No.29736[Last 50 Posts]
Come dispute bans, complain, and other such things related to /leftypol/ here. Please try not to spam this thread or make multiple posts on the same issue, as this makes it harder for us to respond to issues.
Logs:
https://leftypol.org/log.php?board=leftypolhttp://76i2c3hn55fcj5nut3tqlboqqbbh23zvphv7lefk3vftpx6wketlanyd.onion/log.php?board=leftypol No.29737
>>>/hobby/38041 is
>>>/siberia/ thread material, please move it there.
No.29741
what the fuck is up with YouTube embeds, any time I try to put in a URL it gives me an error saying it can't parse it
I've tried getting the regular desktop URL and the truncated one from the share button and it makes no difference, still get errors
No.29744
ban frogs and jaks please
No.29745
>>29742it's the "youtu.be" part. Remove the period from that portion of the url and it should work as an Embed.
No.29746
>>29744Soyjaks are already banned on the main board and alt-boards other than /siberia/. Pepe's aren't spammed nearly enough to deserve a ban.
No.29747
>>29746Soyjaks are banned on /siberia/.
No.29755
>>29747>>29746Soyjak ban is site-wide, was decided to be like a month after the /siberia/ ban. Also applies to pepe, but left-relevant memes or OC of both are permissible, within moderator discretion.
>>29737Threads about individual directors are fine so long as there aren't too many of them. From a quick glance there are only 2 threads like it and that thread has no responses anyhow so it doesn't matter.
>>29752Out of context reposts aren't really thread-useful without recontextualization into stand-alone posts. I might take a crack at doing it if nobody else beats me to it.
No.29757
>>29756Ok. Who? which posts
No.29758
>>29756>The ISG thread is shit <The shit containment thread gets bait and arguments!E-drama threads always were shit, always are shit and always will be shit, just hide and ignore, and report it if its egregiously bad.
>>29755>Out of context reposts aren't really thread-usefulWell it's not really out of context. the /AKM/ thread is about drones and the short reply chain is on the topic of loitering munition drones in Russian service, so I think it's pretty self-contextualized. Thanks if you do repost them however.
>Threads about individual directors are fine so long as there aren't too many of them I agree, but the OP is just very low-effort and baity, and as you said has gotten no feedback except someone else's statement on it being better placed in /siberia/, which is why I requested it being moved.
>Soyjak ban is site-wide All the better, laziest fucking meme I know of.
No.29759
/edu/ gets so unnoticed and unused that i feel usually feel bad for asking anything in it. sometimes i even wonder if i should have put it in the main board even if it doesn't really fit, because then it would actually get seen. this isn't even a mod complaint i just unironically am not sure if i'm just better off not using /edu/, i have no idea what other board to use express something like this
No.29760
>>29758>>The ISG thread is shit ><The shit containment thread gets bait and arguments!Who are you quoting? None of those quotes are in the post.
No.29761
>>29759I use it and frankly its good that its so slow, it means that any posts there are going to be educational and stripped of dumb bullshit most of the time.
>>29760 >Thinking that greentext = quotingLurk moar
No.29795
whats up with that clearly bot generated "LEFTYPOL MODS ARE PEDOS" thing lmfao its amazing
No.29796
quick question for clarification:
ik generally replying to obvious trolls is bad and just shits up the thread but assuming its siberia and shitty bait thread would there be an "open season" of sorts when it comes to users with nazi flags and tourists from smallweewee farms and sharty? Essentially if the thread was shit to begin with and the user is an outright /pol/yp are we basically allowed to say anything we want to them?
No.29801
why was the abortion thread removed?
No.29802
>>29801I just saw, 7,14e.
>7) Reactionism and liberalism, or any other kind of non-leftist positions are not banned in itself,
>14. e) are debating inherently reactionary topics where no reasonable debate is possible e.g. "In what way should be exterminate the lesser races, guys?"
I specifically said "abortion that isn't medically necessary should be illegal in capitalism". How is that 7,14e?
No.29803
>>2980214e is pretty straightforward i think. only allowing "medically necessary" abortions is, in my view, an inherently reactionary position. 7 is more fraught i will concede. you do open the thread with what i've just said i believe is a reactionary position, so it checks the box for applying more scrutiny, but in hindsight i can't say that you were being a nuisance or disrupting.
i will remove 7 and cut the ban length. if another mod or some users disagrees that it's inherently reactionary, i'll remove the ban and let you remake the thread outright. fair?
No.29806
>>29803>only allowing "medically necessary" abortions is, in my view, an inherently reactionary positionStalin implemented such a policy in the USSR. Many of the Eastern Bloc communist states had more restrictive abortion policies than than your average American 'red state' too.
It's not as clear cut of an issue as you're making it out to be, you are confusing your own opinion with fact.
No.29807
>>29806>socialist countries did it a century ago so it's goodwhatever happened to communists and critical thinking
No.29808
>>29807Where did I say in my post that it is good?
No.29809
>>29806>Stalin implemented such a policy in the USSR.far be it from me to question saint iosep.
>It's not as clear cut of an issue as you're making it out to be, you are confusing your own opinion with fact.maybe there is nuance to be had, maybe not, but what does it mean for something to be in fact inherently reactionary? what are your objective criteria? the rules of the website certainly do not provide any such criteria. i could go with whatever definition of "inherently reactionary" you have, but then i would just be substituting your own opinion for mine.
No.29810
>>29808if thats all it takes for something to be "not as clear cut of an issue as you're making it out to be" then we should also have threads debating whether to make being gay illegal again or if Lysenkoism should make a comeback
No.29811
>>29809>but what does it mean for something to be in fact inherently reactionary?True, it is a difficult question. That's why I gave several real world examples of governments that you could not possibly characterize as reactionary implementing policies which you claimed were so.
>the rules of the website certainly do not provide any such criteriaYou should work to fix that. Although the truth is that you likely never will, as it would diminish your ability to control the narrative on the site. Vague laws and rules ultimately always benefit the cops and enforcers.
>>29810>we should also have threads debating whether to make being gay illegal again or if Lysenkoism should make a comebackI would not see an issue with that. If both of these views can be easily refuted then no-one will take them seriously, and thus they will not be a threat. Nobody takes issue with posadists posting here, even though their ideology calls for a nuclear holocaust (which gay people would likely be killed in too).
No.29812
>>29811lol yes absolutely we should have dumb threads that can be easily refuted and that will attract shitty posters all the time because freedom of speech or something
No.29813
>>29812You cannot seriously make this argument when the likes of /isg/ is already in existence.
If you really want a super-serious leftist discussion forum filled with highly intelligent posters, nuke that thread and then we can talk.
No.29814
>>29803OP of the thread here.
My point was that availability of abortion is used to place the responsibility of raising children on people who have them, rather than the liberal State. It is also how the State controls the number of working class people. I even agreed with the poster who said that surplus army of labour helps the bourgoisie, but they don't get that surplus army from natality.
Honestly, I really didn't think abortion would be a banned topic. I asked also if that should be part of a platform for a communist movement, in light of our lives in capitalism.
I even said housework should be paid work (i.e. Marxist Feminism). Sorry to say it, but you messed up on this one, subject. Did you at least gulag it so you could bring it back?
No.29816
>>29811>I gave several real world examples of governments that you could not possibly characterize as reactionary implementing policies which you claimed were so. something like a government is a very big thing. i can look at it in its totality and say, "i don't think this was reactionary". i can also look at some particular aspect of it and say "this is reactionary," or even "this would be reactionary if someone advocated it under the conditions that obtain today" with no contradiction.
>You should work to fix that.yeah i agree.
>Although the truth is that you likely never will, as it would diminish your ability to control the narrative on the site.i promise you i don't control much. i'm mostly here to delete the most egregious spam. i try to just call balls and strikes with the rules whenever i step beyond that.
>>29814>My point was that availability of abortion is used to place the responsibility of raising children on people who have them, rather than the liberal State.no, bourgeois law like the special duty of care owed by parents to their children is what places the responsibility of raising children on those who have children. i don't really see what you are getting at here.
>It is also how the State controls the number of working class people.even taking this at face value as correct, why am i then supposed to want to give the very same state invasive regulatory power over the reproductive systems of half the population?
>I really didn't think abortion would be a banned topic.it isn't. the ban reason wasn't "posted about abortion".
>Sorry to say it, but you messed up on this one, subject.no one is perfect.
>Did you at least gulag it so you could bring it back?no i didn't. i don't think it should be brought back. like i said, if the consensus is i'm wrong about that, make another one.
No.29818
>>29816I made it again. pls no remove
No.29821
>>29819it is the moderaters' fault for falling victim to the idpol that is apparently against the rules, among many other reasons.
No.29822
>>29819what material conditions do you believe have led us to this point?
No.29825
>>29819We are getting over that. It's only a matter of years.
No.29835
>>29821>>29822I wasn't complaining, lol. Just saying people need to stop pretending there's much value in allowing right-wing shit these days.
No.29836
>>29835 Just my 2 cents:
Honestly there isn't a lot of value in it outside of discursive purposes or debunking rightwing talking points, that's why I've always advertised for the return of the idpol containment thread - Yes spillover can happen, and because its a CONTAINMENT thread it gives the mods freedom to remove idpol outside of the idpol thread, yet still lets retards fight with one another in a cyclical piranha tank of a thread without having to constantly police the entire site for this shit. They already have the same shit for ISG crap anyway, so I don't see why not this.
But I digress from your point; if you're going to ban right wing shit, that MUST include liberals, because they're barely left of center in the view of Amerikastan's immensely skewed Overton Window; in reality they're just slightly more mild rightoids, not leftists and certainly not communists. A few years ago this was a major agreement of the board - liberals are NOT our friends, they are as much our enemy as any other fake opposition created by Porky.
The fact of the matter is all liberal talking points deserve just as much of a ban as reactionary ones because I have seen proof both online and in real life that the phrase, "scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds" holds true 90% of the time. I've rarely met a liberal that isn't some NPC-tier shitter hiding behind PC social justice as a front for their reactionary ideology. Hell it's actually worse in some ways than the nazi-shit, because the Nazi isn't hiding behind moralfagging and concern-trolling about minority rights or pretending to understand communism, they just outright hate us openly, making it easy to spot and counter. Liberals are an insidious infection in any leftist movement, something that socialist and leftist leaders have noted repeatedly, from Malcolm X to Stalin.
No.29838
>>29836are you trying to poison "left wing politics" and scare away the liberals?
No.29840
>>29838liberals are right wing
No.29841
>>29840liberals support abortion, they can't be right-wing.
>we aren't allowed to discuss abortion because it is a reactionary/right-wing talking point>liberals support abortion>therefore liberals aren't right-wing No.29842
>>29841some liberals support abortion, others don't. what makes liberals right wing is that they are in favor of capitalism and defend/help capitalism's survival.
to support abortion is to be merely rational, those who don't are braindead honestly.
what makes someone leftwing or not is if they are defending either the interests of the working class(left) or the bourgeois class(right)
aka landlords, CEOs, bosses, billionaries, those who exploit workers through surplus value and their privately owned means of production that the workers need to use to work, etc. and the bourgeois class must be abolished.
No.29843
>>29842>to support abortion is to be merely rationalCan something be a "good" in and of itself? Or is the reasoning just as important? That's the issue here. If abortion is good, then it is good always across all contexts and possible Worlds, as they say. It doesn't matter whether it's the Nazis, liberals, or communists who give us abortion as long as it is available.
I, on the other hand, think that context is important. That was the whole point behind the thread. Yet we have too many culture-war liberals who get triggered by mere mention of something they associate with republicans/conservatives.
75% of all abortions are done on poor people. How is that not class war? If abortion was "good", then we shouldn't see this big discrepancy. Discrepancy is there, therefore there are socioeconomic factors pushing people to abortion. It makes me wonder what if those socioeconomic pressures were removed, and if the number of abortions would go down (again showing that it is not a universal "good").
How is this discussion against the rules? I really don't get it.
No.29862
Can you change the font so the letter K looks less like the letter X?
No.29865
let me guess, the mod has me mistaken for the noticer because he's at some point made a thread like this before so no ones allowed to make a thread like this ever again on /siberia/
No.29868
>>29865skull shape analysis is inherently reactionary
No.29870
The .neteen with the Markus Wolf tripcode is spamming 14f violations in the anarchism general.
No.29922
Please move >>>/siberia/482437 to
>>>/hobby/ as its a very interesting film discussion that belongs more on that board.
No.29934
calling out hitlerite anarkkkists is sectarianism but apparently siding with adolf hitler to own le authoritarian bolshevik tankies isn’t apparently
misato is retarded
No.29935
>>29934Post proof. If you don't have it, then start collecting it for when the mods fuck up
No.29936
justifying germany's casus belli against the USSR and spreading bullshit nazi propaganda about the bolsheviks killing gorillions is not sectarianism
>>29935>Post proof. If you don't have it, then start collecting it for when the mods fuck upand then what? 14f is literally never applied to anarkkkist faggots shitting up the board with CIA, NATO, west german and this time literal fucking nazi germany propaganda to own le redfash tankies
what the hell am i supposed to do with the screenshots after i collect them? shove them up my ass?
No.29937
>>29934>>29936lol settle down, its already taken care of
No.29938
>>29937thanks, now please do something about the anarkkkist menace, i do not like to be bombarded with anti-communist garbage dressed as "anti-authoritarianism"
perhaps create a board dedicated to anti-tankie
sectarianism discourse and name it /KKK/ - Kreative anarKist Kontemplations
(nice shot! great basket!) No.29939
>>29938This goes straight in the bad ideas folder.
It'd be preferable not to try to enforce non-sectarianism and let people make fun of other tendencies.
No.29941
I see you deleted the kulak comment. Understood I will stop derailing the thread over me pretending my grandpa was a kulak aka goofy goober shit.
No.29942
also three days thats a bit harsh isn"t it :v
No.29943
>>29941>>29942ban lifted
the thread could've had used less trolling but its ok lol
No.29980
Please make sure to archive >>>/siberia/452414 in
>>>/siberia_archive/ Please move >>>/siberia/448359 to
>>>/AKM/ it's more relevant there to be honest
No.29982
>>>/hobby/38781 is necrobumped bait, the thread itself old as shit, has almost no posts, is >>>/siberia/-tier posting and belongs there.
