>>27232I have seen many threads about the games but not the studio, so I made this thread. But yeah, maybe it would be nice if TES threads were mostly merged into a general thread or something.
>>27231Yes, I would say they are mostly subsisting on their older releases right now because both TES VI and Starfield are not ready to "go gold", with TES VI probably being in a Half-Life 3-style development limbo where various prototypes, demos and assets are being made, but they do not even form an alpha development version. I also think the Skyrim Anniversary Edition release was likely their idea of giving a rather half-assed "consolation" to TES fans while simultaneously making even more money by selling them the same game but with a pack of paid mods included. Still, I think that most issues with their games nowadays can be chalked up to the decisions of whoever is involved in designing their gameplay and the lead writer Emil Pagliarulo, who apparently was a dungeon designer before being appointed to the then new position during Fallout 3's development and wrote that game's main quest with its daddy issues plot and BoS being good guys.