ranges are far more numbered than people imagine tho, which is rather concerning. Sources: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051201022811.htm (Ye I know it's bad but the link from this newspaper to the research from the Uni leads to a dead page) https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/ (it gives the sources so not as bad as one may think) There was also a link to the full Decretum Gratiani that it stated the recommended age of marriage in Medieval Europe to be at 7 but I lost the link to it.
>>3002 >>3004 A friend sent the Decretum Gratiani about it as well for me: http://legalhistorysources.com/Canon Law/MARRIAGELAW.htm It's very long tho, so I give one of the excerpts that I found, but it's also a great read to understand how marriages and shit worked in Medieval Europe: "Gratian: Betrothals cannot be contracted before the seventh year. For they can be contracted only with consent, which requires each party to understand what they agree to. This proves that betrothals cannot be contracted between children, because the debility of age prevents consent." http://legalhistorysources.com/Canon Law/MARRIAGELAW.htm#CASE_TWENTY-NINE__
>>3010 there, this is the right one
>>3001 >If you think pedos are bad you're a fascist Godwin's law >You're assuming im a lolicon (I'm not) <I'm not, I just waste hours of my time creating diatribes and shitty google docs to rant about how loli is totally not cartoon CP > ignore sauces and evidence Your sources are just spammed copy-paste and your evidence is fucking flimsy as fuck >not going to give you more attention LOL ok, I haven't been trying from the beginning but I guess even retards can grow a braincell and stop replying to bait. >not applying any type of materialism 1) Stop using words you don't understand 2 My posts, lazy as they were, were plenty analytical and consistent loli is the depiction of a child or child-like body and when used for explicit sexualization this means that YOU are sexualizing a cartoon child. Therefore the only difference to actual paedophilia is it being fictional. However the people who create this and masturbate to this are real. >google doc <imagine making an unironic essay defending cartoon CP Not only are most of the arguments made there flat as fuck, but they also use the same lolicon fallacies that have been dismissed time and time again. For example "Loli as a tool for child groooming" is totally a "balme the tool annd not the user" is a fallacy, because gasoline and icecream are not created specifically towards grooming children or arson. Loli porn is specifically for 1 thing - sexualizing underage girls. This is like saying that Heroin is fine because even Vicodin can be used for addiction, as if Heroin being specifically for getting high isn't the difference. The CSA statistic argument is also a fallacy. Not only have recent Japanese crime statistics related to children risen, but the methodology is correlation not causation. Economic and social factors outside are a major influence in how media affects people. >Inb4 muh Britain 1) Japan's economy and repressed culture is, for a major part, the reason rapes are not high in occurrence. Instead the population suffers in other ways, for example people marrying vocaloids and body-pillows, with many males admitting that their first sexual encounters were their mothers etc. etc. 2) japan has literal place where you can hire 16 year old consorts and have them dress as schoolgirls, clearly an influence of anime fetishizations of such underage erotica. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/57eaaf23-0cef-48c8-961f-41f2563b38aa 3) Japan has a far higher HDI, the highest in the world in fact, while Britain is notorious for its poor living conditions compared to the rest of Europe. >Muh morals are subjective But ethics are not. To conclude you're paedophiles in denial. Like I said before, it's the difference between 3rd and 1st degree murder, that's just about it. Oh and BTW a lot of loli hentai artists are known for using real children as a basis as to what they draw for 'realism' which is why, despite the anime-bobblehead effect, the bodies are essentially accurate representations of real children and not petit adults. So fuck off with this 'muh 2D' shit. The only place that has an argument is if you're fapping to something like Lucky Star, where the characters are closer to flat shapes, than actual people.
(27.54 KB 508x395 poop plug.jpg)
>>3002 In regards to the actual paedophile debate For 1 thing puberty being in 12-13 is not quite accurate since puverty BEGINS in those age groups but is far from finished. 1) Societal development and 'civilization' has materially changed things which made sexual maturity and engagement pushed later and later. Thus even by the time of the Roman Empire, girls younger than 14 were not typically involved in real sex even if the upper class engaged in debauchery. The only reason it wasn't higher was because people's life-spans were too short, so baby-making took priority over actually caring for yourself. 2) Paleolithic girls were not the same as modern humans, they had to be ready to be able to have children early because there was a high mortality rate and survivability required earlier reproduction, this placed a lot of stress on females of the time and it is self-evident in their remains. People were essentially disregarded as human beings and just survived the best they could. 3) The beginning of puberty and technical sexual readiness is early, hell in Mexico a literal 9 year old gave birth meaning at age 8 she was sexually able to have kids, but the difference is that while physically they may be able to, they are not ready to do so or endure mentally. Children cannot consent because they do not have the sufficient mental faculties to register things an adult can, that is why child abuse is under-reported, because most children don't know that they are being abused, pic related. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/02/06/mexico-9-year-old-girl-gives-birth/1897407/
>>3004 In regards to some of those reports that you provided, I assume you are German and can speak German, since you provided one in German, said article mentions Richard von Krafft-Ebing, and Krafft mentions that: "He mentions several cases of pedophilia among adult women (provided by another physician), and also considered the abuse of boys by homosexual men to be extremely rare." do you happen to know the exact Krafft makes about pedophilia in adult women? Because from what I seen this comment was largely ignored in the field of sexology. Krafft also says this: "Further clarifying this point, he indicated that cases of adult men who have some medical or neurological disorder and abuse a male child are not true pedophilia and that, in his observation, victims of such men tended to be older and pubescent." Which also kind proves my point regarding 10-12 age attraction.
>>3013 I am not talking about puberty per see but when people are capable of having children, which from what I research is 1 month after menarche, or first menstrual cycle for girls: "Most American girls experience their first period at 11, 12 or 13, but some experience it earlier than their 11th birthday and others after their 14th birthday. In fact, anytime between 8 and 16 is normal." I am also not talking about sexual maturity, but sexual attraction, adult women and men expressing attraction to pubescent children, not the sexual maturity of pubescent children. Life-spans weren't too short in Ancient Rome(or the Bronze Age in general), if you lived past 5 generally you live up to 50-60, life expectancy is not a good indicator for how long people lived generally because life expectancy includes toddler mortality in the equation. I fail to think how a Poor Roman Citizen wouldn't take a young wife and make her pregnant early in order to have more children, though I also saw a research which showed that Romans age of marriage, and about 12% of people married younger than 12, about 68% married around the age of 12 and the rest married older, though I cannot find the article. Though here is some other shit I found while seeing over my history in Discord Chats: "Edward J. Wood says that Thomas Lord Berkley was contracted to a girl who was at the time 7 years old and were to consummate the marriage 4 years later, but due to illness the marriage was consummated the following year" "“By the law of Scotland, a woman cannot contrabere sponsalia before her age of seven years. 1 Rol. 343. I. 20. But by common law, persons may marry at any age. Co. Lit. 33. A. And upon such marriage the wife shall be endowed, if the attain the age of nine years, of what whatsoever age her husband be; but not before the age of nine years. Co. L. 33. A.” [5]" Also, the youngest mother in the world is Lina Medina, who gave birth in Peru when she was 5 years and 7 months old, which means she was able to have kids at the age of 4, really scary stuff.
it don't make no sense to draw a link between lolicon and pedophilia. Anyone than it makes sense to draw a link between violence in videogames and violence in real life. We aren't morons who think Doom is the reason columbine happened. The arrow of causality goes the other way, sometimes violent people use violent games as outlets. If you really thought there was a link between loli and pedos you should think there's a link between all pornography and misogyny for example.* Basically leading to a soviet censorship situation where you're only allowed to make wholesome realism. It's retarded. *as an aside when it comes to pornography generally the argument is an opposite one: "Porn and similar objectifying media(like anime) has given you a false impression of women and makes you unable to connect with real woman" But here somehow loli has such a fidelity to the original that it's the same as CP
>>3012 You dont even know what is the Godwin's law. Lmao, how you reached the conclusion that the doc was my creation? what a retard. >2 My posts, lazy as they were, were plenty analytical and consistent loli is the depiction of a child or child-like body and when used for explicit sexualization this means that YOU are sexualizing a cartoon child. Therefore the only difference to actual paedophilia is it being fictional. However the people who create this and masturbate to this are real. Uh no, youre not sexualizing any type of child, you dont have any method to You have no way of proving your point all you do is repeat your personal opinion as if it were an argument.
(481.02 KB 800x734 ancap logic.png)
>>3029 >there's a link between all pornography and misogyny False equivalency. I'm not linking ALL hentai to all child abuse, I'm saying it can be an influence, which the past years of increased child abuse in Japan is demonstrative of. HOWEVER, pornography in general is consumerist and over-all it is anti-socialist because of how exploitative it is. And some porn does normalize that which would otherwise be disgusted by others. However with Loli you can see them sexualized in common media while porn stays on 18+ sites. The Anime PSA about Lolis gives a very good example of a literal popular school child show where nude loli bodies (of which only the head is unrealistic) are shown and constant idea of sex with older men is brought up. >given you a false impression of women and makes you unable to connect with real woman It does the same with loli, because even pomf.png is only a (demented) romanticism of pedophilia, not an actual reflection of child abuse, however it can spark ideas that lead to such things (i.e. schoolgirl cafes and special regions with really low age-of-consent). >>3031 >You dont even know what is the Godwin's law. >what is the godwin's law <"as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1" You literally made a comparisonwith fascists/nazbols which is Godwin's law at work >youre not sexualizing any type of child >bla bla bla no method Yeah you have no idea what you're talking about, just babbling random rubbish you don't understand. You sound like a horny teen typing with 1 hand LOL.
(68.97 KB 938x477 1599237112354.jpg)
>this whole thread
>>2998 I know a friend which like yaoi and he's not gay... So this normie dosen't even know the community
>>3013 >they are not ready to do so or endure mentally WTF, This is not materialist this return to hegel or is even more idealistic than that. What are you? anarchist?
(67.76 KB 641x680 20200916_121053.jpg)
(542.31 KB 643x509 literally murder.PNG)
people who watch shows about swords where something like this is shown literally are people who want to go outside and stab people dead this here is a very graphic screencap of a fictional person that is modelled after a real one being murdered this is literally the same thing and i cannot differenciate
(7.30 KB 600x464 rape.png)
i have drawn this, it means that i, and anyone looking at it, wants to go out and rape people looking at this image will compell you to rape all characters depicted are 18+
(73.73 KB 720x720 cultural marxism.jpg)
>>3044 >This strawman argument again You got BTFO before with this exact same copy-pasta and exact same image. Violence is not the problem but how it is depicted. What you posted is a demonstration on a dummy, not an actual brutal murder. This is self evident in the differences of depiction and culture in Europe and America. American films are essentially "Fuck yeah violence!!!" and the culture itself reflects this, while in Europe violence is treated with respect. Depicted, but not glorified and this reflects the culture. >inb4 muh videogames strawman There are plenty of studies indicating that VIOLENCE based video-games can provoke aggressive and erratic behaviour. Nobody claims Mario killing Bowser make people violent, they talk about Call of Duty 3 and other desensitizing rubbish like that. I still remember that one kid who decided to try out GTA in real life. Lucky he was a kid and the cops didn't shoootonsight him. Every article speaking about video games and violence (whether defending video-gmaes or not) refer to First person shooters like CoD where you have human enemies that you have to murder the fuck out of to win. It helps create the same deluded mindset as /pol/'s "humans vs Orcs" view on the world. If violent depictions weren't effective why would the CIA spend so much time and money producing garbage movies like Rambo II & III, Red Dawn and other such bullshit? If media didn't affect people, they wouldn't fucking bother it. Hell that was the entire point of They Live's glasses allegory. - Craig A. Anderson and Wayne A. Warburton, “The Impact of Violent Video Games: An Overview,” Growing Up Fast and Furious, 2012 - Craig A. Anderson and Brad J. Bushman, “Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature,” Psychological Science, Sep. 2001 - American Academy of Pediatrics, “Joint Statement on the Impact of Entertainment Violence on Children Congressional Public Health Summit,” AAP website, July 26, 2000 - Mike Jaccarino, “‘Training Simulation:’ Mass Killers Often Share Obsession with Violent Video Games,” foxnews.com, Sep. 12, 2013 - Tracy Dietz, “An Examination of Violence and Gender Role Portrayals in Video Games: Implications for Gender Socialization and Aggressive Behavior,” Sex Roles, 1998 - https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-changing-culture/201212/yes-violent-video-games-do-cause-aggression - Also link to the kid I was talking about: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/11/30/an-11-year-old-played-grand-theft-auto-then-led-cops-on-a-high-speed-chase-in-the-family-car/ - https://www.geek.com/games/new-study-links-video-games-to-brain-damage-1711681/ - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/08/07/playing-shooter-video-games-damages-brain-study-suggests/ - https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/get-psyched/201201/do-violent-video-games-increase-aggression >>3038 >He's not gay <I'm not gay I just read men fucking each other, that's totally not gay!!! <I just like fucking men but no homo! This is like those people who say traps aren't gay >>3043 Start from the root of the problem - normalizing sexualized children. The point was never about "hurting" fictional characters but about how the people who view and "enjoy" such content are essentially escaping into a paedo fantasy... and that is fairly disgusting. >>3039 I can't tell if this is supposed to be ironic or not. Given that it's the same grammatical mash as posted prior, I'm going to reckon that this post is an unironic lack of understanding of psychology and how materialism is not the end-all-be-all of everything. >>3045 Ok strawman, keep ignoring the fact that MEDIA influences people.
>>2909 Do you even know what a repository is?
>>3051 Interesting. This is like max simp mode and 3d lolicon. I approve, as the guy said, very gentlemanly, no harassment. It's not like the girl doesn't know about sex or whatever. The 18 age of consent is very arbitrary and mostly makes sense in badly educated societies in regards to sex. Not to say I approve or disapprove of old men fucking underage women, just that people pretend teenagers discover sex on their 18th birthday. I've seen much more terrible demonstrations of the same in other cultures. I prefer this sterilized and out in the open, as it is here.
>>3055 That is not a teenager though, one thing is also what they shown in the event itself and what actually happens in the backstage, I do agree 18 as the age of consent is overall retard(here it's 14), but to say those shit that happen in Japan is a healthy way of doing and expressing their desire is wrong
>>3055 >I prefer this sterilized and out in the open, as it is here. I thought we hate culture industry here on bunkerchans. To provide closeted pedos actuall 11 year old girl "idols" with still no self-responsibility is cultur-capital at its weirdest if you ask me.
(12.94 MB 4961x7016 megumin_tea.jpg)
>>2865 In short - thought crime. Le Unbelievable Sin. Yeah, that's it. There is no point arguing with such people, they just believe that certain sexual fantasies are just bad and will endlessly develop theories about "Chinese porn cartoons making you a pedo". You can't really be judged for what's inside your head, and you can't be judged for fapping to cartoon characters, be it kids or whatever. Anyone who says otherwise and tries to justify the concept of "thought offence" through obnoxious puritan "cultivation theories", are just wannabe white knights, who want to look better in the eyes of society for basically no effort. This shit is just a cargo cult of late 2000's pedohysteria, reproduced by virtue signalling radlibs and/or conservatives online. Of course they can't catch an actual child molester, so they start attacking harmless artists and their audience, because they unironically think that such sexual fantasy should be prohibited, because it's "indecent" or even "degenerate". Boomer logic and pure moralfaggotry.