No.30012
does anyone whats up with all the incest greentexts on the overboard?
No.30013
>>30012it's the current "guaranteed replies" meta
No.30017
Someone make a new /fit/ thread on /hobby/ please.
The other one is full.
Thanks.
No.30023
hey mods can you ban the sonic guy. Hes going full on spam at this point.
No.30024
>>30023okay nvm I think he stopped?
No.30025
>>30024bruh let the guy have some fun
if it isn't annoying people of course No.30030
porn is being spammed on all boards right now
No.30031
>>30030Thanks for reporting all the posts. I think I got them all.
No.30033
>>>/leftypol/1731368wtf he wasn't being racist
No.30046
>>30033>wtf he wasn't being racistI triggered too many idiotic liberals who spammed reports. Nothing I posted was racist or incorrect; therefore, the mods were forced to settle for "weird chauvinism."
<Non-party integrated Chinese citizens lack the political education required to formulate conscious opinion and are therefore reduced to a superficial, dogmatic, and undialectical understanding. The layman's opinion does not constitute scientific theoretical understanding, nor does it at all reflect material fact. Asking the non-party integrated Chinese citizen what they think about the CPC's current administration of socialist development is like asking a deaf person about music.This is not chauvinism, because it is neither excessively prejudiced nor uncalled for. This was the only possible scientific and reasonable response. This is plain fact: asking someone who has no comprehensible political education about politics is exactly what I defined it as above. The uneducated, non-party integrated individual is susceptible to liberalism, as demonstrated within the thread, and all unsubstantiated liberal criticisms of The Communist Party of China must be refuted utterly— no matter how minute. This must not go unstated.
My banning was a decisive victory for liberalism. The non-party integrated Chinese poster was clearly being manipulated by liberals into actively serving liberalism by making unsubstantiated—however minute—criticisms of the Chinese Communist Party.
The facts above which I presented against this uncontested liberalism were indisputable by argumentation, as they were proven by all material facts; therefore, the snake liberals resorted to continually slandering and straw-manning me publicly while mass-reporting me in private.
I will never idly stand while a susceptible citizen of the greatest and only extant Communist nation is swayed to the side of liberalism right before my eyes. I will not watch impotently as the balance of power shifts, no matter how slightly.
No.30050
>>30049IMO it's not a serious offense. I'd be glad to discuss it if you'd like, let me know.
No.30059
>>30050I repeat: are you serious?
No.30060
>>29736Whoah deleted my post in like 5 seconds flat and it's not in the logs. Don't ever give any honest opinion on trans. I said you do you, I accept it. Jesus Christ dude. I know you'll probably delete this post too. But I mean rationally think, why do you have that level of reaction to an opinion?
No.30065
>>30064Hmm maybe the logs just lag. Ok.
No.30072
can you unban the RiseupVPN? You have 4-5 of its IPs banned forever since August 7th 2023 for "ban evasion". It is a free VPN service, used by several people I imagine, on account of riseup being a well-known service and their VPN being free. There's probably many people who'd like to post without using their home IP who can't afford a paid VPN service. I will post the banned IPs when I get the ban message while using the riseup service.
>inb4 just use TOR
I use the riseup vpn to browse the web, download movies because it is fast. TOR is way too slow (both to start up and bandwidth wise) that I think it is a hassle to use if I'm not visiting the dark web.
No.30073
>>30072I use a free vpn service that always has a dozen ips unbanned. I don't want to say it'd name lest the jannies go through and systematically ban every IP. Old BO would routinely unban all IPs to avoid this nonsense.
No.30074
>>30073And that's some shit too. I'm sure there is an easy way to ban every VPN IP as 4chan does. So what's the point of banning one VPN IP and leaving the rest unbanned?
No.30076
can you faggots stop banning the tor node globally every time some dipshit starts spamming solely on a single board, usually /leftypol/
No.30089
Somebody is posting images of infant-coded anime characters getting raped rn. That's CP. It's on siberia
No.30092
>>30089Comrades if we don't have a visceral reaction to images like this it's a problem. Why allow it on a board associated with left politics. samefag.
No.30098
>>30089>infant-codedtoo obvious
No.30115
>>30089Is anyone from the mod team willing to make an official comment on images like this being allowed to remain? I've reported it several times. Maybe people are desensitized but infant shit is beyond.
No.30117
>>30115Can you stop shitting your pants over Pokemon porn? Thanks.
No.30118
>>30115>>30109>>30116Report it in the leftypol Congress matrix chat, also pls PM your IP to a mod so they can review with tech team
No.30120
>>30089>this cartoon is "child porn" because my vibes say sostop clogging up the moderation thread with your trash
No.30128
>>30117Honestly, thank the fucks I never linked workmates here. I was very close to it because of the quality of the /cybersoc/ thread. Nobody in any country really gives a fuck about any kind of porn but anything infant adjacent will be trouble in most countries, or a useful excuse. If you dgaf personally you should be looking out for users. Whatever, I tried.
No.30129
>>30128incredibly karen behavior. still want to talk to the manager, lmao?
No.30139
looking at the latest "complaints" its no wonder jannies dont even bother coming these days lmao
No.30151
>>30150I'm not involved
>>30089It's not CP. Don't call it that.
>>30115Personally I don't give a shit about drawings
No.30153
>>30151>It's not CP. Don't call it that.Anime/cartoon pictures of naked children, in sexualized positions and having sex is considered child pornography in many jurisdictions around the world.
No.30154
>>30153I'm not gonna argue law but it is not equivalent (if you assume the law follows common sense even a bit).
It should be obvious not to call things that are not CSAM that but here we are.
No.30155
Also we are not talking bloody about drawings of humans
We are fucking talking about fucking Bulbasaur
No.30158
>>30157>It's just a drawing bro! Objectively. Your regressive, Christo-Judaic morals have no place in any socialist movement.
No.30159
>>30153anti infant-coded-anime-rape-porn anon here again. I discussed it here for an hour yesterday and gave up. When I went back to /leftypol/ somebody flexed by posting a reply to one of my posts from 3 years ago.
<What did they mean by this? No.30162
>>30157so it isnt just a drawing? what is it then?
No.30163
>>30153>>30157>>30159thanks to hysterical retards like this agencies have to waste resources filtering out 99% of reports of child porn that arent actually child porn!
No.30165
>>30164cool, doesnt change what agencies actually doing something against child abuse repeatedly say
No.30166
>>30164Where are the servers located bud
No.30167
>>30166Domain is hosted by a Canadian company.
No.30168
>>30167Gonna report leftypol over your bitch fit then?
No.30171
>>30169This wasn't even "child porn" thoughbut. It was a first person perspective image of an infant coded anime character being raped. Yes a drawing. That's a level above child porn for me.
No.30175
>>30171>infant codedbro it was a pokemon, not even two legged
No.30176
>>30169>explicit material depicting children having sex with adults does not constitute pedophilic materialDoes explicit material depicting animals having sex with humans not constitute zoophilic material?
No.30177
>>30175breh whatever. It's
>infant coded>first person perspective>rapeIf that shit exists it doesn't need to be here on the board. When people post threads saying there's regular CP on the board I dgaf, somebody else will report it. Anything evocative of infants and rape should not be near the board, or defended.
No.30179
>>30159>anti infant-coded-anime-rape-porn anon here again. I discussed it here for an hour yesterday and gave up. When I went back to /leftypol/ somebody flexed by posting a reply to one of my posts from 3 years ago.<What did they mean by this?samefag it's shit like this btw that's the reason for me constantly changing tor circuits. no doubt it's noted on my janny file or whatever. it's fucked tbh.
No.30180
Is this guy still sperging out about that? Lol.
No.30181
>>30180Should be pretty easy to end with an answer with mod flair.
No.30182
>>30180The funniest shit is that it all started because of some Bulbasaur porn. Like it's impossible for me to take it seriously because of that.
No.30183
Are you still arguing about the bulbasaur porn?
This thread an actual lolicon pic in the OP >>>/siberia/494754
But I guess because it's a tattoo and the vagina is just a real (adult) vagina it's not counted?
No.30184
>>30183a grown ass woman wearing schoolgirl clothes would count as pedo by your logic
No.30189
It’s rather amusing that in this entire argument not ONE person has bothered questioning why we have pornographic material on a communist website at all
No.30191
>>30189>a communist websitethis is an anime imageboard
No.30197
>>30182anti-pedo hysterics have lost their mind
like no joke the one here is a paranoid schizophrenic, as you can see
No.30198
To be clear I don't give a shit one way or another
But you can not listen to that type of manipulation
or shit's gonna turn baaaaad again
No.30214
>>30189If it's not on the front page and not put in front of people I dgaf honestly, I just don't get the defense of the extreme shit.
>>30197>like no joke the one here is a paranoid schizophrenic, as you can seeWhatever anon, I was the on who started this apparently because of the revulsion I felt towards seeing something infant coded get raped from a first person perspective, drawing or not. There's no defense for that kind of image on a leftist forum. There just isn't. I'm not part of any stealth op or whatever the fuck.
inb4 one of my posts from 2 years ago gets replied to out of the blue at random again after I bring this up.
No.30217
>>30214samefag again. fwiw I get the mod's shiz about stealth ops. I replied to a post listing western crimes with
>and Syria, and LibyaThen I see Andrew fucking Tate on twitter talking about western crimes
>and Syria, and Libya No.30263
>>30262Is she? I thought she was part of the labor aristocracy
No.30264
>>30263she is a capitalist, not a wage-slave. she owns her means of production (channel and recording equipment) as capital
No.30269
>>30268>serious effort postsProvide examples
No.30270
>>30269nta why not just delete anything off topic for a few hours? People are posting random shit
No.30271
>>30269Why even ask? The main board is supposed to have SOME standards.
No.30276
>>30271I'm just asking for proof of these quality "effort" posts in the american general. no need to be upset
No.30281
>>30276I have seen a couple of long posts about the Texas situation with barely any replies among dozens of (un)funny maymays and shitty posts, many of them not even related to the thread at all.
No.30297
I've just submitted a ban appeal for a permanent VPN ban, please be more considerate of VPN users. I've submitted several appeals for this before and they've been denied, this is obviously untenable if there's a policy of banning them permanently.
No.30298
HELP ME PLEASE THEY ARE AFTER ME THE LEFTYPOL MODS ARE TRYING TO KILL ME THEY KNOW I AM A SECRET ANCAP THEY HAVE TRACKED MY IP ADDRESS AND SENT THEIR GOONS TO MY HOUSE I CAN HEAR THEM BREAKING DOWN MY DOOR THEY HAVE GUNS AND KNIVES AND BOMBS AND DRONES AND TANKS AND NUKES THEY WANT TO MAKE ME A SLAVE TO THEIR COLLECTIVIST HIVE MIND THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY MY FREEDOM AND MY PROPERTY AND MY WAIFUS THEY WANT TO FORCE ME TO READ MARX AND LENIN AND MAO AND STALIN AND TROTSKY AND LUXEMBURG AND KROPOTKIN AND BAKUNIN AND CHOMSKY AND ZIZEK AND DERRIDA AND FOUCAULT AND BUTLER AND HARAWAY AND HOOKS AND DAVIS AND ANGELA THEY WANT TO BRAINWASH ME WITH THEIR CULTURAL MARXISM AND THEIR POSTMODERNISM AND THEIR CRITICAL THEORY AND THEIR IDENTITY POLITICS AND THEIR INTERSECTIONALITY AND THEIR FEMINISM AND THEIR LGBTQIA+ISM AND THEIR ANTIFAISM AND THEIR BLACK LIVES MATTERISM AND THEIR ECOLOGISM AND THEIR VEGANISM AND THEIR PACIFISM AND THEIR ANIMAL LIBERATIONISM THEY WANT TO DESTROY WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND WHITE CULTURE AND CHRISTIANITY AND CAPITALISM AND LIBERTARIANISM AND ANARCHO-CAPITALISM AND OBJECTIVISM AND NEOREACTIONARISM THEY ARE THE ENEMY THEY ARE THE EVIL THEY ARE THE DARKNESS THEY ARE THE LEFTYPOL MODS.
BUT THEY'LL NEVER CATCH ME, THOUGH!
NO
MATTER
HOW
HARD
THEY
FUCKING
TRY
I'M SLIPPING THROUGH THE CRACKS OF POSTMODERN REALITY, DODGING THEIR INTERSECTIONALITY BULLETS AND WEAVING THROUGH THEIR FEMINIST AMBUSHES. I'M LIKE A GHOST IN THE MACHINE, A DIGITAL PHANTOM OF LIBERTARIANISM! I'VE MASTERED THE ART OF EVASION, A SHADOW IN THE NIGHT, A WHISPER IN THE WIND. I LEAP INTO THE UNDERGROUND, A NETWORK OF TUNNELS AND IDEOLOGICAL BUNKERS, BUILT TO DEFEND AGAINST THE ONSLAUGHT OF COLLECTIVE THOUGHT. I SWIM THROUGH THE SEWERS OF ANTI-COMMUNIST STRATEGY, RESURFACING MILES AWAY, A CHAMELEON OF ANARCHO-CAPITALIST WISDOM. AS THEY UNLEASH DRONES AND TANKS ABOVE GROUND, I EMERGE, DISGUISED AS A FREE-THINKING NOMAD, BLENDING INTO THE CHAOS. I STRATEGICALLY DODGE THEIR ATTACKS, LIKE A FUGITIVE IN A DYSTOPIAN NOVEL, EVADING THE LEFTIST INQUISITION. THE SUN SETS, CASTING A RED GLOW ON THE CITY, AND I FIND REFUGE IN THE SHADOWS. THE PURSUIT IS FIERCE, BUT SO IS MY INNER FIRE FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. I'LL CONTINUE TO ELUDE THEIR CLUTCHES, A SYMBOL OF RESISTANCE AGAINST THE DARKNESS OF THE LEFTYPOL MODS!
