>>4135 or you could specifically select those with a long term posting history and invite them into an off board communication place with one vote each

>>4139 I think more people need to enter into the irc, too, personally.

>>4138 not sure which is the best option, there are probably others also. It would be good to have a conversation about how it might be possible to implement some kind of a democracy however

Mod Moderator A person who moderates A person who makes discussion more moderate. The opposite of a revolutionary. This is my song to you mods. Contemplate it well. Meditate upon’t

Votes suck, arguments exist.

>>3847 what sort of parties do you have?

>>3848 comrade king you banned me thinking I was the castillian ban evading wtf you didn't even cared to watch the post history.

>>3845 /leftypol/ mods have no power over /GET/ mods and vice versa so it's not realistic to group them together

>>>/GET/45271 >>>/GET/45269 Imagine calling me an autistic sperg, using the 'muh tendies' meme against me, defending a neolib, perma-banning me for saying neurotypical + catalufo and still thinking that I am the one who is a reactionary. Listen up I don't give a shit if your community is 9 years old, do you see that sidebar up there? Now, it's not your community, is our community, fuck off, if you want intimacy and your own rules create a fucking Discord server like all the Twitter trannie mongs. You neurotypicals sure love to mock autistic children for safe spaces free from sensory overload, the special signs to avoid being shot by police and our 'sperging out', but you are acting like a bunch of hypersensitive snowflakes. I'd bet you were the motherfuckers spamming reports two months ago to get me banned in /dead/ and /leftypol/

>>3831 Based mods, tbh

>>3934 Reading the manifesto should be considered a requirement.

https://bunkerchan.xyz/.global/logs/leftypol/2020-01-22.html I have just experienced several threads I was in being deleted. Being surrounded by so much purging gives an uncomfy imageboard experience. I would like to see a rundown what kind of posts were exactly deleted, because the logs are unspecific (no reasons are given for deleted posts, leaving user insight into moderation process wanting) Comatoast, frankly, scares me.

>>3984 I have put forward a proposal that all bans must have a reason attached.

>>4041 Seconded.

>>3904 but Anon, it's not easy being green.

Is that a real board?

>>4097 yes. https://www.reddit.com/r/leftypol/

>>4094 >upvote system >everyone is namefag Gas yourself.

kill yourself spergzy

>>4094 Lol no. One of the major problems with is karma farming. It's why redditors are so irrating. They post LE RANDUM EPIC NARWAL BACON posts and puns everywhere for karma and reddit gold.

>>4086 you can literally always go created /dead/ on leftypol.org if you want a bespoke board for you niche community.

I lifted the ban

>>4089 Thanks

The hot takes thread was deleted too and even though there were good posts in it.

>>4073 The hottakes thread was out of control and most of the content was trash. It, itself, being an idpol thread. It was allowed to exist far longer than it should havfe, imo. >>4072 To me, bumplocking is justifiable if the thread in question is semi-related to the board or semi-deserves to be on it. Take a thread that belongs on a different board but is still elftist related, or, a thread that might belong in a general; Such as a duplicate USApol thread. That would be a good use of the bump lock feature. But having a thread that is totally irrelevant to the board or just random spam or some shit needs to be deleted, obviously. Or if there are many duplicates of a thread. You don't want the board to look static and unchanging. You want us to look alive, cause, well, we are.

>>4070 The point would be to make material conditions for workers so that they don't need to sell their bodies for money. How is that even an issue?

>>4068 Where did this notion that we need to delete idpol threads.come from? On 8chan /leftypol/ we had tons of idpol threads. I remember a decent number of posters who would use the anfem flag, and then there was hoochie of course. The point of being anti-idpol when I joined was to AVOID censorship like what goes down on /r/socialism (like the catgril drawfag ordeal). If a thread is annoying and shitty we can just sage it into oblivion. The only reason I can see to delete an idpol thread is if it keeps getting bumped by the same person. If a thread is being bumped by enough people (with the exception of a coordinated raid) then I think that I know the mods on /leftypol/ where unpolular, and I wasn't really around for the last year or two of it's existence so idk what went down. I know the community has matured around certain issues especially regarding actual existing socialism and I think that is great, I won't miss the users we lost in the /leftpol/ split. However, I don't think just because a lot of the anarkiddies are gone or have grown up that means we should start engaging in censorship. This isn't a party. Maybe this is a hard truth for some of you but we aren't going to lead the lead our class to revolution by posting on /leftypol/. That's why it is important that you engage in real world organizing. For me at least /leftypol/ is a way to chill out and escape the tedious social mores that exist in a lot of real world lefty organizations. >>4069 The W stands for WORKER you absolute imbecile. The whole debate is whether or not SWIRFdom constitutes class politics. Obviously SWIRFs are gonna disagree with your point, so by saying "SWERF vs SWIRF shit flinging is not class politics" ... YOU ARE LITERALLY ENGAGING IN SWERF VS SWIRF SHITFLINGING

>>4081 Fuck. First paragraph is supposed to end with >then I think that is reason enough to keep it around.

>>4026 Just don't use the VPN and it should be fine hopefully, we're almost ready to recruit so we'll make a topic (on leftypol prolly) when we get round to it

>>4027 >Just dox yourself to this aNoNyMoUs political extremist website, us rag-tag team of young-adults got you, JUST TRUST US Step it the fuck up, bunkerchan.

>>4035 I mean sure, you can switch IP every post if you want to, but then how are we supposed to look at your history and see if you're a good poster or not? It's up to you.

transition gender

You know, i am just throwing this out there; Nominally, people have become intrigrated into the staff through using the IRC network to build trust between the already existing staff via their handle.

Just use firefox. The shit is formatted for mobile usage in a browser.

>>3913 no

>>3940 How do we know when the time to create a newboard actually is, though? It's pretty obvious people want something new. Just make a newboard already, jesus, lol.

>>3937 Biased poll, forces you to select at least one board. There should be an option for no new boards; our population means it'll be creating a selection of empty posting graveyards.

>>3947 >There should be an option for no new boards That's a good point. But you and only one person in the /leftypol/ thread were against creating new boards. >our population means it'll be creating a selection of empty posting graveyards. Why do you think people are unable to post on more than one board?

>>3949 I'm also against new boards and I haven't posted in the /leftypol/ thread.

>>3952 Why do you oppose them?