(121.67 KB 592x490 normal people vs lolicon.png)
>>3058 Any person of intelligence should never give people like you any quarter, because you give lolicon defenders an inch and they take a mile and soon it's "what's so wrong with CP anyway" bullshit, every fucking time. >Muh thought crimes Typical western idiocy. Lolicon is not just 'thoughts, it is thoughts that are put onto paper/screens and spread to other people. It is not isolated to yourself and does influence other people and not in a good way. >You can't really be judged for what's inside your head <You're the next Chikotlo who just has been repressing themselves because social norms? Don't worry no judging! Don't get help, just 'be yourself' even when it's retarded because that't what 50 years of capitalist propaganda told you. >Anyone who says otherwise <People who say lolicon is bad are dogmatists <I'm totally not dogmatizing 'muh freedoms' when I refuse to accept legitimate criticism LOL >cultivation theories <Imma just ignore the fact that social, economic and political environment influences people and their behaviors. Nobody says that "if you look at a loli you turn into a pedo". The point is that relatively frequent exposure to such things and what they represent influence people. The very concept of Memes proves cultivation theory, since without it, memes would just be captioned images and wouldn't become hot-topics or spread across the internet. >want to look better in the eyes of society <ur a white knight if you think about ethics You sound like an Ancap incel. It's hilarious to claim this when American society and even European society is so obsessed with "liburty!!!!" >anti-degeneracy is 'muh boomers' and 'moralfags' <Hurr anyone who thinks being a hedonist is retarded is 'my parental issues' Ok lib >a cargo cult of late 2000's pedohysteria LOL ok Epstein, all the CP rings and child abuse that keeps getting found 'totally' isn't real. >they can't catch an actual child molester Because they're online, and to catch them you'd have to engage with them and risk being accused of being one instead >they start attacking harmless artists/audiences <social influence is totally harmless, REALLY!!! The point was never about "hurting" fictional characters but about how the people who view and "enjoy" such content are essentially escaping into a paedo fantasy and normalizing child sexualization. Many of these 'artists' often model off REAL children when drawing these hentai doujins. >virtue signalling radlibs <radlibs are literally promoting child sexuality and MAPS pride LOL you're just using leftypol buzzwords to sound smarter >sexual fantasy should be prohibited <fantasizing about a bigheaded kid fucking someone is totally legit because it's not real!!! It's one thing to have some minor fetishes. Foodplay or or foot-fagging or spanking etc. But enjoying shit, literal and figurative is just mentally ill. It's fairly well recognized on leftypol that sexual obsession is a caused by capitalist consumerism, dehumanization and objectification (and more). Sex is so oversaturated and commodified in society that people crave shit that they wouldn't even think of. Horny people will jerk off to anything and only after will they realize that "oh, I just fapped to a picture of a dog fucking an anime girl" or some other shit. >>3051 >>3055 >An edited and clearly glamorized depiction is the same as the actual thing. <It totally isn't a prettified bersion of what is essentially abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai I agree that the age of consent being 18 is excessive, however it exists because until the ages of 16-18 your mind isn't yet fully developed and cannot reliably make smart adult decisions (like consent), partly due to late-stage pubertal hormones. It's why you see teen girls going insane for generic pop singers like Justin Bieber and later look back on it with embarrassment.
>>3058 Exactly. A lot of this stuff is simply art. I don't care if people find it disturbing, but it is art, and if some people get off to it, then good for them. This idea that "well it's still pedophilia" is a red herring. If simply finding this attractive is pedophilia, then it isn't wrong to be a pedophile. It's wrong to be a child molester. And if no children are involved, then I fail to see the harm in it. Enjoy yourselves and remember that socialism is about bettering your life, not turning it into a regimented structure dictated by moral busybodies.
(92.52 KB 599x666 Duck dick bite.jpg)
>>3070 >Create lolipol thread for the sole purpose of provoking argument on the topic and thus get anti-lolicon replies <hey man why you trying to be a busy body maaan? Amazing logic. >spoilering an SFW pic WHY!? You do realize all the anti-lolicon posters have been arguing against SEXUALIZING loli's not actually posting them in general right? >socialism is about bettering your life Socialism is about seizing the means of production and installing a dictatorship of the proletariat which oversees everything within a socialist state, this includes media. It's main purpose is to disarm and remove the capitalist class and its worst products (such as un-necessary commodities and for-profit labour organization/production). This inherently requires a 'regimented structure' regardless of whether you centralize or decentralize the planned economy. You cannot have socialism without moderating the media consumed. >simply art pic related is ART of a nude child. Loli doujins and obviously erotic/pornographic anime grills are not art. They are media, but not art. To call it art would make anything 'art' and would make the word meaningless. >If simply finding this attractive is pedophilia Most people are not attracted to prepubescent children, cartoon or otherwise. This paraphilia is most prevalent in First World where hyperconsumerism drives people to do things that 90% of the rest of the global population would be either confused or disgusted by. >Red Herring If you're not attracted to it being a child-like body, then what is the attraction? It isn't 'just' an anime grill, since there are definitive reasons that make it a LOLI >if no children are involved, then I fail to see the harm in it If we existed in a vacuum maybe.
>>2964 >wherein Japan is hyper-repressed in real life to the point where large portions of men have their first sexual experiences with their own mothers Um..what?? Source? This can't be real
>>3080 I lost the link (I posted it somewhere on 8ch leftyweebpol) but essentially it was an article discussion the fact that Japanese men have so many problems trying to interact and have relationships with women that often their first interactions sexually are realted to their mothers (be it imitating a relationship with them, jerking off to them, being given a handjob/blowjob or outright fucking them). If you search through the waybackarchive of the board you might find the link, I'm too lazy to do it now, since I'm going to sleep and am on my phone.
>>2962 TAKE BACK THE CLAY ANGLOS OUT
>>2964 On a more germane note, how does one square the belief that propaganda affects behaviour and that video games and similar things don't affect behaviour? The recent shooter themed games have been demonstrated to promote revisionist mongering about the Soviets after all.
>>3082 Sex crimes might be underreported in Japan, too.
Someone has to drag Rafiq here so that he could settle this with his sheer ML autism once and for all, once again. Also, stop the bigotry towards the Japs and the trannies, the topic doesn't require it to be productive.
>>3085 >this based >>3086 >also this Society in Japan is very rigid at times, so any domestic abuse is hidden from outside view because it is seen as dishonorable to have others know. t.knowjapanesepeople https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/11/16/national/crime-legal/sex-crimes-japan-still-significantly-underreported-justice-ministry-survey-finds/ >>3088 >bigotry <saying honest truths is bigotry Japanese are very self-repressed. It's well known on this board that the culture itself is highly reactionary despite its advanced HDI. >trannies Literally 2 posts outside of this one and yours talk about "muh trannies" and only refer to them in passing. There is no bigotry in saying that they aren't the norm when they aren't... it's why they're labeled a minority, yeah?
(1.49 MB 1838x1336 1544176731825.jpg)
What about shotas?
So when are we removing this board?
>>3085 It is not that they might not affect behavior, but there is no evidence of this being negative or more pronounced than any other sort of media. Of course, propaganda aims to spread disinformation, depictions of sex or violence in games do not aim to spread disinformation. Violence is portrayed as violence, and sex as sex, whether exaggerated or not. The alternative would be censorship. I, for one, like free expression of the arts. If someone wants to make a lolicon manga, or a violent game, then this is good. It is an outlet for creativity.
>>3074 >hurr I get to decide what art is and isn't BTW, media is just a form of conveying information. Art can be anything. Loli is art. https://exhentai.org/g/662154/d5c164c9b6/ This one is definitely a work of art.
>>3100 >posting sadpanda <being this retarded the sheer irony >Art can be anything <Muh art is subjective PoMoism Go back to reddit >media is just a form of conveying information Information in media is almost never neutral you idiot, it does not exist in a vacuum and has an effect on viewers you dumbass
>>2961 What is happening in GETchan? The url is acting weird.
Did Stalin approve of taking more than one partner? Was inc*st legal in the USSR?
(22.05 KB 640x480 gang shit.jpg)
>>2961 Pic approved by anti-nonce gang
>>2865 I keep seeing this thumbnail from the catalog and think the couch is her spread legs and her actual legs are her panties. I need to lay off the porn
>couch is her spread legs and her actual legs are her panties lolwut
>>2980 >if you actually read the poster I have, retard. If you're taking it seriously, kill yourself. It's tongue and cheek. No serious poster is going to suggest anti-male hormone therapy.
>>3156 they use it for sex offenders
(1.60 MB 1000x1250 moe-rick.png)
Both but it's also about gatekeeping to maintain an image which is just unrealistic when desiring mass numbers because every group, ideology and movement will have variety of interests among people within.
>>3156 Ok retard, stay mad and keep up the dissonance.
>>2962 pathetic Jap worshiper go back to pol retard.
>>3070 >Then it isn't wrong to a podophile You can't make this shit up Lmao
(1.11 MB 305x239 1444459068055.gif)
>>3070 >socialism is about bettering your life >not turning it into a regimented structure dictated by moral busybodies
>retards still arguing all weebs get sent to the gulag japan is a shit country with rightoid culture and anybody who likes anything from there deserves a rope
>nooo stop liking what i don't like cope, gonna keep mentally fucking lolis and there's nothing you can do to stop me short of installing communism, maybe in that kind of society i'd feel bad for liking taboos instead of loving them just look at this very american clown hot bod
>>3172 >>3171 >reddit spacing >edgy contrarianism Ok samefag bait-poster, stay salty.
>>3174 don't lump me together with that "day of the rope" faggot
(25.91 KB 596x582 1551447830337.jpg)
>>3172 >>3175 you won't escape the gulag
>>3175 You're the same coin, just different sides, fagorino
>>3178 >both sides no just you and this larping impotent faggot here >>3177
>>3180 Sure bud, sure, keep projecting.
>>3175 Post more of American clown girl from touhou that I forgot
I guess its true what they say about western middle class 'leftists'... Fucking kill yourselves
>>3194 I agree. Only middle class kiddies could care so much about drawings so as to make a stink about it.
>>3207 >TFW I ask my poor immigrant Mexican co-worker about what he thinks of loli and lolicons and he says they should be dismembered Ok faggot.
>>3208 refuse to believe anyone would be autistic enough to bring up loli irl
>>3209 Ok sure. People totally don't talk about anime IRL... even though we have literal animecons, cosplays and all sorts of shit in public.
(228.57 KB 500x357 lain_smug.png)
>>2903 Don't need to refer to a supposedly platform the DPRK would build if they had the capabilities. What you want is actually Google! Youtube for video, gmail for emails, google maps for location services, etc. Just have Google gobble up more of the web and your dream of a centralized internet will be fullfilled! And the execs will then be able to impose the ethical laws that you believe are so needed in the virtual world. Wouldn't that be wonderful!?
(70.18 KB 720x597 ok retard.jpg)
>>3213 >Socialism should have central control <Hurr you want corporatism How do you misinterpret things this badly... and of course a Lain-fag is being smug about their own stupidity.
>>3193 she's Clownpiece because I want a piece of that clown butt >>3194 this, western SJW-types should find better things to worry about than the apparent age of fucking drawings >>3208 <TFW I ask my poor very religious neighbor about gay porn and he says they should all burn great "argument", shitforbrains
>>3216 incel
>>3217 volcel, I don't hate women nor do I believe any of the other incel shit
>>3216 >western SJW-types LOL Westernoids are the majority of those who support Loli-shit faggot. >muh drawings!!! Already addressed. faggot >great "argument" <Hurr ur middleclass moralfags >poor person of non First-World delusion is brought up as an example <Hurr let me bring up a false equivelancy Ok pedo, you sound like those capitalist bootlickers who say that if you're poor and hate capitalism, you're jealous, if you're rich and hate it then you don't know what you're talking about. Fuck yourself
>>3219 >volcel, I don't hate women nor do I believe any of the other incel shit so, an incel
(170.49 KB 777x840 anime.png)
>>3222 >is such an incel he has to literally cope by regressing to non threatening child-like paraphernalia fetishization of fictional cartoons given how repulsive he is to real adult women and threatened by them >n-no y-you're the one coping
>>3224 >has to invent a neat little delusional narrative for people liking things he doesn't like >>n-no y-you're the one coping
>>3225 >little delusional narrative you literally admitted you're incel Feel free to explain where I'm wrong tho
>>3227 >literally admitted you just literally admitted to being a delusional moron with a mind so tiny that in order to comprehend and remember things he has to distort reality feel free to point out exactly where I admitted to being an https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=incel tho
>>3230 >>3219 are you not involuntarily celibate? describe where this description of you is wrong: >>3224 (feel free to substitute "incel" with whatever neologism for incel you fancy)
>>3234 you seem to be very low IQ and mentally ill like most pedos (hence also the compulsive spam and inability to read basic english). I'll ask again in more clear terms: >do you define yourself as "volcel" instead of "incel" due to the negative connotations of the term per this link:https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=incel or not?
>>3235 at this point I'm starting to think you just want me to post more hot Clownpiece >negative connotations of the term are you trying to imply that all celibates are automatically incels? already said I don't hate women or any of the other retarded incel bullshit, and I really really don't care about your moronic opinion on me >muh low IQ <demands others fit neatly into simple labels otherwise gets terribly confused
(27.24 KB 625x626 dis gon be gud.jpg)
>>3222 >muh anecdotal example <N-no you can't tell me that ordinary people think 2D pedos are pedos!!!! LOL, stay mad >>3225 >>3230 >>3234 >>3238 Not even that dude but holy shit this level of bait-swallowing COPE is hilarious.
>>3238 is your CELIBACY due to a PERSONAL choice or due to an EXTERNAL factor (i.e. women being unwilling to date you)? it's not hard
(90.14 KB 1200x841 Waifuism cancer.jpg)
>>3240 His 'celibacy' is because he's unironically pic related only with lolis, rather than a single waifu
>>3239 >bait so we agree that other guy is (pretending to be) a moron >>3240 my choice while having to live in capitalism >>3242 >relationship with anime how does that even work? they aren't real you know
(214.33 KB 345x336 funny.jpg)
>>3246 >capitalism is the reason I'm incel
Imagine having hundreds and hundreds of low quality, clearly hyper sexualized, clearly prepubescent drawings of young girls and thinking "this is a normal activity and not the expression of warped libidinal impulses from a socially stunted NEET"
>>3246 >we agree that other guy He's baiting you with low-effort accusations of being an incel. You respond with equally idiotic "U-ur wrong" posts. >>3249 /thread
>>3246 Are you perhaps a girl? Considering that what you have seems to be mostly yuri pics of Clownpiece I assume you're a female anon
>>3249 The dick likes what it likes. Some people fap to lolis, one guy to pictures of tiles. As long as they aren't hurting anybody, I really don't give a shit. Freedom of expression is hugely important. Let me ask you, what do you think of ero-guro stuff? I don't find it sexually appealing, but I do like it a lot. Does that make me more likely to be a murderer, or is it just art?
