Anonymous 2023-06-16 (Fri) 12:20:04 No. 18019
I want to learn physics properly because I was always bad at it both in school and uni and I feel embarrassed about it but I have no idea how to go about it.
cond-marx 2023-06-16 (Fri) 14:20:46 No. 18020
>>18019 I also did bad in high school in math and didnt even study physics. After graduation i just studied on my own with KhanAcademy. That was in 2016, so now you'll find way better resources online.
So if you have a little discipline and curiosity you can easily make up for that. It will give you good foundation for uni.
Anonymous 2023-06-28 (Wed) 09:36:41 No. 18467
>>18461 Not OP, but y' is just the differential of y. Find/calculate the integral and then plug in 0.
Use WolframAlpha to
check your answer.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/calculators/integral-calculator/ Wolfram takes language input, you can just write "find the integral of y' = (y - 2x)" for example, or any other math equation, and it gives you a step-by-step solution, slope field, etc.
Anonymous 2023-06-28 (Wed) 18:21:40 No. 18487
>>18467 But it has y on the right side… And there's g(x,y) that could be any function involving y and x, which means that it could even be non-linear.
Anonymous 2023-07-03 (Mon) 11:32:10 No. 18528
I'm struggling with a physics problem.
Anonymous 2023-07-09 (Sun) 11:09:31 No. 18603
I would love to post more about my field of research as a physicist, but it's so niche that I'd essentially doxx myself :(
Anonymous 2023-07-09 (Sun) 11:37:56 No. 18604
>>18461 What does Picard's little theorem say? What can you conclude about solubility?
Anonymous 2023-07-09 (Sun) 13:23:33 No. 18608
>>18604 But I don't know if g is continuous or differentiable!
Anonymous 2023-07-09 (Sun) 14:25:01 No. 18609
>>18608 Since this is the physics thread the answer is that a function is nicely behaved until stated otherwise
Anonymous 2023-07-11 (Tue) 02:59:14 No. 19004
>>18461 This could not have a solution at all depending on how "irregular" g may be. Is that the whole formulation of the problem?
Anonymous 2023-07-11 (Tue) 03:00:12 No. 19005
Awesome idea. I'm a phd in math, would love to help out in any anti capitalist projects that require math.
Anonymous 2023-07-14 (Fri) 15:46:13 No. 19050
>>19005 First of all you need to find a job at Lockheed Martin to destroy them from the inside
Anonymous 2023-07-31 (Mon) 11:22:00 No. 20080
Any opinions of experimentalists on the supposed high Tc SC? Kinda sounds too good to be true
Anonymous 2023-07-31 (Mon) 14:48:17 No. 20082
I've identified a need in my region for a product.
Anonymous 2023-08-01 (Tue) 20:31:01 No. 20091
>>18461 protip: if the question doesn't say to prove something, it's most likely because you can't do so and it wants you to argue against the conclusion
Anonymous 2023-08-16 (Wed) 20:03:48 No. 20179
>>18461 Exercise 2.4.103
https://www.jirka.org/diffyqs/html/sec_mv.html#exercise-215 Am I dumb? mx''+kx=0, m=5000, x(0)=0.1, x'(0)=1, the general solution is known to be A*cos(ot)+B*sin(ot) where o=sqrt(k/m).
But if I try to solve this, I get A=0.1, and B=1/o. So k=m/B² but I only know m, both B and k are unknown? What am I missing?
Unique IPs: 14