>>22447>Besides the lack of an about:config.Pretty much that, yeah, but also it had a bunch of unaddressed phone homes and security issues at the time I used it. Plus the whole chrome fork thing gives google the power to diverge from / insist upon their own vision for web standards and drag everyone allong. The web integrity thing is merely on hiatus, and the presence of chrome instances, regardless of degree of degooglification or initial compatibility with that, are pressure in their favor. They ain't ever adding jxl unless mozzila insists upon it, ect…