>>3257 Not that guy, but... Blatantly unmarxist, the dick doesn't just like it, we live in a society and there are societal consequences. Liking lolis is nowhere in our dna. You miss the point. This other guy is saying that this behaviour is a consequence of a certain situation many internet autists find themselves in within capitalist society. >It's freedom of expression to have and masturbator to thousands of photos of cartoon children Yeah na I wouldn't say it necessarily makes you more likely to be a murderer but it has long rooted consequences to how you view the world, and women in particular. We wouldn't continue to produce marvel films under communism because the values would not exist, I suspect the same for whatever obscure anime fetishes exist. (This isn't to say I don't have obscure anime fetishes, however I won't consider it a right, or a fundamental freedom to wank to fucked up doujins)
>>3259 >Liking lolis is nowhere in our dna. Yet a cursory search will reveal that it might indeed have physiological origins. Pedophilia has been with humans since the dawn of time, and ephebophilia isn't considered abnormal. >Yeah na So drawing art you like and sharing it isn't freedom of expression? Then define this for me. Maybe I'm stupid. >but it has long rooted consequences to how you view the world, and women in particular. No, it doesn't. I just think they're pretty, like how I think polished machinery is pretty. >We wouldn't continue to produce marvel films under communism because the values would not exist But if someone wanted to, you wouldn't seek to stop them, yes? >This isn't to say I don't have obscure anime fetishes, however I won't consider it a right, or a fundamental freedom to wank to fucked up doujins) The only real complete freedom you have only exists in 5hose few cubic centimeters inside your skull. If you don't have the freedom to think fucked up shit and masturbate to it, then what freedom do you have? Freedom of thought and expression are fundamental.
The marxist/unmarxist move isn't about whether liking loli is in our genes but how our actions arise in a particular class structure. Same thing as labor. Is it in our genes to work 12 hours making jeans in a factory? Doesn't matter, the point is about what creates and maintains such an arrangement in the first place, to point out that regardless of the true/false status of an underlying necessity to work, the expression that work takes on in a society is reflective of very human decisions and interests. In the case of capitalism, these human interests are only the interests of a small minority, the bourgeoisie. how does loli fit into this? idk i don't really care, i just wanted to clear up the misconception of what marxism claims and how its analysis works.
>>3262 >The word ephebophilia existing in a post with zero irony whatsoever Yikes >Drawing art u like Reductionism, you can do better. >I think a loli is pretty like polished machinery This post is directed at you dude >>3249 >If I can't be pedo, what's the point in living? At that point there are no freedoms left! Jesus Christ is this the best you pro-loli fags got? >>3263 It's very important that we acknowledge that these things aren't essential. Unless you wish to argue blacks are inherently violent? (A leap, but bear with me). To accept that one's pedophilia is genetic, like the other guy said, is to remove the blame from one's perversion. It is very clear pedos are made, maybe some have a 'higher susceptiblity' (we cannot know really) to the social conventions which 'force them' into pedophilia, but we can see this by how many pedophiles were abused as kids. It is a cycle that needs to be nipped in the bud. But this still misses the point for us Marxists , even if something is "biological" it is still subject for our analysis and destruction. That is the point of Marxism, to change history. And the Marxist must lead by example showing the discipline and autonomy to not wank to depictions of children. You are correct, but this level of disgusting essentialism still needs to be refuted wherever it pops up.
(47.20 KB 720x703 ELA50vdXYAA2lGc.jpg)
>>3246 >>3262 >Yet a cursory search will reveal that it might indeed have physiological origins. Pedophilia has been with humans since the dawn of time
(31.04 KB 669x392 you gulag yes.jpg)
(3.67 MB 310x162 WALL.gif)
>>2865 >Why a lot of leftists hate lolis? Decadence Pedophiles get the wall and are more likely to be fashoids anyway, so good riddance
>>3266 >hates lolis >posts nkvd ironic I say
>>2870 >Go outside and engage in real life <N-no, ur spooked Comedy >>3262 >cursory search will reveal that it might indeed have physiological origins No. A cursory search will find that puberty begins early and therefore some level of attraction to teens and pubertal kids may exist. prepubertal children and especially undeveloped ones are not in this category, which make up a large portion of child-abuse and pedoshit >ephebophilia isn't considered abnormal <Literally posting the MS-Paint meme unironically LOL, you do realize that as HUMAN BEINGS we changed and formed societies by trying to have control over ourselves and rejecting practices that are barbaric as we progress, that is a major part of dialectics. >drawing art you like and sharing it isn't freedom of expression <Implying some digital CP is somehow 'art' The idea of "subjective art" is western-fag bullshit. Also <Muh Freedumz! You're about 1 step away from crying Freeze Peach. > I just think they're pretty, like how I think polished machinery is pretty Thinking they're 'pretty' and thinking 'their sexy' are very different things. A flower is pretty, but it isn't sexy. >No, it doesn't The effects of normalizing child sexualization are already visible and posted here in the thread, so yes it does. >if someone wanted to, you wouldn't seek to stop them It would certainly be edited to some extent. And the example is general. Marvel films are a minor offense. Petty and mostly lackling ideological bullshit or other idiocy. Lolicon is just straight up porn and has no artistic value and does not reflect the values of civilized society. >If you don't have the freedom to think fucked up shit and masturbate to it, then what freedom do you have That's not freedom that's just being a libertine.
>>3267 >ironic In what way? Have you been watching too many klyukva movies? >>3263 >>3264 >>3265 based
Pedophilia isn't an abberation it's the default, read History of Sexuality. Doesn't make it correct because its natural, but its empirically observed in preclass societies. Irrelevant all the same, there's yet to be any link drawn between lolicon and child abuse. The best the moralists ITT can do is talk about 'normalization', which we should all be aware is liberal B.S. usually brought up to scold people for making rape jokes. Culture is downstream from politics and production. If you want to be against rape and racism, change material conditions, don't censor video games or insist on artistic quotas, that doesn't do anything except alienate you from everyday people that live in the conditions that express themselves in culture. You need a certain economic privilege to be able to agree with the theory that its possible to diminish oppression through cultural control, this is because the ability to control culture takes capital in the first place. You create a bubble to live in and believe its a utopia due to your pure actions and policing of language/loli. When it's really just money letting you do that.
>>3271 >Pedophilia isn't an abberation it's the default, read History of Sexuality. Doesn't make it correct because its natural, i don't think this is true though, in the middle ages marriages were actually done between two adults. people marrying into 8 year olds was mainly reserved between royal marriages of two princes or w/e. i haven't read that book but i'd like to see what age of society you're referring to
>>3272 not marriages with children of course, but sexual play between adults and prepubescents was typical.
>>3271 >it's the default Uh no, it's not. It occurring is more a demonstration of lack of ethics in the past than a norm of nature. We don't see this behavior in almost any other animal except individuals that tend to be disturbed (such as male elephants who had their mothers killed by poachers and attempt to rape rhinos and adolescent/baby elephants) >empirically observed in preclass societies Because until the modern age, life-span was shit. This was already covered. And besides Foucalt was a fucking closet pedo himself so of course he'd argue it was "natural".
>>3262 >History of Sexuality Ah yes the completely historically nonsensical book by pederast Michel Foucalt who campaigned for the age of consent laws to be scrapped in france and ultimately died of AIDS.
>>3275 >believe in AIDS his every other opinion is discarded
>>3271 So people who are antipedo are >Moralfags >Libs >Economicaly privileged >Utopians >Language policing I am so very thankful 99.9% of proles find you literally the worst human possible. You better not let this level of retardation out in public, talk to normal people, go outside. Literally the only argument in this thread, and I mean LITERALLY is that "wanking to depictions of children doesn't mean you're a pedo", do you not see the sheer retardation of such a statement? >foucalt Oh don't worry it all makes sense now...
(77.58 KB 681x542 1491537083946.jpg)
>>3276 Kissinger invented AIDS to depopulate Africa it's on record
>>3262 I would like to just emphasise here the absolute brain rot of the libertarian socialist (assuming you're soc at all), the sheer cognitive incapabilities required to type out that the only freedoms that exist are the freedoms to be a pedo. Absolutely gob smacking. Not only do they believe that this degenerate freedom (and I am by no means sexually conservative) is necessary, they believe it is a form of expression like we're in highschool art and everyone gets a gold star. The fact you worry about people taking your "mental greedums" (something that LITERALLY cannot happen, you are free to think what you think) instead of the fact you keep collections of naked depictions of children. Instead of looking inwards and deciding if this is positive behaviour of a communist, someone that lives in a society they have deemed requires forced change, they want to defend pedophilia as natural. This opinion IS fascist. You cannot excuse your problems because you believe they are 'natural', it's been made clear that communists are about destroying such silly chains that hold humans back. This meme, while stupid because of the lgbt flat, is correct. >>3265 For 99% of human history women have been literal sex slaves, this would excuse no behaviour of mine to mistreat a fellow comrade today. You are not a communist. You are incapable until you let go of this addiction to little children, it isn't about creating your perfect little freedom world where you can objectify fellow comrades to your heart's content. This behaviour is anti social, much in the way private property is, and it will be ruthlessly crushed when the revolution comes.
>>3264 >Yikes Not an argument. I was responding to the idea that pedophilia is a social I'll, when it is clearly of biological origins. >Reductionism, you can do better. This is a non response as well. And it is a standard wokescold line. Do better sweetie. >think a loli is pretty like polished machinery I was talking about ero-guro there. Way to be illiterate.
(843.14 KB 2549x1338 Capture.JPG)
>>3276 >>3283 >ero-guro thank you for your input, we'll let you know.
>>3269 >>3268 >No. A cursory search will find that puberty begins early and therefore some level of attraction to teens and pubertal kids may exist. prepubertal children and especially undeveloped ones are not in this category, which make up a large portion of child-abuse and pedoshit Clear that you didn't even bother to google. I was referring to the biological state of the pedophile. >LOL, you do realize that as HUMAN BEINGS we changed and formed societies by trying to have control over ourselves and rejecting practices that are barbaric as we progress, that is a major part of dialectics. This is an argument for not fucking young girls, which I agree is sound. It is not an argument for not being attracted to them. This wouldn't even make any sense in this context. And it is definitely not an argument to stop someone from making art depicting such acts. >Digital cp Cp is bad because it harms children. A drawing involves only adults. Call it what you want, but this is like a vegan arguing against synthetic meat because it looks and tastes like meat. >The idea of "subjective art" is western-fag bullshit. Then give a formal definition for art. >You're about 1 step away from crying Freeze Peach. Do socialists not need freedom of expression? I would think they do. >Thinking they're 'pretty' and thinking 'their sexy' are very different things. A flower is pretty, but it isn't sexy. I was referring to a different art type. And why does it matter. Would it be wrong if I did then find it sexy? Can I like loli aesthetically, then? Would I be wrong to masturbate to ero-guro? >The effects of normalizing child sexualization This has never been borne out in statistics related to these acts. This is no better than the anti-game screeds of the 90s. >It would certainly be edited to some extent So you believe in censorship of art. Good to know. >Lolicon is just straight up porn and has no artistic Strongly disagree, and you are not the arbiter of art. Pornography is very much art. >That's not freedom that's just being a libertine. Freedom to you is censorship and control. And I don't see how that is lolbert at all. It certainly isn't an argument for capitalism.
>>3274 >Because until the modern age, life-span was shit. This was already covered. This is really stupid. Life expectancy doesn't mean people died at 40. It means high child mortality rate. If you made it to 10 years old, you were likely going to make it to 60. This is not why certain things were the way they were.
>>3279 This sound like a pastor scolding me. And make no mistake, the art I like is offensive to 99% of the American population. However, as long as they want to be free to make their art, music, and films, to protest and to demand openly that things be done for them, they will have to respect my right to do the same. People may hate what I like, but they will defend my right to it. Only authoritarian socialists and fascists seek to end freedom of expression for the general population. You don't have to believe I'm a socialist, but people will listen to me far more than someone who outright tells them they need to be censored.
(184.27 KB 1125x1324 EZ7ylgkXQAIP7YM.jpg)
>>3285 >>3287 are you lost sweeties?
>>3285 >Clear that you didn't even bother to google Actually I did, since I've been engaging this thread from the start. >referring to the biological state of the pedophile LOL >not an argument for not being attracted to them It is an argument for that because society didn't just up and decide that "hey, fucking minors is bad". Evolution is part of this, its the same reason we have sexual dimorphism and why gender roles developed in society. These are the kind of social constructs based on material reality. >A drawing involves only adults <this again For the last fucking time. We do not exist in a vacuum and neither does porn. 1) lolishit is so easy to find as to be easily available on many boorus, hentai sites and chans, so any kid can wander on and get eye-fucked 2) It NORMALIZES it and affects others. >a vegan arguing against synthetic meat because it looks and tastes like meat Synthetic meat is still meat, just grown artificially, so this theoretical vegan is not being a hypocrite here. >a formal definition for art The general and simple definition given; the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination in visual form. Pornography takes little creative skill and given that people will fap to literal circles, no technical skill either. There is no real imagination outside of "SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX!!!". It's thoughtless lust influenced by the environment people live in. As we so have it, the environment of current society is hypersexual because sex sells in capitalism. An ordinary hentai is literally just fucking. There is nothing there, just one-handed keystrokes put onto a screen. > Would it be wrong if I did then find it sexy <(you) see a child drawing and think it's sexual and that's 'totally 'not weird right? Absolutely barking >Would I be wrong to masturbate to ero-guro The fuck does ero-guro have to do with literal loli porn you fuck? You're shifting the topic >So you believe in censorship of art Without some censorship we get schlock. Read Adorno, lolbert. >You're not the arbiter of art ok holier-than-thou faggot, nice fallacy >Pornography is very much art Nope. I can write an essay about this is a shit-take, but instead I'll repost something from before. Art is, by design, created to stimulate human emotion; an aesthetic feeling that move us humans beyond reality and place us in a state of enamoring bliss. Porn, on the other hand, was created to stimulate our base sexual desires and ONLY those. Its main goal is to profit from persons by fulfilling these ravenous, animal-like, simplistic desires. Art strives for something more. That said, expressing the sex act MAY be an aide to art. Suppose a sex scene in a film. If a scene representing the sex act is made to convey a message (The Bible's Song of Songs), express a character's situation/personality (Schindler's List) or present stronger, darker undertones (Song of Saya), then these may be considered art, since they are concerned with putting the viewer in an aesthetic state of mind, rather than satisfying carnal desire. If the goal of a scene IS satisfying an audience's libido, it is pornography, and it is tasteless >It certainly isn't an argument for capitalism Capitalism's main ideology is by default "muh freedoms" the part about freedom to exploit and oppress through market rule going omitted. >Freedom to you is censorship and control Freedom of expression has no definition when there is nothing to contrast it. Freedom on its own is a nebulous concept that lacks no ideology. The SS was also free in its slaughter of innocents. Would you suggest that nazis ought to go uncensored and free to spread their toxic ideology? >>3286 >If you made it to 10 years old, you were likely going to make it to 60 <which is why in places that retained medieval levels of development like Czarist Russia, the average predicted lifespan was often 32 years give or take a decade. Can you not spout bullshit for one minute >child mortality Nigga this is my job description, high child mortality rates are usually caused by conditions in which the weak do not survive well, the weak also including many old people. There is a reason 60 year old people were considered OLD and not elderly as we do today. >>3287 >Only authoritarian socialists Socialism by definition is authoritarian you dolt. DICTATORSHIP of the proletariat. >Muh red fascists neck yourself >people will listen to me far more The people who will listen to you are those who just want 'muh freedumz' and don't stop to think. Given that Lenin and many other Revolutionary leaders did espouse ideas on censorship and were popular, this argument holds no water. If that were the case political conservatives like the GOP would never get any support. >pastor Maybe you ought to fucking listen, because at this point, I think the pastor is more of a socialist than you.
>>3290 >Nigga this is my job description *is IN my job description. Population bio includes people.
