No.531432
just the latest outrage bait, "would you rather run into a bear or a man in the woods?" most women saying bear lol
No.531441
>>531432makes sense since they don't leave their suburban jails that they would spend their time imagining retarded outdoor scenarios
No.531445
>>531432tbf i'd also be pretty wary of a man in the words
he might be a skinwalker
No.531462
>>531454That assumes you know how to survive, which in the case of brown bears is also not guaranteed. There's like 1 person on record ever being killed by a black bear though.
No.531463
>>531454Yeah
Idk why its so controversial when even historically women would never just be alone with a strange man in the woods, since they would be married and on their own property
Like, part of civilisation itself is in "arranging" or sorting out marriages so theres no dispute over sexual rights, where in the case of a man and woman stuck together, the man will obviously take advantage. This is also why you dont get men working with children in the same capacity, and historically, again, men have more commonly than not been "pedophiles" than guys settling down with a 30 year old professional like todays western norms. Women didnt even work with men proper until the industrial revolution.
Like, the controversy is just guys not being self-aware about their own gender, and women being hyper aware. I wouldnt want my wife or daughter or sister alone in the woods with a man either.
No.531465
gay bears are still men wtf stop being homophobic everyone
No.531478
>>531454What do you mean "statistically speaking"?
What is this troon yapping about? Around here women meet strange men in the woods multiple times a day and nothing happens.
It's amazing how many basement dwelling libs have come out of the woodwork to declare they side with tiktok women saying they don't want to see """bears""" (🙋🏽♂️🙋🏾♂️🙋🏿♂️) in the woods. Should remember this is tiktok and their chief pastimes are making fun of Somali and Mexican men.
No.531482
>>531478inb4
>no you stupid incel!!! not in the ACTUAL WOODS!!! women mean the SCARIER WOODS!!! the women you are seeing hiking alone in the woods are NOT REAL WOMEN, they don't even have COCKS 😝 No.531486
>>531485Post your girlcock I want to compare anon.
I know you don't go in the woods.
I know you don't actually think these women checking their car door handles for zip ties makes them safer.
I know where you heard about this, too.
No.531490
>>5314841. bears have bigger eyes, thus more powerful mace is needed to mace the entire eye.
2. who doesn't just use bear mace as the default? Like there's no law saying you can't bear mace a human. Even seen homemade mace with a bit of poison ivy in it.
No.531492
>>531490why have you seen homemade mace? that seems like a horrible idea considering half the reason why people use bear spray is to ensure the person isn't half-incapacitated and pissed.
you going to one of those "self defense bookstore/gyms" that mysteriously never gets harassed by police despite having a fuck 12 sign lol? I guess that's stupid, they'd try to get you to buy a hot piece
No.531493
>>531492I see blogs about it, not irl lol. I live in a poor walkability city in the desert.
No.531495
>>531490Yeah they're just bigger in general. Point is regular mace for people doesn't work for them. How big of a purse would you need to fit a can of bear mace?
No.531498
>>531495purses can be very large unless you're just buying a shitty fanny pack type thing made of polyester from target
oh god now i'm the one troonposting
No.531532
>>531495>>531498honestly we should normalize backpacks / wheeled suitcases. I used to use a lunchpail as a purse and that thing damn near destroyed my spine.
No.531538
Casual misandry is revolutionary.
No.531540
>>531539they were "normalized" a decade ago, youre supposed to wear them crossing your body
No.531545
>>531544wearing them differently doesnt make them less of a fanny pack?
No.531547
I'm glad feminism is back to being considered stupid thanks to all the transphobic and misandric bullshit they can't shut up about.
No.531562
>>531547Both cases are just thinktank psyops tho. Just first time was trying to portray them as cafe hippies, which didn't really do much, now they're trying to integrate them into reactionary spaces. Which isn't really doing much either since you see a clear divide between terfs and actual feminists, same way you see a clear divide between gamers and /v/ users.
No.531563
>>531562>since you see a clear divide between terfs and actual feminists90% of feminists in positions of power are TERFs.
No.531566
>>531563>in positions of powerThat's the kicker
No.531567
>>531566Real feminism has never been tried.
