>>21487>But I actually think this is because being rotund isn't really a negative in their culture.it never made sense to make porky fat.
1: the bourgeoisie can better take care of their health than the proletariat because they have more leisure time to exercise and diet plan. The proletariat (especially in the imperial core) has to scarf down calorie-dense but nutrient-deficient meals quickly at very specific times of day, with no time to calculate how it will affect them nutritionally.
2: As Marx points out in Volume 1 of Capital, the Capitalist is not a hoarder or a miser, but a man who constantly throws his capital back into circulation to earn more surplus value. If porky simply enjoyed all his surplus value immediately, he wouldn't be able to keep the cycle of accumulation going. Porky is not an enjoyer of mindless consumption. Rather, he is a man who throws what he would otherwise consume back into circulation.
3: Porky comes from USSR just after WW1, when starvation was a very real problem. It was politically expedient to depict Capitalists as fat in that environment.