(46.44 KB 698x525 Dwaot2jUwAAjpKK.jpg)
>>3290 >>Only authoritarian socialists Socialism by definition is authoritarian you dolt. DICTATORSHIP of the proletariat. >Muh red fascists neck yourself >people will listen to me far more The people who will listen to you are those who just want 'muh freedumz' and don't stop to think. Given that Lenin and many other Revolutionary leaders did espouse ideas on censorship and were popular, this argument holds no water. If that were the case political conservatives like the GOP would never get any support. >pastor Maybe you ought to fucking listen, because at this point, I think the pastor is more of a socialist than you I mean when literally the entire historical polical spectrum disagrees with you except "libertarians" in the latter part or the 20th century in *some* western capitalist countries, is your argument even worth listening to
>>3293 great bunkerchan fked up my greentexting
What's C.W.C. been up to this year?
>>3171 ackshually the age of consent thing is a meme. the defacto age of consent in Japan is around the same as most countries defacto ages
>>3293 >DICTATORSHIP of the proletariat Why is it that talkies always bring this up as a justification of violating workers' rights? Dictatorship of the proletariat means the oppression if capital, not the average laborer.
(68.33 KB 711x436 capitalpunishment.PNG)
>>3392 Read the Summa Theologiae
>>3269 >In what way? bro...
>>3287 That's all you have to say... Wow. >Socialism that doesn't let me be a pedo=fascism Who the fuck let the vaushoids in? >Pedophilia is expression Again? Is your brain broken? Have you got any actual arguments? So real CP is allowed if it's shot like French cinema? I don't need to believe anything. I KNOW you're not a socialist. You do not have what it takes to create any sort of revolution if you are unable to stop looking at loli shit. The fact you consider it such a right is inately bourgeois and disgusting. >People will listen to me Good luck with that KEK, like I have said 99.999% of proles would rather you dead. You mean pedos will listen to you. So good luck with your pedo movement, honestly, you will need it.
>>3392 >The word 'tankies' >"Workers rights to own child porn" Vaush pls
>>3394 I agree with Aquinas here, anti-loli should be killed for the sake of wellbeing of society.
>>3407 this. anti-loli is pure reactionary retardation
(200.26 KB 1024x599 1500053341751.jpg)
>>3407 >>3407 >>3407 >>3408 what makes pedos so brazen and shameless? is it the mental illness? Aquinas would have both of you burned in the public square yet you taunt us suchwise Knowing fully if either the far right or far left won that would be your inescapable fate, and your only solace is this decant capitalist system
>>3410 decadent*
>>3410 So quick to say that far-left would agree to burning people who have done nothing wrong based solely on their sexual orientation. Maybe that's just you and the far-right. https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/pedophilia-sexual-orientation https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pessimism-about-pedophilia
>>3392 >justification of violating workers' rights <Workers rights is when some closeted 2D pedos making up a tiny portion of the population demand the right for drawn CP to be spread to everyone, even when most of them dislike it. >>3391 1) Where does age of consent come into this. the post you reply to isn't talking aout that specifically 2) The average is 16 in Japan with remote areas being 14. However there are 'cafes' and other shit that allow for men to ogle and grope underagers. >>3407 >>3408 >N-no, I'm not a lolbert who wants the right to diddle fictional kids you're just a fascist! >>3413 >Harvard <Muh sexual orientation Ok Epstein >far-left would agree to burning people Radical liberal burgers who suck up to minorities are not the far left. <and the far-right *Ehem* Suuuuure >>>/leftypol/859777
>>2958 always has been
>>3177 but Stalin was a pedo
>>3405 >That's all you have to say... Wow. There's nothing much to say. Your arguments boil down to you liking dictatorships. >Again? Is your brain broken? Have you got any actual arguments? So real CP is allowed if it's shot like French cinema? No, we're talking about drawings, sculptures, and so on. But nudity on film isn't that weird. There are videos of me as a child running naked around the house. Should my parents be arrested for having them? >Good luck with that KEK, like I have said 99.999% of proles would rather you dead. But I'm not into pedo shit. It just so happens that I understand the need to preserve their freedom of expression. You know many lolicon artists don't masturbate to their work, right? To them, it's just art.
>>3406 >Vaush Is he the new boogeyman? His takes on socialism can be retarded, but he is effective. How many people have you brought to the left?
>>3414 ><Workers rights is when some closeted 2D pedos making up a tiny portion of the population demand the right for drawn CP to be spread to everyone, even when most of them dislike it. This is freedom of expression. I am no more in favor of banning their stuff as I am for banning depictions of gay sex, zoophilia, rape, straight sex, or god-forbid, hand-holding. >I'm not a lolbert who wants the right to diddle fictional kids you're just a fasci Well you can't diddle fictional kids. So there's that. It's funny that you have to ascribe a political ideology that I do not hold so you can feel comfortable, since you can't actually make a positive argument for why censorship needs to be the goal.
>>The Tsutomu Miyazaki Case (also known as "The Saitama Prefecture Multiple Child Rape-Murder Case) >>Between August 1988 and June 1989, four pre-school school girls became missing in Saitama Prefecture. Here is an overall review of what happened: >>August 22, 1988 - Imano Mari (age four) was kidnapped, raped and murdered. Video taped Mari-chan's corpse and vagina. (video tape found at his house as evidence). Dumped and buried body in forest. >>October 3, 1988 - Miyazaki asked Yoshizawa Masami (age seven) for directions, and promised her to take her somewhere "nice." Masami started crying inside Miyazaki's car, and Miyazaki: "I had no choice but to strangle her to shut up." After she took her final breath, Miyazaki: "I took her clothes off and put my finger into her vagina, but her body moved even though she was dead...I became scared I left the body in the forest" >>December 9, 1988 - Namba Erika (age four) kidnapped, raped, and strangled. Dumped body in a forest. >>December 15, 1988 - Erika's body found in forest by police investigators. >>January, 1989 - Miyazaki returns to Mari-chan's burial site, took her skull back home, burned it to ashes at his home incinerator. Sends Mari-chan's ashes to her parents in a cardboard box with a letter enclosed with newspaper letters of 「真理・遺骨・焼・証明・鑑定」 (Mari, Ikotsu, Yaki, Shoumei, Kantei / Mari, Body Ashes, Burned, Evidence, Proof) >>February 10, 1989 - Miyazaki sends additional letters to Asahi Daily News and Mari-chan's distressed families (once again with newspaper letters) explaining in vivid detail how he killed and raped little Mari-chan. >>March 11, 1989 - Miyazaki learns of Mari-chan's funeral. Sends another letter to the Imano family and Asahi Daily News "I deeply appreciate the proper burial that you were able to provide her that I could not." Public anger explodes. >>June 6, 1989 - Nomoto Ayako (age five) kidnapped. Miyazaki: "after she kept on repeatedly inquiring about my deformed hands, I became frustrated and killed her." Body (minus legs and arms) dumped in forest. Video taped himself masturbating (once again, video tape found at his home later) with Ayako's hands, then ate them. >>July 23, 1989 - As Miyazaki was video taping a crying naked girl (age six) in a forest, he was apprehended by the girl's father. He was taken to the police station for attempted kidnapping and rape. Miyazaki confesses to his crimes. >>Police searches Miyazaki's house: over 6000 video tapes of anime, lolita videos, and horror films
>There is no better expression of predatory male desire, than pedophilia, which in pathological terms is the same as sexual attractiveness toward a literal object. The object of the pedophile's desire, the child, there is nothing reciprocal in the meaningful sense about this relationship - it is no wonder Freud identified pedophilia with sexual attraction toward objects. More disgustingly, unlike a relationship between two fully constituted subjects, love is impossible between an adult and a child, for the first condition of love is precisely what is absent in this relationship: And that is its active reciprocation, or at least its recognized possibility (It is the possibility that the other may also love me back that I can continue to love them).
>>3423 So we should ban anime and horror films too?
>>3423 Ah, yes, the deformed loner with uncaring parents who mentioned in his confession that he felt abandoned and ignored. It was definitely the anime, and not his upbringing. Surely the "Moral Panic" section of his wikipedia page is a more accurate representation. If we're going by this standard, I guess we should euthanize all socially awkward people as well as any suffering deformities which might cause their peers to ignore them. After all, millions of Otaku lived around the same time not doing any murders as well as social rejects. The only solution is to get rid of them. After all, if it saves one life, it's worth it.
>>3424 >love is impossible between an adult and a child But I love my mama. Jk, child molestation is shit, but nobody is arguing for that here.
(60.77 KB 1024x768 workers join degenerates!.jpg)
>>3420 >Your arguments boil down to you liking dictatorships <Being socialist is about muh freedumz, even though the theory clearly states otherwise But sure, I'm just "le uthoritarian" LOL >>3420 >There are videos of me as a child running naked around the house Nice false equivalency. Repoosting: Art is, by design, created to stimulate human emotion; an aesthetic feeling that move us humans beyond reality and place us in a state of enamoring bliss. Porn, on the other hand, was created to stimulate our base sexual desires and ONLY those. Its main goal is to profit from persons by fulfilling these ravenous, animal-like, simplistic desires. Art strives for something more. That said, expressing the sex act MAY be an aide to art. Suppose a sex scene in a film. If a scene representing the sex act is made to convey a message (The Bible's Song of Songs), express a character's situation/personality (Schindler's List) or present stronger, darker undertones (Song of Saya), then these may be considered art, since they are concerned with putting the viewer in an aesthetic state of mind, rather than satisfying carnal desire. If the goal of a scene IS satisfying an audience's libido, it is pornography, and it is tasteless >I understand the need to preserve their freedom of expression Ok liberal, and the nazis should have their freeze peach bla bla bla, next. >>3417 Ok glownigger >>3422 >This is freedom of expression Nebulous undefined bullshit >banning depictions of gay sex, zoophilia, rape <straight sex, or hand-holding. Imagine equating a vanilla majority thing to fucking minority sexual deviancies MFW. >you can't diddle fictional kids Quit being obtuse faggot. >you have to ascribe a political ideology I don't have to ascribe one to "feel comfortable". Socialism isn't an "everyone is cool" club where any randos can come and project their own personal shit into the movement. The Communist Party isn't a Social Club, a minority or gay advocates rights group, or some shitty Mac Store where your faggot boss wears a Turtleneck sweater and asks you if you've had a good fuck; it’s a group dedicated to socialist discussion and thought. Defending "Muh freedom for loli hentai" is fucking retarded and unsocialist, and such people are not comr8s, but libertarians LARPing as leftists. >can't actually make a positive argument for why censorship needs to be the goal What utter cope. 1) Censorship is not the goal you fucktard it is a means to the goal - transitioning into socialism and then into communism. 2) Censorship of decadent capitalist ideology and its mindless consumptive motivations is required and part of what the Dictatorship of the Proletariat uses to de-fang upper class influence 3) As stated in the above reposted excerpt, there is no value to this porn and all it does is normalize disgusting ideas created and propagated by a capitalist market aimed at sexually unsatisfied first-worlders made by sexually disturbed mangaka who often study real children for their doujins. All of these are points I have made repeatedly, but sure it's cause "muh evul totalitarians!!!", Never mind that Losurdo debunked this years ago. >>3426 >total lack of censorship is good!!! Two words: Quality Control. Nobody who sees Nightmare on Elm Street or Friday the 13th is going to want to become a serial killer unless they're already disturbed, but there are numerous other films that take mutilation and "horror" and trivialize it into 'fun'. It's so normalized that Western Audiences (who are the ones who see this) are utterly desensitized to violence and its consequences. When you're a fucking Hikki-Otaku watching constant casual violence, rape and other shit, they are certainly affected.
>>3430 >But sure, I'm just "le uthoritarian" LOL You are, and theory does not agree with you. You just really like Stalin. We get it, you like dictators. >Nice false equivalency. Repoosting: Art is, by design, created to stimulate human emotion Lust is an emotion. You've already failed. The rest isn't even worth reading. >Ok liberal, and the nazis should have their freeze peach bla bla bla, next. Sure. Nazis can say all they want. It's when they start organizing that it becomes a problem, and then people should be the ones to put them in check. You do realize the problem with Nazis isn't that they talk about their ideas, right? >Nebulous undefined bullshit The freedom to express your thoughts out in the open without reprisal from government. Seems pretty well-defined and straight-forward. >Imagine equating a vanilla majority thing to fucking minority sexual deviancies MFW. You'll notice I included gay sex there too. I guess you don't like the gays either. You seem to think sexuality is a function of society, so maybe you think gays should be reformed too. >Socialism isn't an "everyone is cool" club where any randos can come and project their own personal shit into the movement. The Communist Party isn't a Social Club >muh seekrit kids club Kek. No wonder you people never get any traction. >Censorship is not the goal you fucktard it is a means to the goal Censorship in no way helps you achieve communism. You're just an authoritarian. It would be one thing if you said that capitalist firms and individuals should be muffled by taking away their media outlets and so on. It's another to say that making a drawing online should be illegal. You just find it icky and want to use state power for your own ends. This is a personal problem. >there is no value to this porn and all it does is normalize disgusting ideas There is definitely artistic value in pornography, and what you find disgusting isn't what others find disgusting. You just feel icky, and that's okay. Learn to deal with it. Normalization is also bullshit, by the way. Pornography isn't even correlated with sexual assault, nor are violent films, nor is lolicon with prevalence of child molestation. >Quality Control. You don't get to decide what is or isn't quality. If it's to be art, then let the artist determine that themselves. Most manga artists are one-man operations, and the online erotic art community is certainly that. You are not the arbiter of art, and cannot define it without running into contradictions. This is as bad as Ben Shapiro saying that Rap isn't music because it makes him feel bad about WAP. Get over yourself, and understand that your moral proclivities are just that: yours. The rest of the world will get on just fine with artistic expression under socialism. We don't need you to police how we do things.
>>3424 Eternally based Rafiq poster
(39.80 KB 500x400 a char.gif)
Read Galbraith, you reddit refugees.