No.531568
>>531562>it wasn't real feminism>it's all a psyopHoly fuck lmao. Do you even Marx? A largely middle-class movement is doomed to be reactionary.
No.531569
>>531547a less viral example was right as the Drake/Kendrick drama started cooling down, somebody did the old "ladies are we dating bi men?" for the 195631302th time and got quote tweeted into the shadow realm by black twitter
it's not just TERF shit, The Discourse is infested with all manner of bigotry
No.531571
>>531568At least queers have the excuse that they're impoverished and miserable. Feminism is mostly women living cushy lives.
>>531570They'll bring up that "patriarchy" affects men negatively too and not once mention capitalism or communism.
No.531572
>>531567>>531568I feel indifferent to feminism due to my praxis not having compelled me to read any feminist theory, but I can tell when someone's misrepresenting it. We shouldn't need to rely on thinktank psyops to be critical of a theory.
No.531573
>>531570>>531571>They'll bring up that "patriarchy" affects men negatively tooAnd it's always done as a thought-terminating cliche to make people stop talking about how men are affected lol. Like bruh if those things are part of patriarchy, the people complaining about them are complaining about patriarchy. Why are you telling them to stop?
No.531574
>>531572Fine, let's disregard how 90% of feminists act (lmao). It's still an interclassist movement that has nothing to do with communism.
No.531575
>>531574>90% of feminists actYou removed the kicker
>It's still an interclassist movement that has nothing to do with communism.Correct.
No.531576
This clickbait shit made me find out a LOT of people think bears are part of the canine family and never even heard of "ursids".
No.531583
>>531576Roughly dog shapes, as many mammals are.
No.531590
>>531454Let's see those statistics.
No.531594
>>531571>They'll bring up that "patriarchy" affects men negatively too because it does
>and not once mention capitalism or communism.source
No.531700
>>531476don't expect morons on here to be historically literate
No.531704
>>531700>>men are statistically more dangerous than bears>>history shows men and women had minimal contact before the industrial revolution>doesn't elaborate, leavesit's got to be a bit of some kind, nobody is this dumb
No.531817
>>531780sorry man, but we don't generalize all males around these parts
that's not a man, that's a ukrainian man, it's different
No.531820
>>531780you might get more attention on social media with this weak outrage bait
No.531823
>>531820This is social media. Imageboards are social media.
No.531846
>>531823don't you think it's kind of retarded to 1.) copy and paste other people's videos from a relevant thread to another one 2.) downplay ukronazi sexual violence against minorities as "classic male behavior", even as some kind of low-effort baiting joke?
No.531849
>>531846not the same anon
No.531851
>>531820"I'm not taking your bait" -person who replied
No.531857
>>531849well it's either a lame joke or you're retarded imhobbqtbqh famalam
No.531898
the best numbers I could find were from the national park which had 25 homicides (10 were listed as women) from the five year period of 2014 to 2019. this does not include state parks which would no doubt increase the numbers. there are about 11 bear attacks every year with half of them being fatal in the US. So, the death rate is about the same, but only if you include men and women (although state parks might make it even when excluding men) and that doesn't account for nonfatal encounters either which probably skew heavily in favor of humans.
in summary, gun to my head i would not go with the bear, but i'm not positive that the numbers are accurate due to a lack of data for nonfatal encounters and state park numbers. the bears are definitely deadlier per capita though. allah forgive me for bumping this thread.
No.531902
>>531570why would anyone fight agaisnt sexism agaisnt men
No.531903
>>531902Because that's gender equality?
No.531904
>>531903well i guess but sexism mostly affects women. its like centering communism on fighting for middle class people
No.531907
>>531903I think "gender justice" is a better term since the genders arent equal
No.531908
>>531906then just be anti war instead of wanting women to die too
No.531913
>>531906>mansplaining>manspreadingThis discourse is so dead and even the mold gowing on it ran out of energy.
No.531915
>>531902>why would anyone fight agaisnt sexism agaisnt menBecause sexism is a holistic system that affects everybody, and due to its binary inclinations a bias against one "side" has its counterpart bias against the other?
>>531904>sexism mostly affects womenSexism affects everybody, and it's all one system in the last analysis. If you pick and choose what parts to get rid of, like you're at a buffet, then the parts that remain constitute the basis of the ideology to remain as well, which is that the sexes/genders ought to be treated differently.
