> I included "logically-fallacious diversionary tactics" near the bottom of the OP image for a damn good reason. I hope that I won't need to paste it repeatedly.
I'm unspeakably tired of repeatedly and excessively pointing out those logical fallacies for so many years as well. People need to focus on the issues covered by the OP image and address them.
> Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—involving a combination of rapid thrusting, a girthy penis/object, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread ignorance (often willful), apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anal and rectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to the anorectum's fragility relating to its anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. That is why such abuse must constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved—especially when considering additional factors such as a (self-)destructive mental disorder, a strong judgment-impairing drug, etc.
> Pornography featuring anorectal violence can have numerous effects on some viewers. It may serve as inspiration for their own activities, condition them to be aroused by suffering, and contribute to development of associated mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy at least for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with such inclinations, some affiliated with pornography companies, are having a field day with anorectal violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained and potentially-criminal hedonism is promoting societal decadence.
> This is happening because the vast majority of humanity never will place a high value upon the good health of at least someone else's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters even though the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of anorectal violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Justice has not been served in far too many cases — and may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed.
Here's a portion of a recent post of mine elsewhere that is very relevant:
< I see no scenario in which justice can truly be served without _some_ bloodshed: There are violent criminals who never were punished by any government for much too long — even going back several decades to the '90s for example with Rocco Siffredi. The _only_ way people such as he shall be punished for violent crimes committed so long ago—crimes that continue to inspire people to this day!—is through violent justice (one or more persons taking justice into their own hands, preferably involving quite fitting fatal rectal impalement).