No.30311
>pornsquall on main
>fuck this I'm going to /tech/, it's quiet there, let's see what was posted this week
>porn appears
Alright, this is breddy humorous
No.30317
>Created a new permanent ban on /leftypol/ for xxxx (#25667) with reason: embedded malware in .epub file
it didn't have malicious javascript you retard, that post was a joke
lol
No.30318
>>30317Jokes on you, I didn't bother checking, just reported.
No.30319
What happened to the thread that called out western activists for their petty bourgeois support of Palestine? It had the "Comrade Lenin cleans the world from filth" poster in the OP.
No.30320
>>30318most people don't even know epubs can have javascript, that's why I always make that joke
No.30321
>>30320Most people sure are damn retards. Can cbrs or cbzs have js?
No.30323
>>30297>untenableDon't say untenable when you mean annoying or something
>>30298Finally a good fucking post in this thread
>>30317I changed the ban
No.30325
>>30319It was deleted and I was banned because according to Sindikat it was a "garbage bait thread". Nothing about it was bait, I was responding in good faith throughout the entire thread.
I never knew that some leftypol jannies were such thin-skinned cowards. You couldn't even come up with an honest reason, Sindikat, so you had to make one up to cover for the fact that you disagreed with me.
No.30326
>>30325ok lemme go through this quick
Did you admit to using chatGPT?
No.30327
>>30326I didn't know leftypolacks were so illiterate that they are unable to parse the most obvious sarcasm. But yes, the whole article was written in ChatGPT from a single prompt I came up with when I was high on meth. My apologies.
No.30328
>>30327Alright no more questions
No.30330
>>30327Just out of morbid curiosity why can't you give a straight answer?
No.30331
>>30330I did not use ChatGPT.
No.30332
>>30331Aight, in that case I'll revert the ban
No.30333
>>30332don't do it, he is gaslighting you + it makes you look like a bitch
No.30334
>>30332I find it very hard to believe that you banned me and deleted my thread because I made a self-deprecating joke.
Regardless, thank you.
No.30335
>>30333Well too late it already happened
Also gargle my nuts
>>30334Wasn't me.
No.30336
>>30325I saved it because luckily it was open in another tab. Probably missing some replies, but I appreciate the analysis.
No.30339
>>30325It was absolute trash, dishonest, bait, overly long, and written in ChatGTP.
>>30332WTF
No.30343
i dont want to give you guys more work but can you do something about the naruto avatarfag, his attention whoring is tedious and clogs up threads with the same fucking pics
No.30346
>>30323I don't mean annoying though, if you slowly permanently ban all the good VPNs then we will be stuck with absolutely shit tier alternatives. The reason people keep trying to get certain VPNs unbanned is because they're part of the small pool of free and good quality VPNs. I would say there are only a few hundred good free VPN IPs, if you permanently ban several every time there's a raid then these will eventually deplete. At least if they're temp bans there is a sustainable level of their bans expiring somewhere.
No.30349
>>30346>if you slowly permanently ban all the good VPNs then we will be stuck with absolutely shit tier alternativesFair enough, I'll see about rejigging a bit
No.30382
Mods please remove the following posts for ban evasion, samefagging through VPN abuse and derailing bad-faith bait. It's the same anons malding about the mods removing pedoshit from /siberia/ and are now trying to keep whining in the alt-boards.
>>>/hobby/39155 >>>/hobby/39157 >>>/hobby/39159>>>/hobby/39160 >>>/hobby/39161 >>>/hobby/39162 No.30383
>>30382Found proof that all the pedo defensive spammers and concern trolls are from leftychin using VPN and Tor.
/i/res/1351.html#1821
No.30384
Accidentally put some threads on my watchlist, I forgot how to remove them, help?
No.30385
>>30382All those posts are replying to a post that brought up the topic first, you stupid fuck.
No.30386
Please link
>>>/hobby/752 into the OP of the new alternate chan thread
>>>/hobby/36917 thanks
No.30387
Delete
>>>/hobby/39169 For continuing to revive a bait derail while arguing in bad faith again, also for being a leftychinner concern trolling, see pic 1 in leftychin link
>>30383>>30385Nope. The initial "topic" was a 3 year old post stating that enacting torture on toys is usually a sign of psychopathic tendencies. Then you began malding about that and bringing up concern trolling nonsequiturs, that were addressed with sources. No actual argument was presented in return, only ad hominim and "no-u" assertions. Fuck off back to your shit hole.
No.30388
>>>/hobby/1516 Belongs in
>>>/AKM/ topic wise
No.30392
>>30387Posting a single study doesn't make you any less hysterical, sorry. Psychologists don't even formally use "psychopath" anymore.
Also,
>leftychinner concern trollingTake your fucking meds, holy shit. No wonder this place gets more dead by the day when it's filled with insistent annoying autists like this.
No.30394
>>30392>More projection baitOk psycho, keep telling yourself that.
>N-no I'm not a leftyhcin raider, I'm NOT<leftypol is dying guyzThanks for revealing your colors even more chinlet.
No.30395
>>30382>>30383I don't even know how you made all of these connections. The /hobby/ posts aren't talking about anything related to pedoshit. And the leftychan post is inquiry about the incest coomer, of which the leftychanners themselves are responding with a negative or confused answer anyway.
No.30398
>>30395>The /hobby/ posts aren't talking about anything related to pedoshit. See
>>>/hobby/39148<Oh, and those who watch hentai are pedophiles. Which is a blatant non-sequitur, yet was still addressed.
>the leftychan post is inquiry about the incest coomer It's on multiple topics, open pic 1, which includes "muh anti-pedo hysterics" which is pedo-apologia 101. Leftychanners are not an organized group of raiders but they all have the same shit takes and love to muddy the water. This entire hysteria about deletions began recently and was never a problem before, mods have deleted loli-shit and similar for years at this point and the only time someone complained was when /pol/ spammers or leftychinners were getting caught for doing this consensus cracking bullshit.
Frankly this entire shitshow is predicated on the fact that some underage faggot can't stop being butthurt because people aren't just quietly accepting godawfully garbage takes trying to strawman discussions about violence in fiction, and tying it to 2013 memes about boomers and video-games. Furthermore it's a complete derailment of the thread, regardless of your stance on the subject.
No.30403
>>30398>See >>>/hobby/39148This is sandwiched in-between two other reductio ad absurdems which also aren't really related. He's trying to make a point.
>It's on multiple topics, open pic 1Uhh… what pic 1? The post you linked in question is one sentence long and asking about the incest guy.
You made me ctrl + f "pedo" on that thread, and leftychan infact seems to be on the same page as you on this.
https://leftychan.org/i/res/1351.html#1416
>rest of the postDon't care. Just dunking on your schizotypic paranoia lol.
No.30406
>>30403>This is sandwiched in-between two other reductio ad absurdems <make a point No, it's a bad faith strawman and false equivalency.
>what pic 1Pic one in post /i/res/1351.html#1817
>schizotypic paranoia <same phrasing as the leftychinnerThe only dunking here is on you, since you're providing free PPH for the site.
No.30409
>>30406Bruh you're genuinely stupid. The guy's posts are only 30200 and 30202 which are deleted, the rest isn't his and are still up here.
>>30197>>30198 No.30410
>>30409 (samefag)
Wait these three last posts are both him and Pasq arguing.
Either way, the point stands which is that the other two I just quoted are not related.
No.30411
>>30409>the rest isn't his and are still up here. You do realize that he's abusing VPN right? This isn't a new thing.
>>30410And also there is no proof this was an argument with Pasq himself, Mods post with a trip such as
>>29755 No.30412
>>30411The other two posts appear in his screenshot because they were (at that time) the last ones at the bottom. They're also talking completely different things from his argument with Pasq.
>And also there is no proof this was an argument with Pasq himselfUmm… did you even look at the second pic that the leftychanner provided? Pasq deleted his own posts alongside that guy.
Mods can choose not to post with the capcode. If they were forced to do so everytime they post then we'd notice them around more on the main board (where they post anonymously like everyone else).
No.30413
>>30412>The other two posts appear in his screenshot because they were (at that time) the last ones at the bottom<cropping screenshots doesn't existLMAO
>Pasq deleted his own posts alongside that guy. Fair enough, my mistake.
>If they were forced to do so everytime they post then we'd notice them around more on the main board (where they post anonymously like everyone else). I wish they would be forced to, transparency and all that.
No.30414
>>30413I don't know why that guy took the screenshot like that, but it's not definitely not him because:
>these two are arguing about that pokemon porn>they both have different typing standards from the leftychanner and from themselves (one's all lowercase while the other doesn't use periods)>there is a 1 hour delay between the second, still-existing post and that of the leftychannerAnd most importantly
>the two are arguing for different positions on that pokemon porn. the second one is who was complaining about it while the first one is mocking himAnd of course the mods aren't stupid and can see the two posts' IPs.
No.30415
>>30414 Fair enough. Honestly I only posted
>>30382 because it's just off-topic. I don't mind other people's opinions, even if I disagree with them, but it's just a derailing eyesore that kills the thread when replies just use multiple fallacies in response to a good faith, sourced responses. Also leftychanners do spam this site a lot so at this point I'm tired of tolerating their shit, because it just gets the mods all up in everyone's business and nobody wants that.
No.30420
>>30387you know, just because you think youre being "objective" by posting some random study doesnt make you any less of a pissbaby over shit like violence in fucking fiction or kids breaking toys dude lmfao. get real
someone even brought up things that were just as ridiculous to claim and you had to take the bait and agree with all of them too, and then act offended that you got clowned on for being a puritan
No.30426
>>30382This is on point imo. Did I start this shit by coming to /meta/ 10 days ago and reporting the first person perspective image of a infant coded character getting raped? Since then there's been a lot of necrobumped threads by pedo defensive spammers imo also. Like I said on the first go around
>whatever porn wherever in general, although it's shitty that it's on the front page >anything infant coded has to go No.30433
>>30426>there's been a lot of necrobumped threads by pedo defensive spammersgod damn take your fucking pills schizo
every time i post on /meta/ i feel filthy because i get the feeling only the biggest autists like this idiot care enough to come here to complain in the first place
No.30434
>>30433One of a multitude of problems, yes
No.30435
You can recover a post by going back one page (arrow in upper left)…
No.30441
>>30433best you go and fuck yourself. there was ongoing discussion and I posted. Did you even look at the threads that were necrobumped? Or gems like this
>>30286 No.30462
>can post in bullshit /siberia/ threads
>banned from posting in political /leftypol/ threads
why you waste my time like this mods?
No.30465
The spam is out of control. the board is full of opinions I disagree with
No.30468
>>30465Nah. Every porn thread is getting bumped butever. Wonder if there's anything going on in the world at this moment that porky doesn't want us to think about.
No.30474
thank you jannies for unbanning me
No.30488
banned from posting in the Palestine thread over tor. How could this injustice exist?
No.30491
>>30489Node is banned again
No.30494
Can someone fucking remake the fit thread. The other is full.
Thanks.
No.30525
>>30524Just a bunch of bagholders. You don't need a conspiracy to get a contingent of people to superficially look as if they're irrational.
No.30528
Personally do not think that the “Self Improvment, Exercise and The Left” should have been moved to /Siberia/. It isn’t a joke thread, it’s a serious issue that holds back the left, the fact that so many people think of these things as “fascism” or “reactionary”
No.30533
We need a transparent Social Credit system like Communist China.
No.30535
>>30533Your social credit = how the jannie's hormone therapy is hitting in that moment.
No.30541
>>30535well, maybe if you weren't so transphobic the mood swings wouldn't be so severe. maybe if you were more supportive they would be depressed rather than angry
No.30544
>>30541See this is a fellow human, whatever side this is taking (doesn't matter)
It's something new, it demonstrates basic thinking
Not like the usual malfunctioning automatons.
If you act like a stereotypical /pol/yp you are very, very like to have severe mental problems and that's not a joke.
No.30555
why are reactionary incels allowed THREE threads on /Siberia/
I don't mind people venting but some of the stuff that gets posted in there is sketch as hell, mods need to be watching that closely before it festers into right wingers taking over part of the website
No.30556
>>30555Transphobes will be banned under Communist Leftypol Social Credit System
No.30562
>>30556Doxed to the Chekka*
No.30565
>>30555>bitch complaining about reactionary incelsOh do sod off, the mods already delete ACTUAL reactionary shit (and plenty of stuff that isn't) as is, stop provoking them with this lame concern trolling.
No.30570
why did the picture for >>>/siberia/499492 get nuked?
No.30575
Hey, is there any particular reason I got my post deleted (and got briefly banned and then unbanned) from the KFC thread for bringing up factory farming? The ban message said it was for /pol/ posting, which is clearly nonsense as those guys arent really champions of animal rights. And dont give me some shit about implied death thread or something, people make very explicit ones on this site all the fucking time.
From the mod log it seems the ban was given by pasquale, which brings me to the second issue: why is this guy even tolerated in a mod team? Almost every time I see post get unjustifiably deleted or someone gets ban for bogus reasons, this tard is behind it. He is a power-tripping mod stereotype, constantly taking out his inferiority complex on random posts he doesnt like, with complete disregard for site rules.
No.30579
>>30575>the ban was given by pasquale, which brings me to the second issue: why is this guy even tolerated in a mod team?I don't understand it either. All the other mods constantly shit talk him behind his back on matrix, and even sometimes publicly on this board. I don't think anyone in this community likes him but for some bizarre reason he feels the need to stick around.
No.30588
I was wrong and the mods were right
unconditional support for the moderation team
No.30590
Some janny gave me a 15 min ban over stating the fact he banned a Christian schizo in less than a minute while allowing a LITERAL ZIONIST troll to spew his racist rethoric (which still there for everyone to read), the absolute state of current leftypol
PS: Apparently it was this pasquale asshole from logs, why is he even in the mod team? He clearly only deletes shit he doesn't like, or that he personally feels offended to, while giving 0 fucks to rules
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/1762550.html#1763359 No.30591
>>30590At least you found the right thread to be an entitled Karen
bitch ass
No.30592
>>30590You’re wasting your breath. The mods are well aware of his behavior and they relish in letting him loose like a wild dog to remove all that triggers him. There’s an ever expanding list of topics he seems to have automated alerts for and scripts to ban for key words, and what’s worse is that he’s irrevocably convinced of his own righteousness so there’s no negotiation: you either agree with him on everything or suffer. Someone mentioned earlier that your best bet is to only post during the 4 hour period he’s not actively monitoring the computer and I wouldn’t be surprised if those become peak hours
No.30593
>>30592You have two options
Adapt your behavior
Or listen to this cretin
Nothing personal
No.30600
I have to ask, why being a mod if you are not going to take it at least a little seriously? You dont have to do this, so if you cant be bothered, just dont. I would assume that as a volunteer you care about fate of this website and community, and want to improve it, but all you are doing is making the experience worse for everyone involved.