(121.67 KB 592x490 normal people vs lolicon.png)
>>3431 >theory does not agree with you Yes it does, as do real life examples (Lenin and the Prostitutes anyone?) >Muh Stalin dictator Ok reddit spacing liberal >Lust is an emotion Lust is not an emotion, it is a feeling; a strong sexual desire. Arousal is also a feeling but is again not an emotion. SO nice faild >not worth reading <I have no argument so I'll nitpick typical >Nazis can say all they want Yep, you're a dumbass "freedumz" liberal, what in hell are you doing on this site? Get back to your safespace. >when they start organizing that it becomes a problem <Nazis can say what they want but not act on their words, even though acting on their ideology is inevitable and spreading their ideology can attract people to it. Have you learned nothing from history? Glasnost? Weimar Germany? This is the kind of rhetoric that would get you fragged by any socialist movement, be it the USSR or the Cubans or even the Anarchists. You do realize that even 'le based Makhno and CNT' also employed censorship right? Fucking Western libertarians like you are the worst. >he problem with Nazis isn't that they talk about their ideas The Nazis did not and could not have gotten into power by force. They did use it, but before that they were spreading their ideology like hotcakes and spread it even more after power was grabbed, that's how ideology works, dolt. >freedom to express your thoughts out in the open without reprisal from government <straightforward and well defined To a simpleton the "big scawwy gubmint" sure is a threat... to keeping your from being exposed to toxic elements. It has been pointed out many times in the thread with sources that people are influenced by their surroundings and media consumed. This is one of the principle parts of Das Kapital you fucktard. SO if you're exposed to toxic consumerism and ideology, you embrace it or are at the very least affected by it. >muh seekrit kids club Ok strawman <never get any traction Yeah, so little that ML parties are the dominant forms of communism in the past and today. Burgerstan is not the world. >I guess you don't like the gays either <Hurr I included this to bait you!!! Ok idiot 1) I don't care about gays, as long as they behave like any normal person. Being a flamboyant faggot is retarded stereotyping. 2) Gays are a minority, DEAL WITH IT >sexuality is a function of society Our entire society and its dialectical progress over time has been influenced by sex among many things, so yes you faggot, it is a function of society. Take a Sex Ed course, MFW. >Censorship in no way helps you achieve communism <ur just uthoritarian Ok brainlet, Marx and Lenin and history say otherwise >You just find it icky and want to use state power for your own ends. This is a personal problem Keep strawmanning, still no argument >There is definitely artistic value in pornography Already debunked, dismissed >muh disgust Ethics =/= morals >Normalization is also bullshit <not correlated with sexual assault <ignores the entire thread of posts on the topic <ignores the blatant effect of sexual commodification on society in the West You're stuck in an echochamber, and are a demonstration of what Marx stated about people being only able to change their lives only so much based on the socioeconomics of the environment >You don't get to decide what is or isn't quality Cry harder baby, It's not just me, it's a good 9/10 people. >artist determines themselves As any idiot knows (though not you apparently) artists can only "interpret" so much. If an artist says shit on a canvas is art... they're mentally ill, and we should not be enabling this. >manga artists are one-man operations Nonsequitur >muh arbiter Stop using words you don't understand on a subject you don't know and in a context you have no fathoming of. >contradictions None that I see. False equivalencies do not hypocrisy make. >Ben Shapiro Rap <ignores how most modern rap is just hip-hop garbage that turned the satire of rap into a commodity <ignores how the CIA funded this Read Adorno, liberal, Shapiro may be a Zionist hack but him bandwagoning on such a statement does not make it wrong. >Get over yourself No you >understand that your moral proclivities <Using more big words you don't understand Scroll up and stop wasting time >get on just fine with artistic expression under socialism Suuuuure bud, except theory AND real life demonstrate the opposite. >We don't need you to police how we do things This hilarious "we vs you" is hilarious considering the only "we" is a tiny percentage of the world population made up of Hikkikimori, Otaku, Weebs, pedos and lolberts like you... What a laugh.
>>3434 >read this American liberal "free-love" Otaku faggot who spouts the same stale platitudes about it being Ok to like perverting kids early >Literal author of a Otaku Manifesto, promoting the hedonism that actual Otaku like Miyazaki hated because of how disgusting these people end up being in their isolation <The sheer irony that this fucker actually finds all the evidence for this shit being real, including how market sexualization has lead to pressure on younger people to be 'sexual', but then dismisses it in the conclusion using cherry-picked sources <Also ignores how different cultures result in different expressions of damage (posted in thread) <Ignores how child abuse and pedophilia is hard to track down and is heavily under-reported compared to most other crimes, partially due to few people being bold enough to admit it and the fact that CSA victims are usually unable to comprehend their trauma until later, (posted in the thread) This level of argumentation has been posted and responded to IN THIS THREAD, simply with less of a long-winded bullshit-essay manner. Stochastic terrorism and the effects of media (POSTED IN THE THREAD) demonstrate that MEDIA INFLUENCES PEOPLE and SOCIETY, so fuck off.
>porn is art No. Outside of what other anons have said, Porn is MEDIA, and so is art, but that does not make Porn = Art, just as a triangle does not = a square even though both are 2 dimensional shapes with sides. corners, edges and angles.
>>3436 On the topic of stochastic terrorism - violence is so normalized that beyond superficial shock and outrage from terrorism, no-one actually cares until it affects them personally. Even those people who know its awful get desensitized to it, because otherwise stressing over every person killed by some psychopath will leave you a miserable wreck, because the world is a horrible place that requires stoicism and pragmatism, especially under the crushing pyramid of capitalism. It's proven that feelings and emotions can be exhausted, which means that, a character like the Incredible Hulk will reach a limit to their anger and just stop caring at some point, or more importantly a person's reaction to blood and horror is reduced to a sociopathic 'meh'.
>>3435 >Lenin and the Prostitutes Yeah, Lenin was wrong. He might have even been a racist. That doesn't make it concrete theory. Socialism is a scientific discipline. You can't just point at your prophet and call that a day. Make a formal argument or get out. >it's a feeling >hurr durr semantics. Let's look at the definition: <emotion: <a natural instinctive state of mind deriving from one's circumstances, mood, or relationships with others. Is lust for a nude character a natural instinctive state of mind deriving from the circumstances? Yes, very much so. Even if it wasn't it does involve emotions that give rise to it. So any pornographic depiction is art, even by your retarded definition. Deal with it. >Yep, you're a dumbass "freedumz" liberal Yeah, so weird that people want to be free. Must be why all the dictatorships you love had always had people fleeing them, or people within them rebelling. I guess those people were just capitalists in disguise. > It has been pointed out many times in the thread with sources that people are influenced by their surroundings and media consumed. No, that claim has been made, but the statistics of the real world don't bear that out. This is something you and the fundamentalist Christian right would really like to be true, but it's not. Kill yourself. Hope that sentence doesn't normalize you killing yourself. It'd be just awful if you were really that stupid. Then again... >Yeah, so little that ML parties are the dominant forms of communism in the past and today. Burgerstan is not the world. Those countries suck and the biggest one runs concentration camps as well as attempts to control every facet of life. No thanks, and they will probably fail. And no, one strongman controlling the country doesn't mean it's a dictatorship of the proletariat. It's just a dictatorship. >If an artist says shit on a canvas is art... they're mentally ill, and we should not be enabling this. Then don't look at it, retard. Nobody is forcing you to consume their art. Some, though will see the value in it. By the way, revulsion is also an emotion, so that's art. >Stop using words you don't understand on a subject you don't know and in a context you have no fathoming of. Pretty much the entire art world agrees with me, and not you. You are the one that thinks their art should be censored, and I bet you don't produce any yourself, and if you did, aren't submitting it for review to your local organization. You're just a retard with love for dictators. You're never going to make headway in America, and for all the complaints you make about my western viewpoints, you're just an edgy college kid with no accomplishments and no real idea of what you're talking about either. So no, don't try to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. >Read Adorno, liberal, Shapiro may be a Zionist hack but him bandwagoning on such a statement does not make it wrong. Ah, he said it. So you really think music has a technical formal definition. Jesus Christ, you're retarded. Make sure your girl doesn't have a WAP. Can't be having that kind of decadence, can we? > Suuuuure bud, except theory AND real life demonstrate the opposite. They don't, but you'll keep saying it because you're stuck in the past and don't know anything about social movements, revolution, or the state of the modern world. Protip: if you want to know about how revolutions form look at the military and their research. They know more about it than people from 100years ago. >This hilarious "we vs you" is hilarious considering the only "we" is a tiny percentage of the world population made up of Hikkikimori, Otaku, Weebs, pedos and lolberts like you... What a laugh. Yeah, and pretty much every American and anyone outside who is given the chance to express themselves. Nobody thinks it's wrong to express themselves as seen by the workarounds of censorship on Chinese internet. Nobody likes that shit and they'd get rid of it if they could. You're never gonna make it, kid. Seethe all you want and console yourself that China and the Norks exist. Your authoritarian ideology is never going to take off in the American or European left.
>>3437 This is a vacuous definition. Media is just the means by which information is transmitted. Art can be almost anything designed for the aesthetic purpose. Porn is art.
(20.74 KB 570x409 Marx yes.jpg)
>>3421 Vaush hasn't brought any useful socialists over. They are all socdem petty bourgeois kids with no real elegance to the movement. It is the work of real leftists to exorcise them of their lib socdemmery to turn them into actual communists. >>3420 The other guy completely demolished these non arguments. I don't need to do anything here. >lolicon artists don't jack it to their art I don't listen to my own music. Do they jack it to lolicon AT ALL? That is the question (the answer is of course yes). >>3422 Gay sex, zoophilia, straight sex, hand holding harm no one. There is no subjugation of the human in any of these. It doesn't matter whether this occurs in fiction or not, it happens in the mind of the consumer. Now whether or not this leads to a certain set of actions is another debate, the goal definitely is the complete abolition of the rape/pedo depiction and consumption. I'm not going to say censorship is the one step solution, same thing with nazis, but part of a greater plan, with education, while the wounds of capitalist society heal. What we have in Japan where such behavior can be normalized to the extent of child maid cafes cannot be taken as freedom of expression or a consenting relationship. We don't support sex workers because sex work is good, we support them because we want to destroy their position in society. This means disposing of, and expecting discipline from those who pimp and those who buy. Otherwise there is no expectation of how we can treat our fellow comrades. And please for the love of god stop crying about tankies, and NEVER use the word authoritarian, for your own good. It only outs you as a theory-let fool to other leftists. >>3431 >muh stalin >extremely vulgar reddit spacing Read Lenin, read Engels, and while you're at it read some Marx. Vaush videos are not a substitute for education. >The freedom to express your thoughts out in the open without reprisal from government. NOOO DON'T TAKE AWAY MY FLAT EARTH YOUTUBE VIDEOS THEY ARE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND CONDUCIVE TO A FUNCTIONING SOCIETY NOOOO >Censorship doesn't help communism Oh and I suppose 'violence' doesn't help communism either? >You find child porn icky Pic rel
>>3436 Yeah it was an interesting read history wise but the conclusions were fucking retarded. The most thought provoking thing was him talking about how the viewer associates themselves with the loli instead of the rapist. I can sympathize with this feeling in other porn, but I'm not sure it holds up. If they associate with the loli they need mental help, and the normalization of the imagery helps no one (source: Japan). >>3439 Debating what is and isn't art is kinda cringe. You have different definitions, no one can win this. However we can see the consequence of 'art' or 'porn' existing. To say that something is 'muh art' is a nothing argument and should just be ignored. Let's assume it is art, it does nothing for your argument. >He stops the reddit spacing Lul >Unashamed Chinese propaganda How did you find this place? The issue on Chinas position is very complicated and another debate altogether, but you shouldn't just spout propaganda like that. >Kill yourself A single instance of 'kill yourself' does as much harm as a single loli picture. The issue is the quantity and culture behind the loli pictures. This has consequences throughout society (see japan where such art is normalised). >Conflating the modern day communist view with disgusting conservatism It is more nuanced than that. People can be against pedos for different reasons, you know. >Everyone given a chance to express themselves will side with me Okay, you're retarded. I don't give a fuck if it is self expression or not, I'm not a little baby that cries when people talk about taking 'muh freedums1!!!', the self expression which harms others should not be allowed. I should not be allowed to express hatred for blacks in any shape or form. It must be crushed where it is found.
>>3441 >Gay sex, zoophilia, straight sex, hand holding harm no one Neither does a drawing. And I think your inability to get this through your head is what's wrong here. Anyway, I'll continue this tomorrow. I have to be up in an hour to teach some young people how to not be failures like you.
>>3443 In the depictions no one is harmed. Depictions, or art as you call it, have wide reaching societal effects. Do you deny this basic fact?
>>3440 >Art can be almost anything designed for the aesthetic purpose. <Porn (which is not for esthetic purpose) is not art. FTFY >>3439 >Lenin was wrong History says otherwise >He might have even been a racist LOL what a liberal nonsequitur. Considering Lenin was a mutt with German, Jewish, Swedish, Russian, Chuvash and Kalmyk blood in his veins. He was ant-nationalist and never had racial based rhetoric, that would Trotsky. >doesn't make it concrete theory But his books are >scientific discipline Political science isn't a real science >point at your prophet LOL imagine being you, an idiot who decided to claim that loli is totally ok under socialism. Then, when pointed out that, no Marx, Lenin, Engels and other communists did not have moralisms about "muh freedumz of expression" and "muh porn is art" and instead actively worked against such capitalist decadence, you switch to claiming that we're using argument by authority, which is just bullshit. >hurr durr semantic <hurr let me nitpick and ignore the definitive differences Still no argument, also nice to see you ommit <instinctive or intuitive feeling as distinguished from reasoning or knowledge >weird that people want to be free <I'm a hedonistic libertine so that means EVERYONE else is like me. >Muh dictatorship love Cry harder >always had people fleeing them And here is the glowfaggotry coming to the surface. One of Cuba’s Caribbean neighbors is the Dominican Republic. 41,000 Dominicans immigrated to the US in 2012 (not including the tens of thousands more that came undocumented). Under 10,000 total came from Cuba that year, a fraction of the Dominicans that immigrated. The Dominican Republic produces far more immigrants than Cuba, and yet has a smaller population by 2 million, and requires a longer and more dangerous journey to the US for immigrants. Indeed, millions of people from all over the world immigrate to the US, including 11.7 million Mexicans. Millions more have come from all other Latin American countries. What’s clear is that there is not a mass exodus of refugees from Cuba. Cuban emigres are given the spotlight by the US government and media because it can be conveniently used to as ammo to demonize a country that is not compliant with imperialism. The simple fact is that any time there is a developed country nearby a less developed country, there is a tendency for the latter to produce immigration towards the former. And people fled to the USSR often as well, so cry harder >rebelling <Ignores how majority of all rebellions under 'le commie dictatorship' were CIA funded interventions Ok glowfag >those people were just capitalists in disguise Like I pointed out, people are easy to manipulate, history proves this. >the statistics of the real world <TL;DR: I didn't read what was posted because feels>reals whatever, stay in denial >you and the fundamentalist Christian right <muh conservatives!!!!! muh right-wing Just because your boogieman says similar things does not make it the same. >Kill yourself. <Hope that sentence doesn't normalize you killing yourself. Ironically given that cyberbullying is considered a serious problem and that such messages HAVE in fact been shown to drive people to do so, and people don't think about the consequences of saying this. Just an FYI but "KYS" can be a criminal offense. https://www.stompoutbullying.org/blog/tell-someone-kill-themselves-and-you-could-end-jail >awful if you were really that stupid <People's minds are complex and subject to the environment affecting them at different rates <Hurr ur stoopid because a message didn't work instantly You're unironically demented, seek help you sociopath. >Those countries suck <Former Soviet population is 50-80% in thinking the USSR was better to live in <Soviet Economoy and HDI was higher than the former Soviet countries today Hello again CIA liberal, done lying yet? Nobody says they're Utopias, nobody says they're FULLCOMMUNISM either. >ne runs concentration camp LOL where? The GULAGs? Nope, not a concentration camp unless you take the most liberal description, in which case every single prison in every single country is a concentration camp. China? Nope, Uighurs aren't in a camp https://img.booru.org/lefty//images/12/5ca2b50d46e3e3eee22b7b51f5d5b07d0450e3e0.jpg The DPRK? Outside of their own GULAGs, no they don't have this. Cuba? Nope. Also aren't you bitching about moral-fagging being on an individual? HMMM I smell hypocrisy. >hey will probably fail <an undefined statement again Fail in what regard? Collapse? China is still going, revisionism or not, the DPRK is going strong despite heavy embargo and isolation as well as a lack of arable land. Cuba is a fucking Paradise compared to most of South America and the USSR lasted several generations. If collapse is supposed to be a metric for failure, then that's retarded because capitalist countries have collapsed repeatedly over history. What about achievements? Cuba, China and the USSR are all in possession of many achievements in HDI, technology and other areas. >one strongman controlling the country <Muh Great Man theory!!!! Unironic liberalism is brian rot >Then don't look at it This is the capitalist argument of "if you don't like it, don't buy it" so fuck off. For one thing respecting pubic boundaries is part of society, you cannot ever be really free in a society. >will see the value in it <revulsion is an emotion Unless that was the intent and was the intent with more than provoking disgust it isn't. You didn't read the full argument I posted and therefore stumble on the same spades. An example of such a thing actually BEING art is Fountain by Marcel Duchamp. The point was a message about how art was becoming any random shit people did. Instead people took this seriously and the CIA helped. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html >the entire art world agrees with me Given that I know actual artists and have been going to Museums and studying art since I was a child, you're wrong. I'm quite certain most if not all artists of the past would probably clobber you for thinking loli hentai is 'art' >thinks their art should be censored Way to oversimplify things bub >you don't produce any yourself <Yeah I bet you don't buy those Rembrants fag! Ok idiot. FYI I have paintings in my house and have an entire bookshelf dedicated to art books from Japan to the Renaissance and more >submitting it for review to your local organization <Capitalism is the same as socialism!!! What a fucking strawman. FYI Carnegie Hall can literally have any idiot play their shit as long as they pay the rent. Art shows feature an shit regularly and there is no local organization. Not to mention, being a professional artist is something most people don't do. >You're just a genius who understands socio-economics and their influence on culture FTFY >never going to make headway in America <le idpozzed burgerstan supports hedonism so that means you're wrong and can't get support Hilarious. Given that Adorno and many others after him have been lamenting the same thing and actively fighting it, wrong. >an edgy college kid with no accomplishments <I have no real arguments except screamining "freedum" and "muh dictator" so I'll just attack the person instead Ad hominum is not an argument and neither is this undefined idea of accomplishments. People 60 years old or more don't have any "accomplishments" to their name. By your metric, because they didn't slather grime on a rock and call it art. Yet they have accomplished things. Found and did work, had families/relationships, drawn or written things for themselves etc. And I've done that, so you're wrong again. >no real idea of what you're talking about <N-no u!!!! COPE
>>3453 >>3439 >music has a technical formal definition 1) Agreeing with Adorno's general ideas does not mean I necessarily agree with everything he says 2) A Technical Formal Definition is necessary because music, like art is not defined. http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/DATABASES/SWA/On_popular_music_1.shtml >ur retarded <girlfriend dcadence idiocy No argument >you'll keep saying it because you're stuck in the past <they don't <it's just the past!!!! make up your mind >don't know anything about social movements, revolution, or the state of the modern world Given that I've been part of social movements and know the history of revolutions well, you're wrong. Unless you've lived through a revolution you have 0 high-ground and even then, living through something is not a guarantees of intelligence, even fools grow old today. >State of the modern world I'm more aware than you for sure >look at the military and their research <Protip <tells me basic fucking information that has been known since the 60s LO fucking L >every American <brainwashed consumers who can't think beyond binary Democrat/Republican splits represent the world OK >anyone outside who is given the chance to express themselves LOL no. You have no idea how hard it is to be a genuine artist in "muh free expression capitalism" that exists near everywhere. In the words of George Lucas, You have to adhere to a very narrow line of commercialism to be successful and be able to keep living. >Nobody thinks it's wrong to express themselves Stop equating general expression of an individual to literal hentai porn, when the latter is such a tiny and toxic part of self-expression that it's pathetic. >Nobody likes that shit and they'd get rid of it if they could Because capitalism idiot. You keep talking about China like a revisionist state is somehow a good example >never gonna make it, kid <I'm totally older than you, even though most users of this chan are less than 30 years old Whatever >Seethe and console China and the Norks The only seething here is yours, ya generalizing sockpuppet >authoritarian ideology is never going to take off in the American or European left. European liberals are barely centrists on the Overton Window, but ok fag. >>3443 >I have to be up in an hour to teach some young people how to not be failures like you. <One out of every 20 young college graduates is unemployed <Current education system is failing heavily Sure, keep ruining others lives with your supposed brainless teachings.