>>531907>"gender justice"The main ideological basis for sexism in the west is that it's justice for Eve eating the forbidden fruit.
No.531916
>>531913>This discourse is so dead and even the mold gowing on it ran out of energy.Swap it for female hiker, bear/man encounter discourse. It's all so retarded.
No.531917
>>531574>It's still an interclassist movement that has nothing to do with communism.This is such a repetitive copout. True feminism is Communist and bourgeois feminism isn't real feminism. Feminism is essential to the liberation of the proletariat, because the women must be proletarianized and not mere unpaid domestic servants of their proletarian husbands
even in situations where the husband makes enough money for it to be a "single income household". And Communism itself isn't about "not being interclassist" It's about getting rid of class society. If some bourgeoisie (like Engels) want to help us, then good! Most of them won't. If a bourgeois woman gets beaten by her husband, she would benefit from feminism, real feminism, proletarian feminism, because she would be better off in a Communist society than she is under bourgeois society. The liberation of women is part of the liberation of the proletariat. In fact the proletariat will unite against the bourgeoisie once there is no other forms of oppression left for them to fight. The complaints about "idpol" always miss this.
>>531573Bringing up that men are effected negatively by patriarchy is a thought terminating cliche to make people stop talking about how men are affected by patriarchy?
No.531921
>>531916Just went hiking again today and none of the women out there jogging seemed aware of any of this
No.531927
>>531917>Bringing up that men are effected negatively by patriarchy is a thought terminating cliche to make people stop talking about how men are affected by patriarchy?That's how thought terminating cliches work. The point is to assert that feminism already covers these issues so it's unnecessary or even problematic and anti-feminist to talk about them outside the feminist framework. But then feminists do not discuss these topics of their own accord and if someone else brings them up, they drop the "patriarchy hurts men too" line and the cycle repeats. It's just a way to shut down talking about the subject. There's no interest in dissecting or combating this aspect of patriarchy, because as pointed out before feminism is more of a special interest movement for (usually bourgeois) women than a movement to abolish sexism.
>True feminism is proletarian feminism>…>we have to protect the bourgeois women from abusive husbands [vastly more an issue for working class women who are less likely to have support and more likely to be economically dependent on the abuser]jesus fucking christ almighty lol
No.532097
Liberal feminism is good actually considering the most pressing womens issue in developed world are reproductive right.
No.532169
>>531908women get to vote for wars that they don't have to die in. if you want to prevent wars from happening, you will give women consequences for their political positions.
No.532173
>>532097both sexes deserve the right to abortion but suggesting such is insanely outside of the overton window. the only two options are liberalism (hell for men) or conservatism (hell for both sexes)
No.532179
>>532173Men should be able to get legal/financial abortion.
No.532181
>>532173You are right that financial abortion is way outside the overton window, but by the time it wouldn't be, we'd probably already be at the "abolish the family" stage where the basic social unit has been so fundamentally changed that it would no longer be relevant anyway. In the meantime, abortion rights for women is popular and worthwhile and is also a partial solution to the same problem since it reduces the child support burden.
No.532182
>>532181>financial abortiontf does that mean?
No.532183
>>532097>Liberal feminism is good actually>the most pressing womens issue in developed worldyeah its good for the petit bourgeois, you said so as much
No.532184
>>532173>>532182japan lets you get an abortion legally if you are poor
No.532233
>>531454Not even remotely close lol
No.532234
>>531569It's bullshit distraction created by the FBI
No.532238
>>532185>trollface is more popular than everdo you live in 2011?
No.532264
>>532238It's the only "rage face" that survived and is still constantly used even by zoomers.
No.532281
>>532264Now that school's out I wanna make a hobby of de-wojakifying memes, replacing them with rage faces, animals and such.
No.532282
>>532281 (me)
like I know that memes back then had a different spirit to them and weren't so whedonistic, but like thinking about how to redesign memes would probably be an interesting graphins design excercise.
No.532688
>>532679They were being friendly. Motherfucking incels strike again.
No.532692
>>532679we did it guys, we found the most alienated from nature person.
Unique IPs: 36