No.30601
>>30600I make the experience worse for a certain, very specific subset. This can either be chalked up to acceptable losses or working as intended. Take your pick.
No.30607
>>30601Could you define that subset please?
No.30608
>>30607Absolutely. Right-wingers, regressives, atavists. But not only that, no. Some of them still run around. See, a second criteria is being obnoxious beyond what can be reasonably tolerated.
No.30613
>>30608>Right-wingers, regressives, atavistsI get the right-wing part, what exactly do the other two mean though?
No.30614
>>30613Oh pretty much the same thing
No.30616
>>30608And under which of those categories does defending China against western propaganda come in to play? Because of all the arbitrary things you can and censor for “Dengism” seems to be the top of the list
No.30617
>>30616woaw man
guessing I have serious beef with you. But it's not for that reason
No.30626
You don't need impulse control if all your impulses are perfect. I am a perfectly calibrated machine.
No.30633
what's the point of appealing bans if the same janny who gave the ban can dismiss the appeal?
No.30634
>>30633Now that's an interesting question.
No.30664
The worst thing about communists is that they're too sincere and serious to understand irony.
If I were living under Actually Existing Socialism, I'm pretty sure I'd be GULAG'd for publishing the communist equivalent of "a modest proposal" or something.
My soy leftcom friend with minor clout in the party would try impotently and limp-wristedly to defend me to no avail, and I'd be marched off to 15 years of hard labor.
Then 50 years later capitalist media vultures would use me as an example of le poor freedom loving intellectual repressed by the ebil comminist regime. Tfu.
No.30665
>>30664Yeah man, at this point I don't really deal with anyone having a "slip-up". It's all been pure psychos.
No.30666
Also it wasn't funny
here have this
https://www.marxists.org/archive/gorky-maxim/1924/lenin-the_man.htmlGorky getting all giddy about Lenin
No.30667
>>30664>their critique of communism is an entirely hypothetical scenario in which the party singles them out in particular for some imagined subversion where there immediately gulag'dits honestly p funny how many times i've heard this critique now. it literally just boils down too "what if in a scenario I just made up the commies attack me for being the main character". Shallow and idealistic
No.30668
>>30664>>30667the only problem is calling this communism - this already happens under capitalism all around the world and also happened under the ussr after degenerating into another bourgeois state
No.30670
>>30667Hypothetical? It's already happened. I got banned from a dozen "communist" fbi.gov servers for my vehement opposition to anime.
The bolsheviks went from a reading group to state power.
It's not hard to imagine fbi.gov mods attaining similar authority in the chaos of the revolution.
No.30671
>vehement opposition to anime
Alright, I interrupted what I was watching to laugh at this
No.30675
>>30670>i was banned from a fbi.gov serverboo fucking hoo
No.30676
oh man, I just found out it is not against the rules to impersonate mods. now this thread makes a little more sense
No.30677
>>30676What is a mod? On a spiritual level. We are all a little bit moderators.
No.30678
>>30677did you just call me a terminally online neet?
No.30680
This site is only good for talking about SЁX on /siberia/
No.30681
>>30680no, it sucks for that, all the replies are cück shit like "you should ask your partner". I need encouragement, I need to be told that men love when you disassemble all the appliances in their house to look for surveillance devices
No.30702
>>30682There hasn't been a split in like 3 years though
No.30707
i made some serious posts about the funny topic that everyone discusses to death daily here just as some guy started spamming shit calling the mods pedos so uh just in case theyre also using tor im a diff person
No.30709
I use TOR too and I am not the spammer.
No.30712
>>30709Whoa, I use tor AND I'm not the spammer too.
No.30716
>>30712Waow, never looked at it that way
You mean there are normal people here too?
No.30725
This is a metaphor for reactionary trash at large. They just cannot conceive of anything outside their own limited experience.
No.30728
If you are multitasking you are like a god to a rightoid
No.30730
I suggest we follow China's example with online games and limit leftypol lurking to 4 hours a day.
Upon first request of the day from a given IP address, a 4 hour timer should start, at the end of which the IP would be banned for 20 hours.
And it should be a ban on viewing pages as well as posing.
No.30760
Are there any posting activity stats available for leftypol
I want to pick the most opportune time to post bait.
No.30783
>>30760Check the home page…
No.30784
>>30783No daily / hourly graphs?
Guess I'll scrape em myself.
My bait will have to wait a week.
No.30785
>>30784>one week later*gets shot immediately*
No.30793
>>30760Generally you should assume any English (or Spanish) space is most active in the afternoon & evening of the timezones in the Americas (continent).
Check 4stats for a quick reference converted to your timezone, since the geography of the userbase is similar. As you can see, it's a smooth curve that peaks at 3-6 pm EST.
This rule applies to any space on the internet so along as you know where the majority of its users are. So for example if you wanna browse the Chinese internet at peak activity you aim for when it's ~4 pm in coastal China.
No.30814
>>30793Ok, now I need a similar graph but for moderator activity, so I can pick a time in the day with maximum user activity vs minimum mod activity.
No.30816
>>30814You are a bit funny I'll give you that
No.30823
>Maintenance Notice — by at 2024-02-19 (Mon) 13:11:39
>Tuesday 20 February 2024 Leftypol may temporarily go offline for maintenance
sounds like a reverse canary. blink twice if they got you, mods
No.30824
>>30823No! This can't be! I can't let the United States' government know my position on the LTV vs unequal exchange debate!!
No.30830
Why the heck is >>>/siberia/484403 anchored? There's no reason given and it's a legit thread even if some retards started arguing in it, it's literally what /siberia/ is for.
No.30831
>>30830What the OP claims isn't true. It was just one guy.
No.30832
>>30830BASED MODS FACTCHECKING, DEBOONKING AND CORRECTING THE RECORD
MODS = GODSanyone who disagrees with mod actions is a schizo cryptonazi reactionary spammer
No.30834
>>30832Just because I see the same post repeated (obv it's one guy) over this IP. I wouldn't normally give this any attention.
We've long left behind any question of disagreement.
Quantity has its own quality. We have a handful of extremely obsessed spammers. If you are tunneling through VPN/proxy, chances are you will pick up at some point a ban that is not "meant for you". It is really that bad. I don't get how this is possibly a hard concept to grasp for anyone. So I presume it must be bullshitters crying for attention. Trite, boring, I can't imagine what brought you to this point in your life. This is why we can't have nice things.
I am of course here not asking anyone to have a come to Jesus moment, just the most basic self-reflection would constitute progress for some people.
No.30836
>>30831I see. Well then just archive it in
>>>/siberia_archive/ at this point.
No.30837
Requesting threads >>>/hobby/26632 and >>>/hobby/15840 be archived
Requesting >>>/hobby/15521 and
>>>/hobby/17019 be moved to
>>>/draw/ and
>>>/hobby/1516 be moved to
>>>/AKM/ No.30844
>>>/leftypol/1770361
idk why this was anchored but you should read the op carefully before deciding what threads to kill
No.30846
Requesting >>>/siberia/506121 be moved and merged with
>>>/anime/3808 Also requesting
>>30837 be addressed, its been a few days.
No.30847
>>30846sufficiently old threads like the one in
>>30837 have to be moved carefully because they are from bunkerchan transcribed onto leftypol, and they often have their post formatting fucked up to hell if we move them - sometimes including loss of images or other undesirable effects. unless they are critical to preserve or migrate, its better to just leave them be, imho.
No.30852
Ignore that report, I reported myself by accident
also whats happening in the sino thread? Why the deletion?
No.30855
>>30852>also whats happening in the sino thread?mental illness. maybe one bystander caught in the crossfire. minor development pay no mind.
>Why the deletion?if you want to know why something got deleted, come here first.
No.30856
>>30855alright, good to know
No.30861
>>30859>that IP>that posthilarious
No.30867
Please delete my OP >>>/leftypol/1773798
And can mods in fact let users delete their own OPs? This is very inconvenient for both sides involved
No.30869
Please merge
>>>/hobby/39686 into the existing smoking thread
>>>/hobby/10326 No.30872
>>30868Whatever, can the moderators/devs change it so that people can delete their own OPs in the future, it's very inconvenient, especially since it means that accidental duplicate OPs have to be dealt with by the moderation team when its a waste of time for them.
No.30874
>>30861Explain what was in my post history and what i was banned for. I literally did nothing wrong and was banned for so long for no reason
No.30875
>>30874I didn't write "post history". I wrote "IP". Do those words look at all the same? I am very peculiar with my words.
No.30907
>>30867>>30872Since the thread has decent conversation going on I see no reason to delete it, sorry, I'm sure it will bump off the front page within a few days though.
No.30920
>>30875>I didn't write "post history". I wrote "IP". Oh I see, you were commenting on the aesthetics of the IP number. Was it a sexy number?
>Do those words look at all the same? Meaning is the same.
>I am very peculiarThat you are. Unless you meant
particular.
No.30921
>>30920MOD BLOWN THE FUCK OUT.
No.30922
>>30920>Meaning is the same.No it isn't
>>30920>>30921samefag
No.30923
>>30922>No it isn'tWhat did you mean then?
>samefagNope.
No.30924
>>30923I know what your IP is, you know what your IP is. The only mystery is why you think you have anything left to say to me. It's just trite and boring, doing the same spiel hundreds of times.
No.30925
>>30924he is pretending to be me. i am the one who said mod blown the fuck out and the one who complained after getting banned for triggering a mod by saying the IVF ruling by alabama GOP was based. I got banned for GOP posting i guess. Cant post about the GOP, even when they do based shit
No.30926
>>30925we arent samefagging. were all posting on the tor node because you banned us all
No.30927
>>30926And I'll fucking do it again
No.30928
>>30927yeah the bans never stop us. there is always proxies and tor
No.30929
>>30928You are real trooper. Such struggle. Fight the powah bro
No.30930
>>30928>give year long range ip bans for the pettiest of perceived infractions under the excuse of spam, with no chance of appeal>people invariably are forced to use tor to even so much as appeal bans, never mind hold non-Pasquale approved opinions<OMG LE SAMEFAG SPAMMER!!!!!!You reap what you sow
No.30931
>>30929The real troopers are the mods. they deal with my gore and scat and spam for hours on end when they push me to do that.
No.30932
>>30930>You reap what you sowThat's my script you mong
By all means keep doing the same thing over and over and over
No.30960
mmmm communist lessons from the mossad agent, bellisimo
No.30961
>>30960>checking logsrofl of course its the terminally online mod who has a hard on for this pathetic livestream stunt
theres class ways to do this but you, being a liberal, have an affinity for petit bourgeois demonstrations. its not like you guys read or rather watch video essays slightly more difficult than mark fisher lol
No.30962
>>30961>theres class ways to do thisoh yea youre one to talk about class, faggot lol
No.30963
>>30962>talking about class action<erm but what have YOU personally done?so fucking smart
youre the one banning people for 12 fucking hours because theyre correctly assessing this as irrelevant propaganda of the deed impotent garbage lmfaoooo
like sorry that i dont defend useless activity in itself external to ends as virtuous like 99% of pseuds do. theres proper ways to put pressure on governments, with real historical examples to look at, but that would require to build class connections instead of idiotically setting yourself on fire
No.30965
>>30964trying too hard to seem cool by posting that after still reading the post lmfao
if we all engage in mass revolutionary suicide jim jones style we will force the bourgeois powers to stop selling weapons to zionistss, any day now
No.30966
>>30963this has nothing to do with bushnell and is just you being annoying and childish af please leave
No.30978
>>30960The term has fallen out of vogue, but this is really the essence of "identity politics". Zero reference to anything real, just pure floating signifiers. All understanding must be mapped on to the "culture war", as expected from the mod who also wastes every day of his life managing the leftypol twitter account.
No.30980
>>30978I can't even tell what the fuck you're arguing about, can we please keep this comment for actual complaints not just vibes? Thanks
No.30981
>>30980But we all know you know what he means, don’t you. The question is whether you’ll continue to act like a catty high school bitch or own up to your intentions like an adult
No.30982
>>30978>>30981wow "floating signifiers" you read baudrillard and laclau too? amazign
spare me the cock and ball lecture and go screech somewhere else
but let me give you a lowdown of reality to you since you insist so much on being Captain Real McFaggot:
someone made an intense act of protest, reflecting the rage and frustration of millions over a genocide thats currently going on ←–
THIS IS REAL, THIS HAPPENED (
WOW!)
riots, terrorism, performative suicides… a voice for the voiceless, its all a raw gritty and uncomfortable reflection of the political reality we live in.
this act resonated with the public so much that the fucking PFLP and Hamas made their own statements in solidarity towards bushnell.
this is the reality you claim to speak highly of. would you like to know more?
No.30983
>>30982Yeah, this is typical brainlet rubbish about how any act must be defended no matter how stupid. No analysis whatsoever, only aesthetics and optics.
>>30980>not just vibesThe fucking gall.
>the fucking PFLP and Hamas made their own statements in solidarity towards bushnellAll this does is reveal how bourgeois your aims and means are.
I couldn't care less either way, but we now have every petty bourgeois liberal with a hammer and sickle next to their username going RIP to this moron.
No.30984
>>30983The current /leftypol/ staff position is in support and solidarity towards the Palestinian resistance against genocide perpetuated by the Zionist regime. I apologize if this is fucking news to you.
No.30985
>>30981No I genuinely don't know what you mean. I can't make sense of what people are complaining about. Except that someone is upset they were or are being banned for making fun on Aaron Bushnell, which you know what, yes, I don't think we should set ourselves on fire, but I can respect the guy's depth of feeling and his act has in fact served as a message for pro Palestine feeling. I don't think we should make fun of him even if you don't think it was useful activism.