>>3443 >I have to be up in an hour to teach some young people <MFW when such an immature faggot is teaching others Given that almost any rando can be a teacher these days, it's not surprising, but the future of America is quite bleak.
Paul Cockshott has entered the discussion.
>>3467 >>3471 >Bumping this shit thread why
>>3474 Seeing so many walls of text over something so harmless is fun.
>>3850 You're unironically retarded
Raiders have been crapfloodin lolibait too.
(113.42 KB 800x650 loli types.jpg)
"Loli" is sexual. We don't call, for example, Yugi Muto a "shota". OFC liking a young female character doesn't in and of itself make you a pedophile. But there's a difference, for instance, between calling Akko a "young girl" and a "loli". One of these things is derived from a form of child pornography, itself etymologically traced back to a book about a pedophile. Sexual attraction is a nonnegotiable component of pedophilia; it's the defining component. But to claim that someone who likes typical loli aesthetics in a non-sexual manner and context is a pedophile makes about as much sense as claiming that everyone who thinks babies are cute is also a pedophile. Without sexuality, there is absolutely no argument to be made for most paraphilia. It's as contradictory as cancer without abnormal cell growth; that's just not how it works. Pedophilia: " sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object." http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia Lolicon: "Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon Lolicon contributes to the continuation of pedo activities in Japanese culture. Most anime fans would argue that just because you see something on TV, video games, movies etc doesn't directly cause a person to emulate said activity. The popular analogy is GTA. Just because someone plays GTA, that wouldn't make them more likely to run out and start stealing cars and murdering hookers. But that comparison doesn't apply 100%. If a person was getting sexual gratification from killing hookers in GTA, then they are off to begin with. This is giving the benefit of the doubt about the studies on violence in video-games/movies affecting people. Loli genre helps to keep the pedo culture alive in Japan. Is there any reason for Shiro, in NGNL, to be an 11 year old girl that gets naked constantly? Now anime fans would argue that is just harmless fan service… Something that has been ingrained in anime culture since the beginning. However, couldn't one assume that if you found something like the Loli attractive, you'd be more likely to find yourself looking for that same sort of attractiveness in real life. Lolicon is often just used as an alternative, harmless to others? Maybe though that is an arguable point, but regardless that isn't solving the problem but giving a 'legal' remedy to suppress symptoms. Pedophilia is a mental disorder, and it can cause harm, not only to the children, but to the person who suffers from it as well (which is why people shouldn't draw comparisons to sexual orientation, which is a different matter). Paedophiles usually have low self-esteem, poor social skills, and much higher propensity to develop cognitive distortions and Antisocial Personality Disorder. One can argue that lolicon pics may be useful in the sense that it satisfies urges of paedophiles without actual children coming to harm, but this won't work for everyone. Paedophilia can & must be treated in order to prevent the patient from harming children and further deteriorating their mental health. We can't consider lolicon a serious way to help/prevent paedophilia because it only reinforces the notion that their condition is normal, just as we wouldn't validate a paranoid schizophrenic's delusions. Pedophilia, as all mental disorders, makes a mess of your life, left untreated (in this case we're talking about ASPD-like traits such as lack of concern for others and inability to form relationships with people, not to mention difficulty/inability to have a satisfying sex life). >inb4 pedophilia/lolicon can't/don't need to be treated https://web.archive.org/web/20170830022021/http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No72/No72_12VE_Marshall.pdf There's another publication titled "Cognitive Behavioural Treatment of Sexual Offenders" that is more in-depth but I can't find it. Paedophilia is a paraphilia (a fetish) and is classified as a mental disorder on the grounds that it causes harm to the psyche of the affected person who, by extension becomes dangerous to others. Being a 'lolicon' or consuming that content to cope, reinforces the notion that their condition is normal and they continue to ignore the fact that they suffer from a mental disorder and that they must seek help. This is like telling a paranoid schizophrenic that their delusions are true, it only adds to the problem instead of helping, even if the short-term results seem fine. >https://prospect.org/article/should-rape-porn-be-banned >https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/05/27/pornography-is-more-than-just-sexual-fantasy-its-cultural-violence/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ecea036794ee >https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2015/mar/06/virtual-reality-paedophilia-not-harmless-victimless Moreover in Japan they have places where men can hire petite girls barely of age to play in fantasies that are essentially every other loli-hentai about fucking under-age schoolgirls. Such fantasies are mentally unhealthy, this is the same shit that made 50 Shades of Grey so popular despite it being pure sewage. >https://elkballet.wordpress.com/2010/09/29/rape-porn-is-never-ok/ A lolita complex is a term used in Japanese culture for paedophilia, is applied similarly. Just like in English though, it has a very specific definition but is often used in place of other more appropriate, but less commonly known words. Example: legally, paedophilia is an attraction to people who are considered minors. In most US states, this means under the age of 18. It's worth noting that this still applies even if the age of consent is below 18. However, psychologically/scientifically, paedophilia refers to a specific subset of people with a paraphilia for minors. The psychological community categorizes people who are attracted to children in the age range of 5-10 years to be paedophiles. For 0-4 years the term used is nepophile, for 11-14 years it's hebophile, and for 15-19 it's ephebophile. The Japanese community has similarly specific terminology, but like in English law those all fall under the umbrella of pedophilia, in Japan lolicon is typically used as a catch-all term, with the rest being viewed as unnecessarily pedantic outside of a clinical or academic setting. However, lumping all pedophiles under one label is highly detrimental in a variety of ways. For example, it's estimated that around 1 in 5 people have some form of paedophilia, but most of them have ephebophilia, which is considered to not necessarily be a mental disorder in and of itself, but rather a natural consequence of humans reaching sexual maturity in their mid to late teens. This oversimplification, coupled with how we handle pedophilia in the legal community, has negatively impacted research into the subject. Because pedophilia is a crime in and of itself, as well as a mental disorder, unoffending paedophiles are understandably reluctant to come forward. Even speaking up while in session with a therapist can be a big risk because while doctor-patient confidentiality applies, the doctor is required to disclose information to authorities if they feel the patient is an immediate threat to themselves or others. Which they may believe due to stigma, even if it isn't true in the case of their patient. In some jurisdictions, a person diagnosed with paedophilia can actually be required to register as a sex offender, even if they haven't actually committed any crime. Naturally, non-offending pedophiles are hard to find as a result, which means that the only ones we get to study are the ones who a) offended and b) got caught, which obviously skews our data pretty severely. As far as we know, all of our studies up to this point have been done on statistical outliers. Consequently, we know next to nothing about paedophilia and its associated disorders. We don't know what causes it, if it's genetic, environmental, or some combination. We don't know if it's entirely psychological or if there are differences in the physical structure of a paedophile's brain. We don't know what other disorders might coincide with it outside of those already covered.
(363.10 KB 406x496 FBI loli.png)
Some more details in regards to drawn CP laws in the USA. Such laws are fairly universal in most first world countries. >The PROTECT Act also enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is "obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in … sexual intercourse … and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". By its own terms, the law does not make all simulated child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the internet, or transported across state lines >Dwight Whorley was convicted in Richmond, Virginia under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males". On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years imprisonment. Whorley appealed to the Supreme Court, but this was denied. >In October 2012, after being reported by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography", with the U.S. attorney's office for the Western District of Missouri recommending a 3-year prison sentence without parole. The office in conjunction with the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force argued that the "Incest Comics" on Bee's computer "clearly lack any literary, artistic, political or scientific value". Christian Bee was originally indicted for possession of actual child pornography, but that charge was dropped as part of a plea deal, and was instead charged with possession of the "Incest Comics". international minor porn laws >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors >https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2257&context=gjicl
>mods lock thread after the drama has already died That was useless
>>2869 >If you sexualize said stylistically cute characters, or use images of characters resembling children as pornography, you are a pedo, and you should get your head bricked in. </thread>
>>2909 >Hyper Text Transfer Protocol is liberalism Use GOPHER then.
>>2919 ipv4 addresses are limited. Now if we were using ipv6 your argument could hold some ground.
Thoughts on the Cuties debacle.
Miyazaki apparenlty claimed to be a lolicon. It might not be true, however.
(2.62 MB 1996x1294 z18.png)
>>3922 The idea of a movie talking about the over sexualization of children is not bad, however I think that in the case of Cuties they just wanted to do softcore CP and normalize it, while pretending to preach against it... they even have "le oppressive parents" meme in it. The official Synopsis wasas follows, “Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family’s traditions.” 1) That's straight up contrarian "fugg uthority" bullshit 2) It's an excuse to film underage girls 3) Twerking is not dancing in the sense of a public-appropriate display, it's the kind of sexual dance a girls may do to arouse someone of interest to them. https://archive.vn/CBeyk
>>3924 Les Mignonnes was not produced by Nexflix, it's a French "film d'auteur" (you would call it indie movie in the US I guess) from Maimouna Doucouré, "le oppressive parents" is not really a meme and is based on her experiences as a kid. If you think this is sofcore CP the you would have to call Pasolini's Salò o le centoventi giornate di Sodoma a scat movie and and Gaspard Noé's Irréversible a rape snuff movie.
After a decade of vigorous masturbation exclusively on hentai my penis is unable to react to real female humanoids. This cientificaly prooves that japanese cartoons make males infertal due to conditioned dick limpness.
>>3924 >its da joos great, we've reached the end of rational discussion
(52.91 KB 1024x764 decline in sex.jpg)
(204.90 KB 952x1344 cumbrain.jpg)
(74.29 KB 242x1024 sperm counts.jpg)
>>3925 I know what Les Mignones is I watch French kino all the time. Netflix did not just host the film, but also took part in its creation. >indie movie No, an indie movie would be something like that movie about 3 sisters who marry different minorities and this causes internal strife with their conservative parents in comedic ways, as well as strife between the future sons-in-law. (Can't rememebr the name right now) >call the following X those two examples are not good examples. Those films are fucking abysmal, just barely about Груз 200 in terms of how pretentiously shite they are. >not really a meme <Parents disapprove of girls `sexualizing themselves like harlots is oppression of expression of kids This is an ancient cliche of "le child defies parents to be free" that is beyond tiresome. >based on her experiences as a kid Ah, the "based on real events" meme used to justify everything from Chernobyl to Enemy at the Gates and all sorts of other garbage. >>>3927 Where the fuck do you see "da joos" you idiot? Le happy merchant is used for representing a lot of caricatures from Kulaks to stormniggers to jews to liberals. >>3926 Pics related LOL
>>3924 >>3931 cringe
>>3932 pedo
Some very based dudes destroying the loli pesos here. However I'm unsure of the comparison of Cuties to Irriversible. The rape in that is fiction, no rape had to occur for the film to be produced. However softcore cheese pizza had to be created for cuties regardless of it's content. Not saying a film couldn't be made to tackle the same issues, but having seen some footage, it is clearly more than what is required.
(80.46 KB 766x727 Screenshot_20201007_024906.png)
>>3931 Netflix had nothing to do with the creation of the movie nor its production. The movie was produced by "Bien ou Bien Productions" and "France 3 Cinéma" (which is the movie branch of the French national public network). In France for a movie to receive subventions for the State, it must be a 100% French production, if Netflix had any part in that the movie wouldn't have received any money from the French State. Of course this doesn't agree with your Qanon tier narrative that (((They))) created the movie in order to destroy western civilization and its values.
