No.22683
don't shred, burn
No.22684
>>22683this, how are people so stupid?
>hurr im gonna rip the paper into 34563 recoverable puzzle pieces instead of turning it into dust No.22686
>>22685>Well businesses tend to shredwhy though? is this some glowie shit where intelligence agencies tricked people into believing shredding works so they can recover information? why would you ever shred instead of burn
No.22687
>>22686Shredding is done on-site where fires are often impractical. Wikipedia suggests US intelligence among other methods dissolved shredded documents into pulp, which seems reasonable.
No.22688
>>22686They don't usually have adversaries that are desperate enough to put them together. You always have to consider the threat model they are working with.
No.22692
>>22681ok but this doesn't eliminate the problem of having to exhume a bunch of wet shit-covered shreds from a landfill before reassembling them.
No.22693
>>22683Shred and then burn.
Or shred and then compost.
The latter is probably the best method, but it requires paper that isn't chemically treated in a way that would prevent it.
No.22694
>>22693shred, burn and then snort the ashes
No.22744
should be used for archeology. will probably be used for spying on political dissidents