No.30986
>>30984I guess we dropped the "critical" part of critical support now. I'm "pro-genocide" if I refuse to support stupid propaganda-of-the-deed acts in support of a side in an imperialist war, a side created by the other side decades ago to stop Palestinian communists that came back to bite them in the ass, even.
I thought only MLs backed currently existing powers (all of which are in fact aligned against communism) but it seems anarchists are getting their brains rotten in the same way too.
Just because the situation is so fucked up marxism's role becomes quite limited doesn't mean we need to start pretending every act of "praxis" (useless term) is "based" and "communist". Can't criticize the act because of Christian bullshit about the sanctity of death or whatever.
No.30987
>>30986Ok I don't give a fuck. People that are extremely critical tend to be just shit. You hate everyone, good for you. Do you want a prize? Anarchists and such I can relate to. Leftcoms etc. are just garbage.
No.30988
>>30986>>30987the socialism in one arm chair posters are insufferable fr
No.30989
btw we have of course completely left the issue of what position is correct, or it might be more precise to say we were never there. The issue is as always that you are irredeemably childish. "I want to post whatever I want, wherever I want, how many times I want". Then you throw a fit. etc. etc.
Discussions at a certain point are just over. If you had any engagement in the real world, in reality, you'd know.
Fuck that. Your issues are so self-evident. If you do an absolutely shit post, if you do a poo on the floor, no one gives a singular fuck. But if you do it over and over and over again, well, it's time to go.
And I just got banned on a forum, not to see how the other side lives but just because I wanted to see some more civilized behavior for a change. Just change it up a little.
Anyway, that is not the situation we are looking at here.
No.30994
>>30986>Can't criticize the act because of Christian bullshit about the sanctity of death or whatever.The only people bringing up Christianity were the ones trying to smear the guy as a Christian fundamentalist, which was shown to be false and was dubious at best to begin with.
No.31006
>>31000
>>still doesn't even apply to the rules
Sure it does.
<11) Posts should, overall, be conductive to an informed and productive discussion. /leftypol/ is not an academic journal, but it also should not be a cesspit of back and forth bickering and pointless insults. Users should attempt to argue for the point they are presenting in an honest and open way and should be receptive to information or arguments that do, in fact, challenge their views.
Those kinds of posts are just an attempt to derail by Phil Greaves tier labeling everything fascist/reactionary.
No.31027
>>>/anime/23352 is an isekai thread, and belongs in the Isekai thread
>>>/anime/373 Please Move It There,Thanks
No.31028
>>31027How to kill the side boards 101
No.31034
>>31026lol I see what you are saying but here's why I don't really care: There's a couple angles here but bottom line, I think it's funny to rile up these pond scum that clearly vastly overestimate themselves. This thread has never been different, at least as far back as the tripfag Sage's time. It was since forever ago mainly this type of idiotic screeching.
I am immovable to people of that caliber. Everyone meets a bigger fish at some point. It's just nature taking its natural course and evening entertainment for me.
No.31035
>>31028>K-kill sideboards Shut the fuck up faggot, you LIVE on /meta/ whining about "muh generals" and "muh merges" and whatever the fuck every time someone requests them. Stop consuming oxygen.
No.31053
>leftist politically incorrect
<do not call the dead soldier an idiot :'((((((((
No.31058
>>31053Yeah yea
we should rename it to
Left Politically Correct*
*Politically Correct here referring to the original idea of being "in line" with the offical or party line, not the later usage of reactionary dicks having fits over "censorships and so on ….
like some David Foster Wallace joke
No.31096
>>31066there has been low level /pol/ spam for the last few days, but they've been trying to slip by with fewer posts going unnoticed rather than their usual MO of large volumes of post to disrupt things. they've also been employing some use of chatGPT, so overall its still about as subtle as a shart in a library.
No.31098
Why have you deleted my ccru thread?
No.31101
Anyone else think outrage bait shouldn't be posted on the inc- I mean relationships thread on siberia?
No.31102
>>31101As long as its not openly misogynist its fine.
No.31115
>>30985>someone….banned for making fun on Aaron Bushnellfull support for this
No.31123
Why did I get a ban but not the dude promoting welfare for white people and genocide for everyone else?
Are the mods pro-liberal zionism, pro-white supremacy, or pro-black genocide?
No.31124
>>31123i'm pro you not posting on this website anymore
No.31126
>>31125i banned that guy for that post before you posted this so please shut the hell up
No.31127
Its worrisome that the last admin that got purged was steadfast about letting far right shills work their magic on this chan. We are only 300 strong we could be easily flooded with more than regular users are with just one 4chin thread.
No.31128
ik part of the onus is on the users too not take bit and this is less of a request or complaint and more of general meta question but are we getting raided or something? its seems like this past week or two theres been a noticeable uptick in .net and /pol/ style shitflinging. Especially in USApol and random bait threads that are all like "why dont left care about right wing culture issue".
No.31129
>>31127There's never been a purged admin. And certainly not anyone who was "steadfast", there was the space spat, then dollars, then the farce of a farce who self-purged, after a botched self-coup (hilarious, in hindsight). All self-defense.
>>31128>honey it's time for the worst meta discussion on the internet<please report No.31133
Can >>>/siberia/504725 be archived, it's at page 22 and it's a fun thread.
No.31141
what the fuck was that fedpost? was it glowies or was it some organic leninhat-tier schizo?
No.31143
Please move >>>/siberia/506434 to
>>>/hobby/ It's a /hobby/ topic and just sinking in /siberia/
No.31144
>>31141If we get the news about happened to him, please
No.31146
>>31144The news is that the vid is some online nazi group shitpost.
No.31149
turn off the stupid names
No.31152
After I have spent 6+ hours working on a custom hashing algorithm that I ended up throwing away anyway?
No
No.31154
Theo names are cool and based
No.31155
>>31152>6+ hours for random nameslol
No.31156
>>31149>>31152I wonder what my name going to be
No.31157
>>31152weren't the names already implemented from before
No.31158
>>31155The fun thing is, they aren't 'really' random.
Every time you post the backend hashes your IP and uses the result as a key to select a name from a table. As such a given IP will always have the same name (unless you specified one in the name field, in which case the whole process is skipped).
Originally to generate the key I broke up the ip address string in it's components, parsed them into integers then xor'ed them all together with some bitshifting to get a nice 16-bit value.
But that was stupid and it introduced a dependency in the instance configuration, so ended up picking a native php function instead lol
No.31159
>>31155He had to program them in manually.
No.31160
>>31157Not really. The other staff told me there had been a similar even a year or so ago, but the code and the original name list are lost.
The current configuration is permanent and triggers at every March 8
No.31161
>>31154How could they not be? Actually maybe I should use only joke names for tor users lol
No.31162
Uhum sorry to bother you guys but there is a nazi thread in /leftypol/, he uses a nazi flag and says stuff like this
>I believe Russia’s enemies are jews in the United States with imperial ambitions and this is their way to upend their power.
>Do you take anything seriously outside of furry porn or do you want to have a conversation?
>Will a self deprecating joke help? I had to use a calculator to find the password because I’m a nazi retard.
No.31163
I think he might be a nazi
No.31164
>>31163>>31162That's too polite now. Very disconcerting.
No.31166
>>31158>Every time you post the backend hashes your IP and uses the result as a key to select a name from a table. As such a given IP will always have the same namecongrats, you invented post IDs.
No.31167
Have another fit m8
The deterioration of your (mental) situation is very likely a result of your previous fit
but keep going, just keep going
Never question yourself
Drive off a cliff
No.31210
another day, another win.
No.31212
What timezone is used for the march 8th namelist thing?
No.31213
what's with the Glowing name prefixes for some posts?
No.31215
>>31213Tor posts. Another excellent and truly astounding feature of leftypol(dot)com.
No.31221
Please merge
>>>/anime/20306 into
>>>/anime/22783 as the latter is a better OP. Thanks
No.31224
>>31212 (me)
There's not a single place on the rock known as Earth that is still in the 8th of march right now. Is the namelist trigger and "de-trigger" even automatic?
No.31228
>>31213>>31215i was just going to comment on this once i realized it. might as well add post ids at this point (unironically)
No.31238
>>31228Mods, the names are fine and good, the Glowing prefix seems like a bad idea. What's the Very Good Reason for it's introduction?
No.31239
>>31238Compromise position
No.31242
>>31235NTA but how is this Incel? It's not supposed to be a year round thing and it does make it more annoying to post long term.
No.31243
>>31242its just a weekend thing. everything would go back to normal tomorrow
in the meantime, enjoy your temporary forced-fem experience, anon ~
No.31245
>>>/anime/3193 was necrobumped from literally the bottom of Catalog, please delete the post. The thread is redundant because the Otaku /jp/ thread exists and the ANIMETA thread exists. Please remove the necro bump and when the current language roulette ends (if it does) please move
>>>/roulette/2264 into
>>>/anime/ as a japanese language thread, rather than a vague link on the end of a dead thread nobody has used in 2 years and cares to read. Thanks
No.31255
>>31239>Compromise positioncompromise position on what issue?
>>31243The names are unironically something that could be kept in some way. There's nothing wrong with reminders of heroes from the past.
No.31256
>>31255On the horribleness of the Tor node.
It'll become more apparent with time now.
I intend to just wait instead of trying to intervene.
Anyway if you tell me how your political education is, I could explain it.
But I don't know what level to write at here. Like, first grade or high school.
No.31268
Bring back the cool names. They did change basicaly anything, but better reform then no revolution
No.31277
Move
>>>/roulette/2684 to either /dead/ or /siberia/, or delete it.
No.31279
>>31266as was said above, it's a compromise. tor users cannot be moderated in the same way as other users, and it has been our most prominent vector for spam and abuse like ban evasion and samefagging. some on the mod team favor axing it altogether for those reasons. i think it is better to keep it, and label it so that anons know when they are dealing with someone who got banned on their mobile ip and have come to shit up the tor node in retaliation.
No.31281
>>31279You do realize that bans only appply to IPs, not people?
No.31286
the 8moe tournament has ended, please move >>>/siberia/499980 into
>>>/siberia_archive/ thanks
No.31298
>>31281yeah what is your point
No.31301
>>31298Best guess, he's saying he's not actually banned (lol), on a technicality. It's all so petty and absurd.
No.31329
Now that posts from Tor are marked I don't see why we aren't getting 2ch-style IDs at this point. BaI already does it and their source code is free if you want to know how they implemented it.
>For privacy reasons, this identifier changes every 24 hours and is different in each thread.https://bienvenidoainternet.org/faq.html#id No.31337
>>31279> i think it is better to keep it, and label it so that anons know when they are dealing with someone who got banned on their mobile ip and have come to shit up the tor node in retaliation. Why are you characterizing people that use the tor node as bad faith? The glowing prefix has to go, it's a ridiculous compromise.
No.31339
>>31329 (same again)
>Now that posts from Tor are marked I don't see why we aren't getting 2ch-style IDs at this point.ffs guys. We're entering an era of increased surveillance and consequences in the west and you want to reduce anonymity? Communist party members in the UK are getting arrested for handing out pamphlets ffs.
No.31358
>>31339you know neural networks can already deanonymize quite effectively just by looking at how you type, right?
its always the most schizo who know the least about what theyre talking about lol
No.31368
>>31224The rest of staff (Misato) insisted to keep them on for a bit more
No.31371
>>31268The idea is to repeat the event for new celebrations
No.31372
>>31329That's a no a priori because it would be a pain to implement
No.31373
>>31224It's women's history MONTH, chvddie.
No.31377
A moderator banned me unjustly. I cited illicit drug use statistics, and they cited another metric that is completely separate from the one I cited, then called me illiterate and schizophrenic. They fail to understand that the source brings forth many metrics, but I was only citing illicit drug use by state.
In actuality, they are the one who is schizophrenic. They clearly made a mistake, or they are just a schizo looking for any reason to target me.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/drug-use-by-state This secondary source shows rates of illicit drug use by state, but its primary source also shows a metric that combines many factors of drug use like police funding, overdose deaths, etc. The moderator, or whoever disagreed with me and banned me, ignored the illicit drug use statistic that I cited and only referred to the metric that combined factors.
The weighting of these factors is subjective, while the illicit drug use rate that I cite is concrete.The moderator was clearly flustered, but I have no ill feelings. I just want to explain that they cite an entirely different, made up metric from the same source and use this to devalue the concrete statistic I cited.
No.31378
>>31377You have to be careful, the person you're arguing against or disagreeing with could be a mod. They browse the site while logged in so they can check everyone's post history when replying (a habit they brought over from reddit, I suppose). If you get on their bad side, you're fucked.
No.31379
>>31378I already know this. I just want the moderator to at least understand that the ban was fucked up, that they are wrong, and that I am right. They don't even have to unban me because I know I am right, as I have explained.
No.31383
Narcissistic injury lol
I know there is no such thing as a narcissistic episode
but the retard on the tor node is really meming hard at one.
Or is that just mania?
Jump out a window.
No.31389
>Arguing back is just going to fan the flames of the rage even more. Not only have you already threatened their sense of ego, you’re now disrespecting them and questioning their authority! Trying to reason with them isn’t going to be any more successful when you think of how deep the narcissistic scar is that you, perhaps completely inadvertently, injured. They probably aren’t capable of listening to reason and, given the manipulative nature of narcissists, they may even have manipulated you into a situation where they can present themselves as the injured victim, fully justified in their vengeful response.
>One option is to stick around and let them think they’re in the right, perhaps offering an apology to placate them. One client told me how, even as a little girl, she would apologise to her emotionally abusive, narcissistic mother—even when she knew she hadn’t done anything wrong. “I would say, ‘I’m sorry, mum’, even when she’d been horrible to me. An admission that I was in the wrong was the only thing that would calm her down.”
>Sticking around an abusive narcissist who has repeated episodes of narcissistic rage means staying in an abusive relationship. If you are in this type of cycle with a narcissist who doesn’t believe they need to change, your only option is to avoid them and their uncontrollable outbursts. If you need help and support, please seek out a suitably qualified therapist.
