Everything is discussed openly on the internet and every internet denizen claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the incel question. It is taboo in our republic.
The incel is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, misogynist, chinlet, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him an incel and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the incel. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.
Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the loser, the retard, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the incel wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the incel really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the incel. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:
1.One cannot fight the incel by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the system or he will forever corrupt it.
2.One cannot discuss the incel question with the incels. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3.One cannot allow the incel the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and “muh empathy” only to trap his enemy.
4.The incel has nothing to say about normie questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called blackpill “morality” of the incels is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to being cringe. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
Message too long. Click
to view full text.