WebP zero day exploit lol. https://blog.isosceles.com/the-webp-0day/

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1696031012754.jpg (178.61 KB, 1080x1842, 1695948872055020.jpg)

Anonymous 2023-09-29 (Fri) 23:43:32 No.21755

WebP zero day exploit lol
https://blog.isosceles.com/the-webp-0day/

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 04:53:04 No.21758

I hate webp, why did it even become a thing?

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 09:13:59 No.21759

>>21758
because you can put hecking 10,000x10,000 pictures on your website and still afford to pay your server bills, rather than having reasonably sized JPEGs or even implementing the JPEG spec in full (pyramidal coding comes to mind)

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 09:48:52 No.21762

>>21758
Google wanted it.

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 11:48:31 No.21766

>>21762
This, basically. It's just like Microsoft IE back in the day but a bit less obviously trash. Chrome has generally good engineering but implements anti-features.

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 11:56:41 No.21767

Even images on this website are webp. Try and save that thumbnail kek. Yet you can't post webp. Weird.

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 11:56:54 No.21768

>>21766
Chrome is ass.

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 12:00:13 No.21769

>>21768
It is, but it's not IE is basically what I meant. Whatever the case, the shit Chrome does, FF needs to implement. Sometimes even broken shit.

Anonymous 2023-09-30 (Sat) 12:01:32 No.21770

>>21767
Trusted sources only ;) broken settings saved the day. I tried to fix it but I couldn't look too much into it. The way lainchan handles images is very convoluted for no reason.

Anonymous 2023-10-01 (Sun) 01:53:01 No.21779

Eh isn't it one of those exploits where a lot of things have to go wrong for it to work?

Unique IPs: 6