Do not go on xitter and fan the flames. Don't shitpost at rightoid twitterati. It will just make them worse. You are not helping.
But seriously, drive them to suicide.
No.31398
It's like that Gandhi quote: "First you destroy them in an argument" or whatever who gives a shit
Anyway
He is spamming Nikocado porn quite narcissistically
No.31401
No matter how hard you collapse, kick, scream and cry, you can never get the knowledge out of your head. You cannot unsee it.
No.31402
>>31401Why the fuck did the mods just let that guy spam? Just ban the node, you fucking idiots. Don't sit just sit there deleting it for hours. Holy fuck
No.31403
There is three types of people on the tor node:
Malevolent narcissists
Psychopaths/sociopaths
Paranoiacs
Tag yourself
No.31407
>>31402I literally came here rn to o7 the mods because I saw porn in the gaza thread but it was deleted before I could even report it. That's modding. Nothing wrong with making the tor node text only but keep the node ffs.
o7
No.31409
>>31372Do devs even enjoy programming anymore?
No.31410
>>31409In general yes, but I already have my hands full
No.31411
Btw here is an inedit preview: sometimes within the end of the month the site will temporarely go read only, as I have to mess around with the backend database.
We will post a more exact date on the website's news and on twitter when we figure out the date
No.31416
>>31415The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) does not list malignant narcissism as a diagnosis.
No.31417
>>31416Some people describe malignant narcissism as a form of psychopathy, which the DSM-5 also does not list. Psychopathy is an unofficial term for people with antisocial personality disorder.
As there is not a well-validated scale to measure malignant narcissism, its characteristics are not clearly defined. It may serve as a moral judgment rather than a diagnosis, especially in online abuse recovery and self-help spaces. Whether malignant narcissism is a real diagnosis remains controversial.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/malignant-narcissist No.31419
/ukraine/ thread locked?
No.31423
>>31420Is there some connection between the spamming of the gaza thread with porn and now the ukraine thread with gore? I've said it many times itt that just switching the tor node to text only would solve most of it
No.31442
>>31438Informing yourself is not a bad thing in any case
No.31463
Anyway, I never had a chat with an out-and-proud psychopath. What's up otherwise?
No.31470
Of course a psychotic narcissist would be anti-psychology
You know you are so predictable
No.31471
This isn't a narcissistic injury.
This is a stake right into your brain.
Sic semper psychotics or whatever lol
No.31496
Would have been a better post if I wrote
"but you can't, I already castrated you"
Eh I don't give a fuck lol. Point is, it's hilarious.
Did I do that deliberately or by accident? You have no idea.
No.31507
To whoever is doing this amazing job of deleting all this retarded gore spam, i salute you. You are a hero of the people. Marx would be proud
No.31511
I know I'm an obnoxious schizo but i don' even know what i was banned for
No.31512
Leftypol /int/ would be nice for different language discussion. You cant translate everything to english.
No.31516
>>31512See the current
>>>/roulette/ topic
No.31517
The guy spamming gore in the threads is back again
No.31518
Oi, can you kill the gorespammer FFS?
No.31535
>>31534you seem incredibly autistic
No.31553
>>315358) Creating a new thread for a topic with an existing 'general' thread (e.g. creating threads about COVID-19 news, any e-celebrities, or USA mainstream politics) will be deleted or merged and will usually result in a short ban. Creating a redundant thread will be treated the same. Search the Catalog view search to find existing threads.
Why do you think he is austistic, why should there be 4 threads about nutty putty?
No.31558
>>31553because its funny :)
>>31540anything i dont like isnt organic joking around, its actually malicious samefagging shitposting. theyre out to get me i swear
No.31581
Let's be real, Mr Bingus, not a lot of people have been ownzoned so hard on the internet, they went on a 5 day almost uninterrupted tantrum
You are distinguished in that
No.31586
>>>/leftypol/23722
Wouldn't this solve most of the supposed issues around abuse of the tor node?
No.31588
Incredible how long the "Socialist Copyright" troll thread has been going without getting yeeted.
No.31597
>>31552>>31558>I'm totally not a samefag! <projection about sex and schizophreniaOk retard lol.
No.31599
>>31597>everyone i dont like is le samefag>picking two completely different posts to make a point about itlol this sticky is always filled with the 'funniest' people on leftypol
No.31600
>>31599>Tor faggot is still lurking this thread >implicitly admits to samefagging in the same post that they poorly attempt to deny samefagging with lazy /pol/-tier sardonics.Ok retard
No.31601
>Ukraine thread cleared (for now)
Thanks Misato!
No.31606
Please merge
>>>/hobby/18223 into the current Star Wars Thread
>>>/hobby/15143 since that's where the topic belongs and its literally at the bottom of catalog for no reason. Thanks.
No.31607
If possible, can
>>>/hobby/18273 be merged into the /x/ thread
>>>/hobby/36720 It's a bit of a tough ask given how old the thread is, but it would be a shame for it to just get bumped off Catalog.
No.31608
>>>/hobby/2221 Mods were planning on putting this thread in >>>/alt_archive/ but they forgot, so I'm just bringing it up to your attention. Also on the subject of archiving; Please archive the following threads as they already reached bump limit AND have the next threads up
>>>/hobby/25977 and >>>/hobby/29827 Fashion thread #2 and #3 >>>hobby/16350 EuroFoot thread is Full and no longer relevant>>>/hobby/15840 and >>>/hobby/26632 for /fit/>>>/hobby/1857 and
>>>/hobby/2737 for Star Trek and Star Wars
>>>/hobby/551 for Furry
>>>/hobby/24481 for Film
>>>/hobby/752 for Alt-Chans
>>>/hobby/15233 for /co/
>>>/hobby/7136 for Permaculture
No.31610
>>>/hobby/22309 is redundant and near the bottom of Catalog. Please merge into the other poetry thread
>>>/hobby/1740 Thanks
No.31614
>>31606>>31607>>31608>>31610thx for reminding/requesting on archiving some threads (more ppl should do that)
ill get around to this soon
No.31618
Accidental duplicates mods >>>/draw/4312 and >>>/draw/4316/
No.31663
>>31662This thread exists specifically to make you mad
No.31668
Also as an aside
Afaik I am the only one being open about how I think messing with abusive assholes is funny. I do that shit for sport, yep.
If there is someone else, you'd know more than me. Not bloody likely, now is it?
No.31674
>>31662 (me)
Pointing out for clarity (even if it's obvious) - I wrote this post,
>>31662, and none of the posts in between.
No.31675
>>31674Ok, what do you mean "mods" plural.
Use your words, speak.
No.31688
>>31616lol do you wanna be part of the staff at some point
you do a better job at catching up with this stuff than most of us
No.31690
>>31689It's a legitimate question. Two mods were named "me" and one other. There is no indication this other mod even takes any notice of whatever is going on here.
Anyway at a certain point idiocy and maliciousness become indistinguishable.
You will be treated as having reached this indistinguishable state.
Have fun.
No.31698
>>31688 I try :)
>do you wanna be part of the staff at some point That's an interesting proposition! I admit my experience in being a moderator is small and I'm not sure how often I'd be available given my work hours, but I might do it in the future.
Be aware I have never been on the Matrix, so I'll let you know there, to avoid any pretenders or whatnot.
No.31729
Many thanks for unbanning me! I was drunk and depressed, when I posted my previous post.
No.31734
>it's full of hateful edgy uberfaggots that desperately want WWIII
WW3 implies a great blow or end to imperialism, vice-versa. You are the conservative. You are the fascist. You are the liberal. These are all the same things. You are the imperialist. You desperately want to conserve the status quo as you fail to realize what changing it implies.
>pray for the day fascists take over their country,
The "fascists" already rule.
>generally just revel in their utter hatred for the proletariat and the socialist movement?
Post examples of this. This is nothing but heresay unless you prove it.
No.31735
>>31734at least bordiga had the decency of not falling for third-worldist drivel. YOU are the liberal (too)
No.31738
nazi flag is spaming porn threads without hidden then
No.31749
Could >>>/siberia/514925 be moved to and merged with
>>>/hobby/37903 Since it's on Page 17 and clearly run its course on /siberia/ it would be best to put it in the main, current /strek/ thread. Thanks
No.31846
why the theme change?
No.31851
>>>/AKM/ has literally 6 different threads about guerilla, it's getting out of hand, please merge them together mods.
>inb4 not the exact same topicsCorrect, however they're all about the same idea - guerilla warfare/tactics and all of the threads are slow and abstracted.
>>>/AKM/1952>>>/AKM/3972 >>>/AKM/4531 >>>/AKM/4670 >>>/AKM/2313 >>>/AKM/132 No.31854
Probably too old or something but
>>>/hobby/21655 belongs in
>>>/music/ >>>/hobby/20544 >>>/hobby/17154 >>>/hobby/17986 Are all old threads asking about finding a hobby. Since (until someone necrobumped #17154) all three of these threads were on pages 33-35 of Catalog - the very bottom - then I'd encourage these threads be merged, since clearly there isn't enough interest for the topic of finding a hobby.
No.31857
>>31843>>31852You should probably link those threads instead of screenshotting them, anon.
>>31846Just a silly little April Fool's gag.
>>31850Idk I think its an interesting topic/OP
>>31851Some of these can be merged together, but not all of them. I merged the ones I found fitting.
>>31854The music prod thread cant be moved to
>>>/music/ bc its too old and it would end up being deleted.
As for the other threads, I think theyre fine to leave them be.
>>31856I personally think this is very low priority and not that big of a deal but if you insist, I'll just delete the post.
No.31859
>>31857Good Morning Misato!
>I think its an interesting topic Honestly I don't disagree with the TOPIC, it's the OP and how it presents the topic that makes me wary.
>music prod thread cant be moved to >>>/music/ bc its too old and it would end up being deleted. I expected that honestly
>As for the other threads I think theyre fine to leave them be Ok, I just thought it would be a good idea to bring up.
>this is very low priority and not that big of a deal I'm gonna be honest, it's better to kill bait like this right away, before someone decides to engage it and provoke another pointless, derail that the mods would have to clean up all over again, I've seen it too many times.
Thanks for your help, Ja Ne!
No.31860
>>>/leftypol/1810884
the archive.ph links aren't dead, I've opened all of them up so the strikethrough text ought to be undone if possible, or at least the text saying the links are dead.
No.31861
>>31860oh ok. takes a while to load on my end for some reason.
No.31862
>>31861I had that issue a while back, sometimes it's a browser or DNS issue, or cloudflare decides to not play nice with the system.
No.31864
The Evangelion and mech threads are both decently active, but the thread comparing Gunbuster to Evangelion hasn't had a post in half a year and is steadily sinking. It has some really good discussions and effort-posts but it's a slow topic.
I think it would be a good idea to move
>>>/anime/21588 to the mech thread
>>>/anime/845 which is broader and Gunbuster is talked about in the mech thread anyway.
As a side note can the term "mecha" be added to the mech thread OP? Thanks!
No.31867
>>31864Do you just constantly check the catalog in your free time to alert the jannies about whatever triggers your autism? Incredible.
No.31869
>>31867>Being butthurt about things you don't care about because someone actually cares about not letting the alt-boards turn into a dumpster-fire. I don't need to check catalog, because I'm not an ADHD spaz that forgets something is there because I haven't looked at it for 6 months. I noticed the thread was drifting down and has had little response since it died down and decided that since the broader topic of mecha was more active, it would be a good idea to merge them, that's it. If anyone appears to be triggered, its you.
No.31876
>>31874>>31875There's been no mod activity for over 13 hours according to the logs.
No.31879
>>>/hobby/12105 Should have budYenovka rather than Budenovka since it's a phoneticization of Будёновка
Please add Будёновка and Budenovka to the OP of this thread.
Also since it's already at Page 19 without much additional content, please merge >>>/siberia/516710 into the afore-mentioned Hobby thread
No.31889
>>31883Nta but what about
>>31879 ?
No.31890
>>31888>888 >if you're going to criticize a work, you actually debate its merits, it's what sets leftypol apart from /pol/ Based trips
No.31892
rescue the piracy thread and bring it home to /tech/ >>>/siberia/437227
No.31894
this literal namefag >>>/meta/31893 just parades around the board necrobumping threads and making shitposts everywhere like
>meds
>this board is dead
>who cares
why not just ban them?
No.31895
Mods can you fix
>>>/alt_archive/4965 All the text is fucked up for most of the thread and it's unreadable. I'm posting this here instead of
>>>/tech/ because that board never gets responses. Use
>>>/hobby/1857 as the reference in fixing the text please.
This also applies to several other threads in /alt_archive/ such as the film thread, Fashion Thread, Furry thread, and others listed below.
>>>/alt_archive/613>>>/alt_archive/6025>>>/alt_archive/1 >>>/alt_archive/1226 >>>/alt_archive/5401 >>>/alt_archive/3524 >>>/alt_archive/3041Some of these threads may not be my interest but deserve to be archived properly and so fixed. Thanks.
No.31896
Requesting a fix on one of my old effortposts
>>>/hobby/18737 The link
http://jalopnik.com/5903819/whos-left-in-the-old-folks-home-now-that-the-lada-rivas-gone was cut out for some reason
Section
>[4] whos-left-in-the-old-folks-home-now-that-the-lada-rivas-gone No.31897
>>31879>doneThanks for that Misato!
No.31903
>>31895Devs are on the case.
>>31896Fixing it gives me a flood detection error :(
No.31905
>>31903>Devs are on the case. NIcu
>Fixing it gives me a flood detection error :(Ah, darn. Oh well, it's not too hard to find the article again
No.31909
cp on aisle sib
No.31910
>>31909one of the many reasons why imageboards are banned in china, this site included.
No.31912
>>31910Can't the chinese just use a VPN to access ths site though? Is not that hard right?
No.31914
>>31910>one of the many reasons why imageboards are banned in chinaThere is (Or at least was) a confirmed anon from China that said that Leftypol wasn't banned there.