>>3939 >>3942 >Netflix had nothing to do with the creation of the movie nor its production <Marketing isn't part of creation or production LOL ok >France 3 Cinéma I know what that is m8. >it must be a 100% French production to receive money 1) lobbying 2) You do understand that hollywood and it's castrated children like Netflix influence the world right? 3) Netflix has international branches. By your logic they can't be financed because Netflix advertised and paid for the promotion of the film >Qanon tier Ever since it's been revealed that "conspiracy theory" was spread as a CIA buzzword, y'all have been using "muh Q" as an excuse to try and belittle your opponent Have you SEEN the Epstein and Occult HItlerite threads? Has everyone forgotten Harvey Weinstein? Paedophilia is widespread in the West. >destroy western civilization and its values Nice projection there buddy, but I never said any of that. But since you're so kind to mention it, shall I point out that the CIA has repeatedly funded liberals like Gloria Steinhem Henri Marcuse and many others to promote idpol views? And that it was done to "corrupt" American youth and clearly works (as seen with Ghettofication, racial division and liberalization of the West under idpol) https://archive.is/luwAu https://archive.is/jtQEt With all these pedo-rings, sexual-exploitation in the movie industry and obvious history of CIA meddling, is it that far a stretch to claim that it is normalizing CP? Especially when in the past decade revolting rubbish names like "Minor Attracted People" have been created to Euphamize and soften the real implication PEDOPHILIA.
>>3943 Ah I didn't mean to reply to >>3939. (also checked)
>>2865 No retard loli doesn't mean pedofile but the people who draw porn of them are
>>2877 Cope pedo
>>3931 Reminder that the Red Guards were all volcels.
>>3953 This is a good article on the problem.
This glorious thread should remain at the top. It has the questions which all persons of culture philosophize about.
>>3969 Just fucking stop
read Naitō Chizuko, actually Rafiq's posts are correct.
>>3984 >Not saging You're not wrong but please keep that in mind
>>3984 Can you give me some pdfs or something? Searching for Naitō Chizuko doesn't offer much help
>>2865 Isn't the lolis promote pedophilia argument the same as the idea that violent video games promotes violence? Mainstream porn has rape and incest play in it but you don't see an increase in those.
>>4001 1) learn to fucking scroll this thread 2) Yes in fact it is the same idea and ther eis in fact a basis to the violent video-games promote violent behaviour thesis list of sources >>3046 >porn has rape and incest play 1) unlike loli sexualization and videogames, porn is not as mainstream or easily accessible. 2) rape porn does in fact promote normalization of the concept, however it is in such little amount and so niche a fetish that is impact as a medium is minimal. 3) Incest.... *cough* Alabama *cough* Middle-East arranged cousin marriages *cough* Now stop bumping this fucking topic
>>4002 >learn to fucking scroll this thread This thread is long and holy shit what the fuck is going on here? Sorry for bumping this thread, gonna use sage.
>>4004 good. Also nice /GET/s I wonder who got >>4000
>>3444 No evidence of this. The crime statistics do note reflect such a trend and nobody has ever established such a relation outside of very specific studies which cannot be extrapolated to the wider population. Otherwise, you'd expect me to be a very violent individual with all the gore I consume. >>3455 Top kek. I'm not a teacher. I'll leave it up to your imagination.
and i wonder why we can't start a revolution lmao
>>4017 >No evidence of this <ignores all the links and posts indicating otherwise >crime statistics do note reflect such a trend You sound like a liberal whining about "le wage gap" and conveniently ignoring context and everything else >you'd expect me to be a very violent individual with all the gore I consume I do >nobody has ever established such a relation Wrong > very specific studies which cannot be extrapolated to the wider population Because there are multiple variables you dullard. Things like psychology of different ages, the expectation of whether one is held responsible for consequences etc. You're just nitpicking and ignoring the obvious. >not a teacher So a professor or some other shit, doesn't matter. Point stands; American education is horrible and you're just another example of why.
>>4017 >No evidence of this <Hurr media doesn't influence people <desensitization and normalization is totally not real dude, trust me! Kek
>>4021 It's not, you're really just retarded.
What's the topic in this thread anyways?
>>4037 Sure bud, keep coping. >>4043 loli and politics obviously
Today was Loli Day apparently.
>>4066 This is the loli that means the art, presumably.
>>2865 Because cheese pizza had corrupted the USSR.
(613.55 KB 1024x578 abyss-3-1024x578.png)
>>2865 Shotas are better
>>2909 Based.
>>4087 This is the basic premise of Surveillance Valley.
>>4084 Shotas are more dialectical.
>>4092 Wahh wahh
>>2865 This should be a thread about the history of loli.
>>4313 >making a history of something that inane no >>4314 Already posted in the Miyazaki thread
>>2865 Once you are old enough you develop parental feelings towards little girls and boys, even if they are not your own. Now imagine there are some people who claim that the same signals they receive triggers a sexual response in them instead.
Poor oppressed pedophiles.
(1.50 MB 1440x1080 1446228640605.png)
>>4043 The same kind of ironic weebs that post memes about not lewding Kanna/Megumin/other meme loli and normalfags getting really, really mad at drawings. >>4313 https://forums.e-hentai.org/index.php?act=ST&f=13&t=221062&st=0#entry5272948 Here's a thread about the very first loli doujin circle. Also, check out Disappearance Diary by Hideo Azuma, it's an autobiography by the guy who is considered the father of lolicon, I haven't read it but it will probably have info on the eighties lolicon boom. I don't know much about the nineties, other that CCS was absurdly influential
>>4553 >ironic weebs I don't think they're ironic if they defend lewding so much. None of the 'normies' are against lolis in anime, they're against making it sexual past the point of "haha you're a pervert" A la Monogatari. >forums Nice post. Good to know nobody here will have to waste time compiling loli-porn studies to detail some history of it. On an unrelated note, Sankaku has gone full retard and shut-off access to half their images, and in a very weird fashion because there's not a REAL reason why some images are included and others are not.
Communism won't have loli hentai in it.
>>4558 Sankaku complex made it so that you have to pay to actually browse more than the most recent images in the search.
>>4754 Even recent images are falling under thsi PPV Luckily people are already making githubs to get around it.
Has Unruhe really come back to the imageboards?
General criticism of anime aside, this.
(936.54 KB 1600x1900 top boom.png)
Giving children the knowledge, environment, connections, and confidence to avoid and be wary of being taken advantage of is far more important than caring about whether or not lolicons are even a threat. If you're really concerned with the supposed ultimate consequence of allowing lolicons to indulge themselves, then you should agree since the issue is after all ultimately about protecting children. The supposed "normalization" of pedophilia will be counteracted by creating clear social norms that are opposed to it, and those mentally ill enough to desire to act will be unable to when we have prepared for it. Hating on lolicons, and pedophiles by extension, is just an extremely safe and self-reassuring way to say you don't like bad things. You can't be argued with because you've chosen such a safe position that assumed any other position on the topic is not as against bad things as you and therefor supports the bad things. This is SJW/Idpol tier trite discussion that is ultimately more about creating a boogeyman than giving a shit about child predators. Nobody likes bad things. We'd all like to prevent bad things. You're not special.
>>4877 >Giving children the knowledge, environment, connections, and confidence to avoid and be wary of being taken advantage of is far more important than caring about whether or not lolicons are even a threat This is such a fucking nonsequitur deflectionthat implies that you can only do one or the other. >you're really concerned with the supposed ultimate consequence of allowing lolicons to indulge themselves, then you should agree since the issue is after all ultimately about protecting children People cannot protect children if their social environment does not encourage it. This has been posted about already with at least half a dozen links giving examples of this. >The supposed "normalization" of pedophilia will be counteracted by creating clear social norms that are opposed to it On paper this is true, however the reality of it is clearly visible in the West today, wherein 'MAPs' are being listened to more and more. It's a slow and clever process by Porky to turn society into a mindles, all-consuming mess, a literal cyberpunk world where everything goes (to hell). >you've chosen such a safe position Given the number of people screaming about "muh moralfags" this is clearly not the case. The public status quo currently is only temporary. >SJW/Idpol tier trite discussion Given that most arguments against lolishit in the thread are NOT SJW idpol in any way, I disagree. >ultimately more about creating a boogeyman than giving a shit about child predator So you may claim, proofs you have not. >You're not special Who claimed we were?
>>4877 >safe position <H-hey dude, don't you know opposing /pol/ nazis is a safe position? Laughable
(422.49 KB 2149x3035 27f128e4aefa94480eff4909a26b0d3e.jpg)
>>4883 >This is such a fucking nonsequitur deflectionthat implies that you can only do one or the other. I'm not saying you can only do one or the other, but that you should not want to do the latter when the former exists. The latter is getting into territory that I find ridiculous on principle. If you consider lolicons pedophiles then be glad the majority have apparently convinced themselves that they don't have any attraction to real children. If it's true that they are actually pedophiles then it is either extremely effective at satisfying such urges or it outright replaces them. We should focus on the former as it actually directly addresses the core problem. Prevention and protection before persecution and speculation. >People cannot protect children if their social environment does not encourage it. This has been posted about already with at least half a dozen links giving examples of this. I think it's a little dramatic to assume that the social environment is anything but encouraging it. I don't know how much you hang around more "normalfag" circles but pedos are hated deeply and opportunities to shit on them are taken extremely enthusiastically. Responsible parents and mentor figures taught me to be wary and continue to do so to the coming generations. This is as it should be. >On paper this is true, however the reality of it is clearly visible in the West today, wherein 'MAPs' are being listened to more and more. "MAP"s are a meme and are at best told to seek help by sane people. I learned what a "MAP" was by seeing people shit on them. In an age of progressive views on sexual expression gaining more ground, I think it's only natural that both actual pedos and false flaggers will start to come out and try to mingle with the crowd. I don't think this signals a need to suppress such expression or even that any action needs to be taken to stop a perceived pedo normalization. If anything, we're seeing a good step forward in getting pedos to literally just out themselves. An open pedo is not a threat. A closet one is a threat. If you disapprove of them then let them come to you. Give them enough rope to hang their illness with. Like I said, they're going to be told to seek help at best. >It's a slow and clever process by Porky to turn society into a mindles, all-consuming mess, a literal cyberpunk world where everything goes (to hell). Going to just have to reassert that I do not see pedophilia being normalized. It's one of the topics that gets people of pretty much any mainstream leaning together in agreement. And on the fringe side, many conspiracy theories at least suggest it is a threat since that hatred is effective in generating interest. To you, porky obviously must be behind the pedos. My point is, people will gladly link their nemesis to it. It is evil. It is so universal that I honestly can not in good faith entertain the notion that lolicons, who are controversial even among themselves, will ever sway relevant and mainstream opinions on actual real world pedophilia even if we're to assume every one of them would like to. >Given the number of people screaming about "muh moralfags" this is clearly not the case. The public status quo currently is only temporary. I believe the moralfag claims are towards the strange puritanism that drives anti loli posters. The moral panic over cartoon pornography. The status quo is not going to swing in favor of normalizing pedophilia because edgy imageboard posters don't like moralfag takes on lolis. >Given that most arguments against lolishit in the thread are NOT SJW idpol in any way, I disagree. Not literally, but on the same level. The disregard for the obvious practical answer for the opportunity to tell someone to stop enjoying something on moral grounds. >So you may claim, proofs you have not. True. It's just my assumption. But this entire argument only exists because of assumptions. I don't like it and usually don't indulge it since there's little point when it just boils down to a difference in morals born from assumptions about what type of people coom to what animu girl. >Who claimed we were? Nobody but the implication is definitely there, in what anti loli posters say, that they're uniquely fighting an encroaching pedo menace. It's not bad that this isn't special though, I'm glad the norm is a fear of pedos so long as it is balanced just right so that pedos feel the urge to change rather than hide and fester. I don't dislike you for it, I dislike the sentiment that lolis are particularly dangerous. I tried to stay away from muh art or muh freedoms as much as possible, and just meet you on a level where I explain why I believe it's redundant to even care. >>4886 I'm sorry, I don't know how /pol/ is relevant. I hope I don't seem like /pol/, not a fan of their ilk.
>>4895 TL;DR: While I don't disagree with you completely (and you make reasonable points), the devil is in the details. But this has been argued ad nauseum ad prior to your megu-posts, the thread was sinking merrily down. >you should not want to do the latter when the former exists I disagree. Removing pedophilic imagery from all media is a socially important step as it firmly denies potential pedophile defenders an out with disengenous arguments. I don't think lolicons ought to get prosecuted, but it shouldn't be encouraged, and should be excluded from easy public access. > be glad the majority have apparently convinced themselves that they don't have any attraction to real children <it is either extremely effective at satisfying such urges or it outright replaces them Trust me, I am glad. I just have the empathy to think long-term and consider the fact that helping people is also a responsibility of a communist society for material and ethical reasons. Historically bans and incrimination have failed to help without supplements. Moreover I would say lolicon tends to be a gateway into pedoshit for some people. >pedos are hated deeply and opportunities to shit on them are taken extremely enthusiastically I agree, HOWEVER like with many other unsavory movements and ideas, pedos have been quietly trying to get normalized through euphamisms and bullshit research and normalization through liberal reform. >esponsible parents and mentor figures taught me to be wary and continue to do so to the coming generations Same, and I agree, however I have noticed a trend of this kind of wariness being less and less common, at least in the West. >"MAP"s are a meme and are at best told to seek help by sane people m8 I have been to PTA meetings and other such activities where such people are not only called in to schools to talk to children, but have lengthy, applauded TED talks and, of all things, followers. Steven Pinker is a pedo apologist and is quite influential. >an age of progressive views on sexual expression gaining more ground It's an inherent part of liberal idpol >I don't think this signals a need to suppress such expression or even that any action needs to be taken to stop a perceived pedo normalization In this I firmly disagree. They are the kind of people who will take a mile if you give them an inch. It's the same reason all sorts of alphabet soup idpol with 64 genders and sexualities plague Gay Rights movements. They are the same people who defend child beauty pageants and child drag queens and 'determination of gender' for kids who aren't even close to puberty, let alone able to be conscious of such concepts. >If you disapprove of them then let them come to you. Give them enough rope to hang their illness with. I wish it were that easy, but that's not PC anymore. Gulag jokes are only ironic these days. >It's one of the topics that gets people of pretty much any mainstream leaning together in agreement As I said, it's not normalized NOW, but it's slowly being pushed and prodded. Expose people to it, desensitize them and slowly bring it out more and more over decades. >porky obviously must be behind the pedos Is Epstein and the Westboro pedo ring and numerous evidence of them being involved in such heinous activities not evidence enough? It seems a disproportionate number of porkies are involved with pedoshit. Your trust in the human race's disgust with pedoshit and the controversy of lolicon is heartwarming, my own faith in humanity is much lower. The trends of societal development of he past century and a half demonstrate a very clear picture to me of just how proficient global capital is at obfuscating truths and playing the long-game. >The moral panic over cartoon pornography As I said, it's a good bit more than that >The disregard for the obvious practical answer for the opportunity to tell someone to stop enjoying something on moral grounds Because this is a mongolian throatsinging board, not a professional debate. Moreover while I think that logic and proofs are important, the idea that morals are 'bad' is a rather ironic one to have for a communist, given the fact that morals arise from the dialectical development of society, which in turn is part of human evolution, as has been discussed in the thread. >I don't like it and usually don't indulge it Then why post about it at all? >I explain why I believe it's redundant to even care. And you make a good argument. But my consideration for the topic and my personal dislike for loli hentai is based primarily on a more long-term considerations. Futile, I know, but the most I can do is try and at least get people to think and not just 'consoom coom product'.
