>>1842897 I offer some of my personal arguments.
China today is the product of reform and opening up. As you may know, before the West started seeing China as a major threat, there was a considerable period of friendly relations between China and the West. China even acted as a rival to the Soviet Union geopolitically, despite being close allies in the preceding decades. This kind of China inevitably has been influenced by Western values. Some of the stances exhibited by Chinese individuals today resemble those of Eastern Europeans. However, China is not entirely a product of color revolutions. Unlike Eastern Europeans who view the pre-communist era negatively, many Chinese still hold onto socialist symbols, albeit often nationalist versions of them. You can find Chinese who admire Marx openly criticizing Western values and immigration of black people.
> Oh, that's sad to hear. I understand the critique of the North Korean government moving away from Marxism, yes, but I have heard about the comradery shown by Chinese soldiers in the Korean War. So soon after the devastating Chinese Civil War, and such a huge sacrifice at the time in a horrible war. Maybe it's strange for me to say this from so far away, but it felt like there was a real sense of fraternity, of shared struggle, among the Chinese soldiers fighting for a different nearby country, and it's sad to see that friendship evaporate over the following decades. I wonder how it happens.
< Of course, many of these views are 'benefiting from liberal propaganda,' even leftist groups are subjected to a lot of negative propaganda about North Korea from liberals. And some aspects of North Korea's external portrayal do indeed conflict with leftist positions. Last time I mentioned on Bilibili that not everyone going to North Korea would be shot, I received over a dozen comments from liberals criticizing me.On the other hand, due to the high development level of the West and the historical underdevelopment of Asia, Africa, and Latin America in comparison, admiration for white people from the West and discrimination against countries less developed than themselves should be common thoughts in many Asian, African, and Latin American countries.
The 'Belt and Road Initiative' is the stance of our government. The Chinese government approaches trade relations quite rationally. However, the general public tends not to dwell too much on relations with countries far away in the Middle East. Instead, they often see policies that appear friendlier to foreigners than to their own people domestically as a sign of poor governance.
In the 21st century, like many, or perhaps all countries in the world, China's ideology must also serve the interests of the nation and the people, even if it differs from Western ideology. Chinese society will also produce different ideologies: nationalist, social Darwinist, internationalist, anti-immigration, pro-immigration, and so on.
我给予一些我个人的论点
现在的中国是经历过改革开放后的中国，如你所知，在欧美尚未把中国视作一个大威胁之前，中国与西方拥有相当一段时间的友好时间，中国甚至在地缘上充当对苏联的对手——尽管在前几十年它们是挚友。这样的的中国不可避免的受到西方价值观的影响，一些中国人现在表现的立场你可以从东欧人身上看到类似的思想。但中国毕竟不是完全颜色革命的国家，同东欧人把前共产主义统治时期视作负面不一样，许多中国人依然把许多社会主义符号当作向往，虽然很多是被民族主义化的社会主义符号，你可以看见一个崇拜马克思的中国人大声谈论对西方价值观以及黑人移民的批评。
当然，这里面很多观点得“得益于自由派的宣传”，即使是左翼群体，也受到了很多自由派对朝鲜的负面宣传。以及朝鲜的从外部表现的一些地方确实和左翼立场有冲突
上次我在b站说去朝鲜又不会人人都被枪毙被自由派骂了十几条评论
另一方面，由于西方的高度发达以及亚非拉由于历史因素发展较西方落后，对西方白人的崇拜以及发展较自身落后的国家歧视应该是很多亚非拉国家都有的一种思想。
“一带一路”是我国政府的立场，中国政府对商贸关系表现出相当的理性。而民众则不会过多去考虑对远在中东的国家，他们更多会认为国内一些对外国人表现出大于本国人的友好政策是一种糟糕的表现
在21世纪的今天，如同世界上很多，或者说所有国家一样，中国的意识形态也必须服从国家与民族利益，即使与西方的意识形态不一样。而中国人也会分化出不同的思想，民族主义思想、社会达尔文思想、国际主义思想、反对移民的思想，接受移民的思想等等