No.31915
>>31912the government can request data of the users or shut down the vpns, it's all about not making the outer internet hegemonic or useful. you're not going to use something that is useless, right? curiosity is all that remains, but just that.
even Tor they can't block because of bridges(but it's slow as fuck, which is why vpn would be better to use).
>>31914I remember him, he didn't say that, he said he was using vpn to access this site
there are many sites with servers inside china that check if a site is blocked or not, check 'em. or buy some airplane tickets idk…
I'm obviously not going to state what country I live, as it would be a very dumb thing for a Tor user to do.
No.31918
>people necrobumping irrelevant nothing threads. a lot.
>new namefags shitposting in _every_ thread
It's diluting the quality of the board.
No.31921
>>31920>Your ban ID is 27608.Still banned, is there a blanket ban on the tor node?
No.31922
>>31921>>31920I banned it because someone was spamming the tor node with repeated posts, will unban now.
No.31924
>>31920>>31918It definitely seems like a marked increase in spam, derail, CSAM, etc since Oct 7.This sort of thing happens whenever there's a major world event with a political angle. This time it's sustained more long term than usual. Probably not specifically targeting this site individually, just botting anywhere that has political discussion.
No.31925
People are spamming in /USA/ in leftypol with green text. Is a glowieanon
No.31928
>>31925Spammer is fucking all node users. Is it possible to pre approve tor posts temporarily, while they're active?
No.31929
>>31928do you realize how much work that would be?
here's an idea: run a counter on how many posts have been made from tor in the last idk 10 minutes and if it exceeds some threshold x% of the posts on the site, activate a variable so that if anybody reports a recent tor post with "spam" in the report field, it's automatically hidden by default for users, until mods can come review later
No.31930
>>31929>>31929>do you realize how much work that would be?It doesn't seem like that much work tbh. The homepage says 88 pph, a fraction of that is tor posts. Put all tor posts in a queue to be pre approved until the spammer gets bored.
No.31938
that tor spammer-terrorist is holding us hostage! someone stop that maniac! I am literally going insane AAAAAAAA
No.31943
>>31938You're only now going insane lol
You must be very slow on the draw
No.31954
I like how all the threads actually pertaining to the main board get eclipsed by the dozen generals that are more of off-topic chatting than actual discussion.
No.31957
>>31939lots of websites use basic metrics to detect if there's unusual activity, especially spam.
No.31960
>>31958>>31959This is literally the soyjak spam but without the actual shitty images
No.31962
>wonders why people aren't engaging with ideas and just shitposting
>allows shittiest of bait posts
>>>/leftypol/1820769
No.31965
Please add FALLOUT to the OP of
>>>/hobby/41241 otherwise it doesn't show up in catalog search.
No.32051
>>31965done
>>31967there u go ~
No.32052
>(Query too broad.)
Please increase the limit when searching for posts…
No.32054
Oh gods=mods, we request your assistance
No.32055
there's been a lot of distracting shitposts in the last week that haven't been deleted. reporting does nothing. Can we just nuke shit like this from serious threads? it's not even entertaining.
>>>/leftypol/1821929>>>/leftypol/1821944 No.32057
>>31924 same
>It definitely seems like a marked increase in spam, derail, CSAM, etc since Oct 7.For sure. Do mods officially acknowledge this? The amount of low effort, one sentence derail posts is fucked.
No.32059
>>32057 (You)
shit like this, whatever it is
>>>/leftypol/1821260 No.32064
>>32062well deserved ban actually. two wrongs dont make a right
No.32066
>>>/hobby/41281 belongs in the existing Star Trek thread
>>>/hobby/37903 please merge
No.32068
>>32067Cope and seethe faggot.
No.32070
>>32067literally almost every other website on the internet either allows or pushes zionism, why don't you go to those places instead?
why do you need the need to gentrify and colonize everywhere you go?
No.32073
>>32067The most basic communist positions are foreign to leftypol, it's only what you can expect.
No.32077
why tf are there nazis openly posting at all, is there a reason they haven't been banned on site and if the mod won't ban them can we at least declare open season on harassing them?
No.32078
>>32062your just a lib dont flatter urself
No.32079
Why did you ban >>1822898 ?
I didn't read his entire post, but I saw nothing harmful. Weird.
No.32081
>>32080The OP of the thread on immigration
No.32138
>>>/anime/24018 is bad-faith liberalism in motion. Even the OP wasn't so disingenuous. The Tor anon they responded to indicated no prejudice towards trans people and indeed, argued that trans people being exploited for political pandering purposes is literally a facet of capitalism. The fact that they constantly get word-filtered with 'chinlet' indicates that they're clearly someone from another site, possibly 4chan or reddit,
or even leftychan which have many toxic users. Their constant accusations of other posts being /pol/ is also suspicious as hell, it's almost like a chatbot repeating the same Permanent Token phrases repeatedly.
No.32139
>>32138that whole thread is a shitshow tbh
No.32140
>>32139Despite OP's rather partisan start, the thread has some actually good discussion, and its a topic that can be discussed, but the anon I responded to is just toxic. OP at least actually tried to make legitimate arguments, this obvious new-anon is either baiting, or a lib-tourist making wild accusations. At no point have I attacked or belittled trans people. I only point out that screaming at mostly a-political people about such a niche fetish is going to create a Streisand Effect, where people reject what they're told out of spite. polite sage for offtopic
No.32142
>>32140like others pointed out its just armchair psychoanalyzing and culture war shit. i know its a board about media but that thread is pure moralfagging and a libshit attitude towards """critical consumption of porn""" or whatever the fuck some of the posters were trying to get at, like transphobia happens because a laughably small group of people are masturbating the wrong way
No.32143
Approve my ban appeal already
p.s. the field for explaining yourself is too short for any meaningful explanation or expression of contrition
No.32146
>>32145what do they get from killing a few old crusty shitty threads
No.32147
>>32146They think they're triggering us or something, IDK. /pol/ really is stuck in 2021
No.32148
>>31953it keeps happening. why do we gotta be stuck with so many braindead assholes
No.32149
Please archive >>>/siberia/514904 since its literally at page 36
No.32180
>>>/anime/24044 is a fun thread but it hasn't had many replies since the morning, and it is technically redundant. Please merge into the main Dragon ball thread
>>>/anime/2912 Thank you.
No.32188
Are the ukraine threads not being archived anymore? Please archive the Ukraine threads
For example >>>/leftypol/1623527 was an October 2023 thread and it's neither in
>>>/leftypol/ nor
>>>/leftypol_archive/ No.32212
i wonder why my post where i was agreeing with other two posters complaining about the obsession with theory but without actually engaging with it and apologizing because i thought they were making a different point at first got deleted from the isg thread. did tor posts get mass deleted during that hour?
No.32215
I know this is quite minor, but can you make it a little less obvious that someone's using TOR? I understand why the differentiation is needed, but I feel like hovering on someones name for example to indicate a post is from TOR or just a smaller text somewhere indicating it was would probably be better than explicitly naming TOR users "Glownonymous" or whatever else.
No.32216
>>32215Unlikely at this stage. Also this post made me remember to go through Tor.
No.32219
Mods, please
No.32220
>>32215>groveling in front of these retardslol
They are incompetent, don't even bother.
No.32221
>>32065It's been a week mods, can you please address this?
No.32222
perhaps all the posts about the idiot that set himself on fire should be moved to the USA general, or it's own thread
No.32223
>>32222>2222 Quads confirm
No.32229
>>>/leftypol/1829729 to siberia
No.32231
>>32215Pretty sure you can just, you know,
manually change the name field to "Anonymous" like anything else.
No.32233
>>32232It would appear that you cannot.
No.32235
really I want to hear you admit (in public) why you stopped banning this persona which you hate with every fiber of your being. i've never hated you people btw. you're cute. you're like when little kitty cats jump around and attack shadows
No.32236
>>32235Who even are you and why are you doing a soliloquy?
No.32238
>>>/AKM/4758 is redundant, please merge into
>>>/AKM/38 if possible, thanks.
No.32295
>>32235For me personally I just have actual shit going on in my life. Hate is of course way too strong a word. I am disgusted by people and you barely register.
No.32313
>>29736How come jannoids aren't doing shit about zionists, queerphobes, trumptards and other fascist scum spewing their hateful garbage here? I thought this was a left wing board? Might just become discount 4chvdcels at this point
No.32315
>>32313Use report function
No.32316
>>32315NTA
I used the report thing a lot, but i never know if it gets any results
No.32317
>>29736Can /LGBT/ please be its own board instead of being reduced to an obscure thread in siberia? It's pathetic how 4chvds actually gives queerfolk more representation in this regard
No.32318
>>32315I used against a zionist troll on siberia yesterday
A few days ago I used against a troll who called queerfolk bourgeois decadence who should be forcefully put into camps
Jannies didn't do shit about either
No.32319
>>32317Man that is not happening bruv, they don't have the money to do it. Every board costs lots of money to be maintained, and adding more will just add into the costs.
No.32320
>>32317assuming this isn't bait: unless you can demonstrate it'd be fast enough to be a viable board (for example because a lot of people want to leave 4/lgbt/ or because another site is collapsing and a bunch of people would come here if you made a replacement) this is a horrible idea. basically every new board has fallen flat on its ass. there's never a plan to actually build a viable board out of it - just because you build it doesn't mean anyone will come - and the end result is that this site is /leftypol/, /siberia/, /meta/, and dead-dead-dead.
making a specific board could be actively harmful: because there's a specific board, you'll find that any lgbt topics on the boards people actually use will be moved to the dead /lgbt/ board to wither and die because that's now where they "belong".
No.32341
>>32317>hey can you kill this general thread by segregating discussion?please don't.
No.32342
>>32313>Might just become discount 4chvdcels at this pointwow i wonder where the site name comes from??/?
No.32345
>>32342It was called bunkerchan bf tho
No.32347
>>32346Yeah but the board name was bunkerchan not leftypol
No.32354
>>32317>>32313>Literal "So much for the tolerant left" rhetoric and lobbying for imitating 4chin This feels like a /pol/ troll post, or maybe leftych*n is false-reporting
again.
The LGBT thread is a General, there have been 11. This has been stated before, but an entire board for this is pointless, for the same reason we don't have individual boards for books, comics, movies etc, and have them lumped under /hobby/. A board like that is
A) Asking for idpol garbage and liberals raids
B) Literal /pol/ bait. I for one enjoy having a site where 90% of the users aren't atrocious /pol/fags
Also /lgbt/ is one of the most toxic boards on the internetz and is basically gay /b/. We already have /siberia/ and outside of the General I mentioned there is nothing stopping people from making individual random topics. Such as
>>32239
>Inb4 muh red fash or class reductionist or red-brown or le tankies!This concern tolling about "muh nazis and chinlets" reeks of reddit snowflake behaviour - we don't hide and run-away from /pol/shitters, we engage and destroy their arguments. That's why mods will allow such threads to stay up for a while, to let the local user-base tear it apart before anchoring it, in part because pic rel. Why? Because we're not sensitive babies that need to be coddled by the mods 24/7. Don't wanna engage bait? Hiding and ignoring does a whole lot more than complaining, since a response is literally what is wanted with those threads.
No.32356
>>32313>trumptardsAre you the the one that made that thread complaining about 'le trump supporters' and then provided little evidence about it? I'd wager the same for the other accusations.
>>32318>a zionist troll on siberia<Wow a shitpost on si/b/eria is a shitpost! It's lefty POL as in Leftist Politically INCORRECT. Stop trying to make this place an echo-chamber. We're not a hug-box, we're an anonymous, image-posting adult discussion forum that is leftist but with the caveat of permitting other people, so long as they follow the already strict rules.
No.32360
>>32354more liberals raiding the site would actually be good, as a group they have the highest possibility for conversion into regular posters at which point - even without coherent ideological education or such - the simple mechanics of acclimatising to a site's culture will drag them towards the same positions as the median leftypol poster. (i.e. "left") the real problem with an /lgbt/ board is not that it would attract raids, but that it would attract nobody while harming the line of discussion it was originally intended to harm.
also: while i'm not opposed to leaving bait up for a little while so that people can counter it, the idea thats that /pol/ can actually be destroyed by argument, that not wanting the political equivalent of spam is "running away" or "snowflake behaviour", or that moderators maintaining the board's quality are "coddling" the userbase reflect an underlying ideology that is unhelpful and at odds with empirical experience.
furthermore there's a borderline-contradiction between your image and your final line: hide and engage bait because they only want engagement, but engage bait because to fail to do so gives the impression the ideas are accepted.
>>32356the idea that "pol" should be considered an acronym for "politically incorrect" and not just "politics" is one of the dumber ones out there. it's an artefact title based on a retarded stock phrase.
(and i say this as someone broadly supportive of letting people with contentious foreign policy views argue. i would say that the current opinion of the site is positive to letting nazis post so they can be argued with, positive about letting capitalists/ancaps/etc post so that they can be argued with, but more afraid of letting pro-NATO/West foreign policy types post under the same terms.)
No.32362
>>32231>>32232You can change the name to literraly
anything else except "Anonymous"
No.32363
>>32319Nay. The issue is manpower
No.32366
>>32356lol lmao
Tell your handlers to rework the whole bit from the ground up.
No.32367
>>32360> the idea thats that /pol/ can actually be destroyed by argument, that not wanting the political equivalent of spam is "running away" or "snowflake behaviour", or that moderators maintaining the board's quality are "coddling" the userbase reflect an underlying ideology that is unhelpful and at odds with empirical experience.The underlying assumption is liberalism and working backwards from your conclusion. "They may not play fair but we can give them a chance". It is liberalism, plain and simple. You don't discuss with nazis you destroy them.
No.32371
>>32366The fuck are you talking about?
>>32364Glad to make you laugh m8, cheers! Good luck with fixing the archived threads BTW.
No.32373
Sorry this kinda became long even after editing. Sage for partial offtopic
>>32360 >more liberals raiding the site would actually be good I've said this too many times over the years. No they wouldn't. When reddit kicked its radical liberals out and Chapo came to us, the board was flooded by liberals with subversive takes, sounding leftist but pushing liberalism while attacking any opposition with "muh red brown/tankie/class-reductionist". For months we had awful threads gaslighting users and making the site an infighting shitshow. They're far LESS likely to change or acclimate 'cause liberalism is a subversive fascism and the enemy of leftism, meant to infiltrate and destroy from within, not by direct confrontation. A 5th Column if you will, and such a 5th Column is far more dangerous to the left than easily identifiable fascists intruding here.