>>4898 >But this has been argued ad nauseum ad prior to your megu-posts, the thread was sinking merrily down Alright, I'll be more brief. My apologies for autistic necro ranting but I'm glad I got to actually get someone to at least see the reason behind what I think. >m8 I have been to PTA meetings and other such activities where such people are not only called in to schools to talk to children, but have lengthy, applauded TED talks and, of all things, followers. I don't think a lolicon existing or not would change this, though maybe you see them as symptoms of the same problem. >In this I firmly disagree. They are the kind of people who will take a mile if you give them an inch. >my own faith in humanity is much lower I worry deeply for a human race so flawed. I don't want to believe it and hope certain lines should be easy to draw with common sense. >numerous evidence of them being involved in such heinous activities not evidence enough? Trust me I know there are fucked up people who take advantage of children, but again this comes down to the difference in worldviews where I see lolicon as not having any bearing on such things happening or not. >not a professional debate >Then why post about it at all? Sorry, but this sort of thing is difficult to have a discussion on in any other way for reasons that have been discussed. I guess I just felt like taking an opportunity to try. >As I said, it's a good bit more than that I'd like to believe lolicon is nothing more than what it is, ultimately. >the idea that morals are 'bad' I don't think morals are either good or bad. In this instance I think they're being used poorly even if I agree with the sentiment. >And you make a good argument. But my consideration for the topic and my personal dislike for loli hentai is based primarily on a more long-term considerations. Futile, I know, but the most I can do is try and at least get people to think and not just 'consoom coom product'. Understandable. In the grand scheme I don't think we're at risk of it being this sort of issue though but I respect that basically you've made up your mind on that. Maybe I'm naive. I hope I'm not and the human race does in fact have an inherent capacity for rejecting a change of this sort, otherwise I fear for what will become of us in any environment.
>>4909 >My apologies for autistic necro ranting but I'm glad I got to actually get someone to at least see the reason behind what I think. It's fine, you're far more civilized than average posters here. >maybe you see them as symptoms of the same problem Yes, thanks for understand what I meant, I realize that I may have worded that a little poorly. >I don't want to believe it and hope certain lines should be easy to draw with common sense. I wish I could do the same, I've just been disappointed by humanity so many times that I sometimes feel like a blackhole of emotional negativity has formed from all the horrific shit I have seen and can do nothing about. I'm glad that you are more optimistic than I TBH. >this comes down to the difference in worldviews where I see lolicon as not having any bearing on such things happening or not. Yes this is true, but as I linked above, in Japan child abuse and underground Child selling has been increasing and it correlates to relaxed laws on lolicon with numerous anime about child-love with adults. Again, this is hardly a big factor, but I forsee a POTENTIAL a path that porky-pedos can exploit to their own ends. >I'd like to believe lolicon is nothing more than what it is We can only hope so >I just felt like taking an opportunity to try That's fine, You presented a fairly well thought out argument. I suppose I've slightly over-reacted, merely because I am sick of the topic, I apologize if I insulted you. >I hope I'm not and the human race does in fact have an inherent capacity for rejecting a change of this sort I think I shall choose to try and hope as well. Thanks, this conversation ahs given me a bit of catharsis.
>>2865 This is a productive thread.
>>4916 >necrobumping this crap stop
(162.58 KB 600x855 1379625351868.jpg)
TBH I think that those who say "lolies don't have anything to do with childhood lel" are almost as stupid as those who think that all lolicons are mentally ill tier obsessed with children and future molesters.
>>4949 What the hell are you even trying to say Also screw you for wasting those dubs on this pointless necrobump
Good Work FBI/CIA
>>4912 I was going to send a much larger reply but ultimately I'd just be repeating ideas you've likely heard. This thread has worn itself out anyways I suppose. I wasn't exactly nice at first either but I suppose it was inevitable. I'm glad you got hope and catharsis out of this, pessimism can force your thoughts down bad paths. also, I'm not trying to avatarfag I just think these pics are appreciably cute/quality and fit the thread
>>4970 Based response and don't worry about 'avatar-fagging' we're not autistically harping about it like 4chan does (other than the reddit sage-spam poster)
>>4970 you can use avatars on twitter fagass
>or just thinking loli mean Pedophile? Yeah, someone should teach them lolicon is the word that means pedophile in English.
>>4996 Stay mad sagewhiner >>5016 I mean that was already explained in-thread but ok.
>France bans nhentai over loli shit Pedos BTFO lmao
>>5274 Good, but stop bumping this shit thread
>>2951 Lolicon in Japanese usage originated from Russell's Lolita complex book, moron.
>>5288 >t.didn't read the post Ok fag, stay mad.
is enko borderline pedo.
(678.88 KB 640x362 triage-x-4b.jpg.bmp)
I think it's pretty easy to write off lolicons as pedophiles but I think what the majority of them actually want, and this is the general theme that I actually see in /a/ is that I think they just like flat chested girls. Not all men are attracted to girls with huge breasts after all. This isn't really to say that lolicon is a good thing (which I don't really see it as) but rather the fact that there is always such a deluge of huge tittied bedunker girls out there that it gets kind of boring to see them after a while right and it's mostly just the girls that are rather mature but still loli-ish that are generally the most popular with people anyways. I think that banning lolicon is bad however for the sake that you can't actually write a plot about child sexual abuse without it being illegal, without the ability to express something that is actually real, it is much, much easier to sweep real life cases of that sort of shit happening under the rug.
>>5542 >it is much, much easier to sweep real life cases of that sort of shit happening under the rug I disagree. >matur but still loli-ish Petite. You want petite. This was mentioned before.
The primary contradiction on here is the conflict of sagepostfags and lolicon.
>>2951 >The meaning of ロリコン so does 小児愛 is almost same as pedophile if you look into japanese wikis ,dictionaries or blogs, and 小児愛 is the psychological term for ロリコン. Likely false. I know that Japanese people distinguish between "pedofiria", which has a criminal connotation, and "lolicon" which does not. Why would "shouniseiaisha" be any different?
(33.02 KB 562x442 lolicon paedo.jpg)
>>5758 >Japanese people distinguish between "pedofiria", which has a criminal connotation, and "lolicon" which does not. A moot distinguishment.
>>5759 >A moot distinguishment. No. Being called a pedo is serious because of the criminal connotation; it's like it's implied you're a child molester (coincidentally this is how people in the West use the word pedo).
>>5762 M8 read >>3902 It covers this and the whole "distinction" thing and why it's a moot point.
(14.13 KB 195x161 1418668806968.jpg)
The hypocrisy of much of the anti-loli drones who probably fap to shota trap and high school girl hentai is funny. Your indirect support for vapid liberalism will lead to everything you enjoy about weeb media be stripped away until nothing is left except for perhaps giant robots. And you consider yourself weebs you utter morons? Are you masochists? Make no mistake there is nothing communist about liking anime, just as there is nothing communist about liking any product of capitalism; it's a personal matter. But go on, continue to support wrecking your cope for capitalist doom & gloom. Surely this is in your best interest.
>>5767 >The hypocrisy of much of the anti-loli drones <hurr if you think sexualizing kids is bad you're a drone LOL >who probably fap to shota trap and high school girl hentai Nice projection there buddy >Your indirect support for vapid liberalism <the fact that liberalism promotes MAP, child drag queens and defends pedophiles like Steve Pinker is totally not important or that traps and lolis are a predominantly /pol/ obsession. loli-shit and arguments for it are libertarianism and libertarianism is almost always represented by self-serving fags using this "ideology" to defend their bourg decadence > lead to everything you enjoy about weeb media be stripped I don't need nor want to see an 11 year old undress constantly for "fanservice" in my anime, nor would its removal damage said anime. There are dozens of anime that are good or excellent that have little to NONE of this and it's obviously better off for it. >nothing is left except for perhaps giant robots Imagine being a "weeb" (lolicon) and thinking that there is nothing to anime outside fanservice/sexualization and mecha. Hilarious bad faith argument. >you consider yourself weebs No. I certainly haven't, nor would I want to. Liking anime =/= being a weeb or otaku, and as Miyazaki states, being one is nothing to be proud of, nor is it healthy, especially modern ones. >masochists <if you dont let us have our drawn CP they'll take everything else too This isn't the Jews being sent to the camps, it's a tiny portion of anime content that only exists because of Japan's excessive obsession with sex and capitalist need to commodify everything, including pedophilia >nothing communist about liking anime <product of capitalism Oh you're one of those dweebs: Anime has no essence that could be described as more capitalist or socialist. It's literally culture and therefore part of the superstructure that is being determined by the base. Even if anime exists today in a hyper-commercialised context that doesn't mean that this is the only way it can be expressed. >continue to support wrecking your cope for capitalist doom & gloom The fuck is this supposed to mean.
(17.90 KB 320x320 1422168991745.jpg)
>>5769 >Nice projection there buddy It's not projection, it's my observation of Twitter "leftists" who enjoy shota traps ("femboys") and watch high school romcoms. >that traps and lolis are a predominantly /pol/ obsession. Traps are a "leftist" Twitter obsession. >I don't need nor want to see an 11 year old undress constantly for "fanservice" in my anime, nor would its removal damage said anime. There are dozens of anime that are good or excellent that have little to NONE of this and it's obviously better off for it. >Imagine being a "weeb" (lolicon) and thinking that there is nothing to anime outside fanservice/sexualization and mecha. Hilarious bad faith argument. No more high school escapism. No more hyperviolence and gore. No more ass and titties. No more boy coming-of-age stories. No more moe. No more traditional fantasy. No more political ambiguity. No more waifus. No more risque comedy. And so on. I have witnessed vapid liberalism denounce these as "problematic" on multiple accounts, a mangaka (Ken Akamatsu) even alerted the Japanese government about how much of a threat vapid liberalism from the West is for manga. >and as Miyazaki states, being one is nothing to be proud of, nor is it healthy, especially modern ones. Miyazaki also said that non-otaku have no right to talk about otaku so shut the fuck up. >Japan's excessive obsession with sex and capitalist need to commodify everything, including pedophilia Japan isn't any more obsessed with sex than America and France are you dumb fucking chauvinist. >Oh you're one of those dweebs: Anime has no essence that could be described as more capitalist or socialist. It's literally culture and therefore part of the superstructure that is being determined by the base. Even if anime exists today in a hyper-commercialised context that doesn't mean that this is the only way it can be expressed. Anime as we know it is literally a capitalist expression of japanimation. No I don't give a fuck about hypothetical socialist anime because as a fucking materialist I don't talk in hypotheticals. >The fuck is this supposed to mean. You support the wrecking of the cope that helps you keep going in this hellworld.
>>5771 >shota traps >femboys Not even close buddy
(94.84 KB 1024x668 Nazi trap.jpg)
(633.33 KB 1756x2117 Z pol trap.jpg)
>>5771 > my observation of Twitter "leftists" who enjoy shota traps ("femboys") and watch high school romcoms And the hell does that have to do with this thread? >Traps are a "leftist" Twitter obsession See pics 1 and 2 related, these people are obsessed with traps. >No more hyperviolence and gore Great, we don't need unartistic blood pinatas for shitty edginess. It's boring and bland. >No more ass and titties Nice hyperbole "no fanservice" =/= no feminine assets. >high school escapism Fine by me, SoL-shit is cancer >No more moe Ok >coming-of-age Nope, removing loli-sexualization will not remove that. >No more traditional fantasy I fail to see how removing lolishit would do that. >political ambiguity See above >No more waifus Doesn't make sense given that people make waifus out of characters. Also Waifuism is escapism of the worst kind >No more risque comedy Not really. The only kind of 'comedy' that might end from banning sexualization of lolis would be lowbrow jokes about CP in the first place that aren't funny to begin with. > I have witnessed vapid liberalism denounce these as "problematic" Ok AND? Where does this tie into lolishit? Because some liberals scream about lolis? So fucking what? Who cares what they screech about. I don't like it because it's shit. >alerted the Japanese government about how much of a threat vapid liberalism from the West is for manga Ok, and? We don't like liberals here you dullard. That doesn't mean having no quality control. >Miyazaki also said that non-otaku have no right to talk about otaku <shut the fuck up! <Waaaaah I can't take criticism! I want my loli-cummies! Fuck off. Miyazaki was talking about people like himself. Most Otaku are not like Miyazaki by a longshot. >Japan isn't any more obsessed with sex than America and France <Japan isn't any more obsessed with sex than the other 2 most sexually obsessed countries Nice try fag >chauvanist For a lib-hater you sure talk like one >Anime as we know it is literally a capitalist expression of japanimation Anime is Japanese animation. It does not have an inherent ideology. This is the fucking iPhone argument all over again. >because as a fucking materialist I don't talk in hypotheticals Then you don't have anything to bring to the table and you're a useless doomer, who may see the problems of society but doesn't want to think about how it could be changed or what alternatives there are. >You support the wrecking of the cope that helps you keep going in this hellworld lolishit does nothing to help me keep going, if anything it contributes to this hellworld of mine.
>>5775 Oh look another.
(35.48 KB 960x720 1417123621310.jpg)
>>5776 This whole post reeks of a drone with about zero reading comprehension. >And the hell does that have to do with this thread? Read my first post again. >See pics 1 and 2 related, these people are obsessed with traps. So is "leftist" Twitter - /pol/ is irrelevant to my point. >Ok AND? Where does this tie into lolishit? Because some liberals scream about lolis? So fucking what? Who cares what they screech about. I don't like it because it's shit. >Ok, and? We don't like liberals here you dullard. That doesn't mean having no quality control. By siding with vapid liberalism you empower it you doo-doo head. This is politics 101. Plenty of fans in Japan aren't into loli but aren't aiding in the destruction of anime over it. >Fuck off. Miyazaki was talking about people like himself. Most Otaku are not like Miyazaki by a longshot. Your great man Miyazaki said that only otaku like him are allowed to criticize otaku, anyone else has no idea what they're talking about (ie. shut the fuck up). >Nice try fag Check yourself before you wreck yourself. >For a lib-hater you sure talk like one Taking issue with "chauvinist" is a great way of exposing yourself as an ignorant westerner that got triggered for being called out for orientalism. >Anime is Japanese animation. It does not have an inherent ideology. This is the fucking iPhone argument all over again. You are comparing a piece of technology with an artistic movement you dumb sack of shit. >Then you don't have anything to bring to the table and you're a useless doomer, who may see the problems of society but doesn't want to think about how it could be changed or what alternatives there are. The dialectic doesn't care about hypotheticals. Shill your idealism elsewhere. >lolishit does nothing to help me keep going, if anything it contributes to this hellworld of mine. Enjoy contributing to the wrecking of Japanese media. >>5775 Shut up hypocrite.
>>5777 Explain to me how shota traps = femboys. I don’t even care for loli shit, do what your heart contents. But explain how shota traps = femboys
(328.84 KB 911x1200 66218110_p1_master1200.jpg)
I like shotas more
>>5780 >all this cope Your entire diatribeis sheer schizophrenia, stay mad pedophile
Why are People of Colour in popular representations of loli lacking
>>5863 Random thought, maybe because lolis have the appeal of "dolls" and dark skin isn't doll-like. Dark skinned shotas are rare also.
(125.84 KB 453x360 Look, a faggot.png)
>>5875 yeah bitch so what?
>>5886 Time for the gay gulag for you

Delete
Report

no cookies?
__divBanCaptcha_location__