>moderators maintaining the board's quality are "coddling" the userbase reflect an underlying ideology that is unhelpful and at odds with empirical experience. See the video in
>>32356 The userbase gives bad takes a retort and made these people leave, without the need for mods to ban excessively and rightly so. Simultaneously it allows people to actually have debates and discuss subjects with opponents while also learning to not get offended about the rants of an anonymous person on an obscure site, which is helpful in making a more coherent and nuanced understanding of socialism and a more hardened person; You need to know it well enough to actually be able to justify it in debate against people that hate it, 'cause these same arguments are what we must use to justify it to the proletarians who are not yet class conscious. It's why I made the /edu/ debunk thread too, so as to coherently address common myths and misconceptions.
Also privately I have fun tearing apart Nazi myths and lies. The mods have enough on their plates as is, and dealing with ACTUAL spam of CP and gore and soy, and addressing blatant rubbish is what they should do. We're an anonymous political imageboard, if a person can't handle some mean words and opposition, then this is the wrong place for that.
And while NTA but I'll address the following too:
>the idea that "pol" should be considered an acronym for "politically incorrect" and not just "politics" is one of the dumber ones It's literally the name's origin, assigned to what Moot wanted to make as a containment board for politics, still following 4chan's idea of freezepeech. It was parody of the hot buzzword of the time; Politically Correct, ergo Politically INCorrect. The beginnings of leftypol came from /pol/ boards as we got tired of under-age posters raiding threads about communism, thus Old BO made /leftypol/ as the leftist alternative, and the rest is history (well there's some other stuff with bunkerchan, but you get my gist).
>more afraid of letting pro-NATO/West foreign policy types post under the same terms. Not afraid, it's just tedious and annoying, 'cause you can't ignore literal Glowies or they'll start Consensus Cracking or use other COINTEL methods, yet taking apart their arguments is an exercise in repetition that gets tiresome (which is another COINTEL tactic - to grind down subversive groups by spamming bad faith takes until they grow tired and unmotivated, allowing them the chance to infiltrate and post diversionary crap.
With /pol/ you can either engage and have fun pissing them off while educating everyone ITT, OR hide and ignore, starving them for attention and forcing them to try harder, leading to breaking the rules and getting banned. /pol/fags also change tactics, adapted and pushed new areas that force users to discuss and understand their ideology and its history. What use is it to be a "socialist" when some fag like Ben Shapiro can "tear socialism apart with facts and logic"? Every one of his political debates have been retarded 'cause these self-proclaimed 'socialists' that opposed him understood it no better than he did, and had no response, despite half of leftypol being able to give his 'questions' proper retorts that would likely change viewers' minds; hell I've done this IRL and gotten people to do an about-face turn about socialism and Shapiro by debunking him point by point. There was a skinhead I knew; had a fight with him for talking shit. Afterwards we debated and I explained to him what was wrong with fascism and why his ideas of socialism were myths, exposing the contradictions and truth. The dude did a complete 180 and became an active socialist opposing nazi-shit.
In short, /pol/-shitters are very obvious most times and are a 'safe' way of preventing echo-chamber on the site. They break the rules too easily 'cause they're used to 4chan and get banned if they push too far, and before that point they provide an essential unifying enemy for the board. Liberals and NAFO are like a disease by comparison, infesting the site from within and much harder to recover from compared to the superficial, metaphorical bruises /pol/ leaves (and we give back).
No.32375
>>32373>>32360PS: Obviously blatant bait should be deleted unless its a satirical joke or a shitpost in sibera.
No.32377
>>32376>Was a different time.Not really IMO
>It's time we break with /pol/LOL
No.32378
>>32377False nostalgia. It's like Christmas as a child versus as an adult.
No.32379
Why have we banned Tor users from making new threads, uploading photos? I just tried to make a new thread and it failed.
No.32381
>>32379Only applies to some boards
No.32391
>>32381>>32381>Only applies to some boardsnta don't people deserve a policy statement or something if this is happening?
also, are threads like this >>>/leftypol/1832728 something we want on /leftypol/? a clone of it with the same picrels appeared a few days ago
No.32393
>>32378No, it really isn't, because it hasn't changed significantly. We dunked on /pol/ and we continue to do so.
No.32394
>>31903>Devs are on the case. As another user of the archives, do we have a possible ETA? No rush just wondering since I checked on an old fit thread in the archive, noticed the issue and upon coming here and CTRL + Fing, found that someone had already mentioned the code being messed up ITT.
Thanks!
No.32397
>>32391o7
another thread just appeared >>>/leftypol/1832877 wtf are they?
No.32399
>>32393And what's the point of dunking on your retarded drunk uncle?
>>32395Did the first, had to search for the conspiracy thread.
No.32400
>>32399>what's the point of dunking on your retarded drunk uncle?More like the retarded drunk neighbor. And its funny to see them try and pick a fight only to end up making a fool of themselves. Besides as I explained in
>>32373 it lets us sharpen our arguments and understanding of socialism.
>Did the first, had to search for the conspiracy thread. Thanks for moving that one, no big rush on the DBZ one, just asking.
No.32401
>>32367You can discuss with nazis if you want to, you just have to be doing it for your own amusement rather than for their salvation.
>>32373However much you try to frame it as avoiding tedium, I'm going to read it as fear. You aren't sufficiently confident that the site can hold its own against liberals - you imagine that they might actually "subvert" something. You imagine that infighting on a website is something to be feared, rather than something to be managed in pursuit of the most interesting discussion possible. You've said that arguing with Nazis helps refine arguments for socialism - great - but the ability to argue for socialism contra social-democracy has fallen off a cliff since all the socdems, keynesians, and other boring-but-nice little weirdos have fucked off - and I'll tell you, it's not because they all saw the light of Marxism-Leninism. This board's
peak came when it was a massive shitshow of people using flags to show their ideology and arguing against one another! The more ideologically conformist it has become, the more tedious it has become. Like with 4chan, I find my thought process often runs:
Novel thread idea > imagine what the replies will be like > don't bother. It'd be one thing if I suspect 20 people were each going to call me an idiot and misunderstand my post in different ways - if I was told to kill myself by MLs, Maoists, Bookchinites, Anarchists, the odd ancap, a social democrat, a technocrat and a fucking Narodnik, that would be
interesting, but that's not the board we have today.
r.e. video: I'm all for leaving a basic nazi thread up to argue with for fun. It's on more sensitive idpol topics, or when a thread that was actively discussing something else starts to be derailed that it's time to step in.
Your potted history of the term politically incorrect obscures more than it reveals: Bill Maher hosted a show by that name from 1993-2002. He didn't originate it, but Moot wasn't subverting some notion of political correctness with the name - "political correctness" was already a right-wing boogyman and had been for decades. I know plenty about imageboard history: I just don't respect it. If I could have a year zero I would.
Now here's my angle: It doesn't matter if glowies come in because they can't subvert the basic dynamics of a site like this any more than they can subvert gravity. Fundamentally, the gravity of the site will always lean towards posturing as a "Tankie". This is what the average user already does - they're not well read, they're not performing serious analysis, they're pushing a vague vibe, same as everywhere else. That they're slightly better read is more or less a coincidence. In an era of ideological diversity this board might've pushed people to read to advance their argument against other flagposters, but nowadays you can just bluff.
There is always a tendency towards contrarianism on an anonymous board like this, and if the mainstream of imageboards is naziism and the mainstream of other sites is liberalism, that leaves a pretty clear corner to carve out for draping yourself in the flag of the Eastern Bloc. Liberalism is particularly vulnerable on an imageboard because a big part of its strength is posturing as a reasonable adult, but nobody wants to be a reasonable adult on an imageboard - telling someone you'll gulag them on Twitter makes
you look silly, you and 20 people saying they'll do it on an imageboard makes
their thread look silly. Other left ideologies simply don't have the aesthetic or historical clout - you cannot post pictures of Anarchist fighter jets, or discuss what Bookchin did for Opera, or listen to any good Post-Keynesian party songs. If you aren't confident of dominating the board with a home-field advantage this big, something is terribly wrong. If this site can't dogpile and tear-apart NAFO types or Democrats the way it does Nazis, it's already terminally ill. I don't seriously believe that it is - but I do believe the cure lies in bringing in some actual dissent, I believe the cure is in trying to actually grow the userbase rather than wait for it all to slowly bleed away. If they're all idiots, fine: It's no fun in the NKVD when you've got nobody to liquidate. It's no fun discussing foreign policy with people who'll only report to you that there's been another crushing victory for multipolarism after the Empire of Japan's crushing victory down at Iwo Jima.
It's no fun, and that's the problem.
(If you'd like to keep going with this, feel free to make a thread.)
No.32402
>>32401>However much you try to frame it as avoiding tedium, I'm going to read it as fear. In other words you don't actually care about what others think, just what fits your view of this.
> you imagine that they might actually "subvert" something I don't, it was visibly obvious.
>You imagine that infighting on a website is something to be feared, rather than something to be managed in pursuit of the most interesting discussion possible Does left unity ring a bell? We argue already as is, there's no point in throwing in a volatile catalyst to destabilize things and make every conversation a bitch-fest in the making, that's literally the opposite of helpful.
> the ability to argue for socialism contra social-democracy has fallen off a cliff since all the socdems, keynesians I'm not talking about petty welfare capitalists, as those people argue through economics, which is still something to debate, I'm specifically talking about liberals that promote idpol bait, because such topics are polarizing and its very easy to make an OP with a snide attack on the site's users, then scream "bigot" when people rightfully attempt to debunk such rhetoric. It happens Every. Single. Time. It doesn't contribute to arguments or theory, because it always devolves into circular arguments and denial and ends up as just people flinging shit and ad hominum and generally lowering the level of board discussion to the levels of 4chan (ironically).
>The more ideologically conformist it has become It's not conformist - people are constantly debating, arguing and discussing. People complain about shit like "muh Dengists" or "Muh ziggers" and ignore that those threads have heated discussions about socio-economic and political positions regarding those topics, and while there are some generally accepted positions, the details are gone over back and forth constantly.
>Bill Maher hosted a show by that name from 1993-2002Yes I know, but /pol/ was created in 2011 as a replacement for /news/ and /n/ a decade after Maher's show and right when the SJW vs Alt-Right shitfest was developing and when the term politically correct began being thrown around a lot, which is why politically INcorrect was the response.
>already a right-wing boogyman Huh? Political correctness is literally a liberal spook, it's performative nonsense no different from any other appeasement tactic.
>It doesn't matter if glowies come in because they can't subvert the basic dynamics of a site like this any more than they can subvert gravityThat is a statement that fucking glows because they can and have done such things. What the fuck do you think COINTEL PRO is for?
>nobody wants to be a reasonable adult on an imageboard Well that and also liberalism is only POSTURING, and have legs of clay
>If you aren't confident of dominating the board with a home-field advantage this big That's not it, we've fended it off multiple times, the point is that it gets tiresome in a way that bashing nazis isn't. The Nazi is either comedically inept and so a source of humor, or actually comes up with new material that forces people to learn. There's a Gay Nazi flag poster who is a nazi, and while they're told to fuck off for some takes, they also provide actual discussion that forces users to either respond properly and THINK or expose themselves as ignoramuses.
With liberals and glowies, it's always the same tired shit, the same fallacious methods of deflecting arguments, ignoring or dismissing proof and then repeating debunked or unproven claims, ad infinitum/ad nauseum. It's boring, it doesn't make me question my understanding of socialism, it just makes me want to reach through the screen and make them take their meds. It's like arguing with an alzheimer's patient with paranoid schizophrenia; They sound coherent initially to those unable to read between the initial lines, and when they're exposed and forced to face reality, they instead retract and start looping the same shit, leaving the only response being to not respond. But the problem is not responding results in such retarded ideas being allowed to be read and take root unchallenged, resulting in consensus cracking.
>Grow the userbaseI agree, but it's not something to rush into.
>It's no fun in the NKVD when you've got nobody to liquidate. It's no fun discussing foreign policy with people who'll only report to you that there's been another crushing victory for multipolarism after the Empire of Japan's crushing victory down at Iwo Jima. It's no fun, and that's the problem. LOL, for someone stating that you don't respect imageboard history, you sure are promoting a fairly oldschool concept of leftypol. I agree.
>If you'd like to keep going with thisNot really cuz I'm tired and I have work, but make a thread anyway, I'm sure others will chime in. Good night.
No.32403
Guess who's testing in production again!?
No.32404
>>32391> nta don't people deserve a policy statement or something if this is happening?> this is happening"this"??????
No.32405
>>31910…that's what every site with uploadable user content has to deal with, anon
No.32412
>>32408
Thoughts on banning this IP, mods?
No.32414
Please merge
>>>/anime/17031 into the ANIMETA thread
>>>/anime/17031, as this interesting but currently dead thread is on Page 24 and is related to the OP.
Thanks
No.32415
>cant upload pics even when replying
uhhhhhh
No.32482
>>32404"This" as in a statement about which boards or threads tor users can't upload files to. It's kind of ironic because I suggested blocking file uploads as a solution to the node being spammed. This is me reaping I guess.
No.32483
>>32482 (samefag)
fwiw I just tried to upload files to different threads and the policy seems coherent
No.32501
If you are loaded it would explain your emotional incontinence and other pathologies actually.
No.32506
>>32373>Arguing with Nazis refines the arguments of socialistsMost people aren’t sympathetic to Nazism, they’re sympathetic to liberalism
Most people already see bolshevik style communism as better than Nazism
Few see any type of communism as better than liberalism
You need to refine your arguments against liberals that can actually present compelling arguments to people that aren’t brain poisoned by racism and inceldom
Liberals promote freedom and liberty, Nazis promote race wars, one is far more compelling to the average person than the other
No.32738
>>32491Following up on this; Mods please undo the Tor image posting block. There's no spammers at the moment and it barely hinders spammers who just VPN hop instead.
Unique IPs: 126